Person–Organization Fit and Incentives: A Causal Test

References

• Ahmed A, Salas O (2011) Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner’s dilemma game decisions. J. Socio-Econom. 40:242–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy N, Wilderom C, Peterson M (2000) Introduction. Ashkanasy N, Wilderom C, Peterson M, eds. Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 1–19.Google Scholar
• Baker G, Jensen M, Murphy K (1988) Compensation and incentives: Practice and theory. J. Finance 43:593–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2005) Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 120:917–62.Google Scholar
• Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77:417–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardi A, Lee J, Hofmann-Towfigh N, Soutar G (2009) The structure of intra-individual value change. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(5):913–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh J (2006) What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36:147–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh J, Chartrand TL (2000) The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. Reis HT, Judd CM, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK),253–285.Google Scholar
• Bargh J, Gollwitzer PM, Lee-Chai A, Barndollar K, Troetschel R (2001) The automated will: Nonconscious priming of activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81:1014–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ, Choi JJ, Strickland AJ (2010) Social identity and preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:1913–1928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner A (2012) Preferences and organization structure: Towards behavioral economics micro-foundations of organizational analysis. J. Socio-Econom. 46:87–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2005) Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95:616–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T, Ghatak M (2013) Profit with purpose? A theory of social enterprises with experimental evidence. Working paper, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Billig M, Tajfel H (1973) Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 3:27–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, van Reenen J (2010) Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? J. Econom. Perspect. 24:203–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boschini A, Muren A, Persson M (2012) Constructing gender in the economics lab. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84:741–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bull B, Schotter A, Weigelt K (1987) Tournaments and piece rates: An experimental study. J. Political Econom. 95:1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buurman M, Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Van den Bossche S (2012) Public sector employees: Risk-averse and altruistic? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83:279–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabrales A, Miniaci R, Piovesan M, Ponti G (2010) Social preferences and strategic uncertainty: An experiment on markets and contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:2261–2278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C (2003) Behavioral Game Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Weber R (2008) Growing organizational culture in the laboratory. Plott C, Smith V, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1 (North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam), 903–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron KS, Quinn RE (2011) Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Charness G, Rigotti L, Rustichini A (2007) Individual behavior and group membership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97:1340–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman J, Barsade S (1995) Personality, organizational culture and cooperation: Evidence from a business simulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40:423–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99:431–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X-P, Wasti SA, Triandis H (2007) When does group norm or group identity predict cooperation in a public goods dilemma? The moderating effects of idiocentrism and allocentrism. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations 31:259–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi J-K, Bowles S (2007) The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318:636–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psych. Bull. 112:155–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Kagel J (2005) Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95:477–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Custers R, Aarts H (2010) The unconscious will: How pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science 329:47–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu C, Nauta A (2009) Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: Implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. J. Appl. Psych. 94:913–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeVellis R (1991) Scale Development: Theory and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Drouvelis M, Metcalfe R, Powdthavee N (2010) Priming cooperation in social dilemma games. IZA Discussion Paper 4963, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman P (2005) Managing diversity by creating team identity. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58:371–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Wilson R (2004) Is trust a risky decision? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 55:447–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards J (2008) Person–environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. Acad. Management Ann. 2:167–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erez M, Earley P (1993) Culture, Self-Identity and Work (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gintis H (2007) Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 33:43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10:171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:541–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Homberg F, Osterloh M (2013) Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organ. Stud. 34:949–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B (2009) Does national culture constrain organization culture and human resource strategy? The role of individual level mechanisms and implications for employee selection. Martocchio JJ, Liao H, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 28 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B, Rynes S, Fulmer I (2009) Pay and performance: Individuals, groups, and executives. Acad. Management Ann. 3:251–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant AM, Berg JM (2012) Prosocial motivation at work: When, why, and how making a difference makes a difference. Cameron KS, Spreitzer GM, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford University Press, New York), 28–44.Google Scholar
• Greiner B (2004) The online recruitment system ORSEE 2.0—A guide for the organization of experiments in economics. Working Paper Series in Economics 10, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Hamilton B, Nickerson J, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111:465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbring C, Irlenbusch B (2011) Sabotage in tournaments: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Management Sci. 57:611–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Healy A, Patt J (2011) Can teams help to close the gender competition gap? Econom. J. 121:1192–1204.Google Scholar
• Hoffman B, Woehr D (2006) A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. J. Vocational Behav. 68:389–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (1985) The interaction between national and organizational value systems. J. Management Stud. 22:347–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt C, Laury S (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92:1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• House R, Hanges P, Javidan M, Dorfman P, Gupta V, eds. (2004) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Johnson R, Chang C-H, Yang L-Q (2010) Commitment and motivation at work: The relevance of employee identity and regulatory focus. Acad. Management Rev. 35:226–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E (2012) Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annual Rev. Econom. 4:427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karremans J, Stroebe W, Claus J (2006) Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42:792–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, von Siemens F (2011) Competition, cooperation, and corporate culture. RAND J. Econom. 42:23–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E (1999) Personnel economics: Past lessons and future directions. J. Labor Econom. 17:199–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL (2007) Personnel economics: The economist’s view of human resources. J. Econom. Perspect. 21(4):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledford GE Jr, Lawler EE III, Mohrman SA (1995) Reward innovations in Fortune 1000 companies. Compensation Benefits Rev. 27:91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt S, List J (2011) Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 3:224–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maio G, Pakzeh A, Cheung W-Y, Rees K (2009) Changing, priming, and acting on values: Effects via motivational relations in a circular model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97:699–715.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104:277–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JM, Maynard T, Rapp T, Gilson L (2008) Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J. Management 34:410–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matsumura E, Shin J (2006) An empirical analysis of an incentive plan with relative performance measures: Evidence from a postal service. Accounting Rev. 81:533–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nalbantian H, Schotter A (1997) Productivity under group incentives: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87:314–41.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Chatman J, Caldwell D (1991) People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Acad. Management J. 34:487–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orrison A, Schotter A, Weigelt K (2004) Multiperson contests: An experimental examination. Management Sci. 50:268–279.Link, Google Scholar
• Osterloh M, Frey B (2013) Motivation governance. Grandori A, ed. Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organization Theory (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 26–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyserman D (2011) Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 22:164–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyserman D, Lee S (2008) Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psych. Bull. 134:311–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37:7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rand D, Dreber A, Ellingsen T, Fudenberg D, Nowak M (2009) Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science 325:1272–1275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roccas S, Sagiv L, Schwartz S, Knafo A (2002) The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 28:789–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sagiv L, Schwartz S, Arieli S (2011) Personal values, national culture and organizations: Insights applying the Schwartz value framework. Ashkanasy NM, Wilderom CPM, Peterson MF, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate, 2nd ed. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 515–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider B (1987) The people make the place. Personnel Psych. 40:437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Zanna MP, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25 (Academic Press, San Diego), 1–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S (2005) Basic human values: Their content and structure across cultures. Tamayo A, Porto J, eds. Valores e Trabalho [Values and Work] (Editoa Vozes, Brasília, Brazil), 21–55.Google Scholar
• Schwartz S (2010) Basic values: How they motivate and inhibit prosocial behavior. Mikulincer M, Shaver P, eds. Herzliya Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 1 (American Psychological Association Press, Washington, DC), 221–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S (2012) An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings Psych. Culture 2(1):Article 11.Google Scholar
• Schwartz S, Lehmann A, Roccas S (1999) Multimethod probes of basic human values. Adamopoulos J, Kashima Y, eds. Social Psychology and Culture Context: Essays in Honor of Harry C. Triandis (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 107–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S, Sagiv L, Boehnke K (2000) Worries and values. J. Personality 68:309–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S, Melech G, Lehmann A, Burgess S, Harris M, Owens V (2001) Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 32:268–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shantz A, Latham G (2009) An exploratory field experiment on the effect of subconscious and conscious goals on employee performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Making Processes 109:9–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shreremeta R (2011) Contest design: An experimental investigation. Econom. Inquiry 49:573–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M (2009) Individual behavior and group membership: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99:2247–2257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Strassmair R (2009) Communication, cooperation and collusion in team tournaments—An experimental study. Games Econom. Behav. 66:506–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks-Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
• Van den Steen E (2010) On the origin of shared beliefs (and corporate culture). RAND J. Econom. 41:617–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verquer M, Beehr T, Wagner S (2003) A meta-analysis of the relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. J. Vocational Behav. 63:473–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogel R, Feldman D (2009) Integrating the levels of person-environment fit. The roles of vocational fit and group fit. J. Vocational Behav. 75:68–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber R, Camerer C (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. 49:400–415.Link, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones B, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316:1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar