Formal Enforcement Actions and Bank Behavior

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2343

References

  • Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94(2):291–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2007) Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? J. Internat. Econom. 71(1):72–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006) International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards (Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2012) Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision (Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • Berger AN, Roman RA (2015) Did TARP banks get competitive advantages? J. Financial Quant. Anal. 50(6):1199–1236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger AN, Davies S, Flannery M (2000) Comparing market and supervisory assessments of bank performance: Who knows what when? J. Money, Credit Banking 32(3, Part 2):641–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger AN, Herring RJ, Szegö GP (1995) The role of capital in financial institutions. J. Banking Finance 19(3–4):393–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger AN, Kyle MK, Scalise JM (2001) Did U.S. bank supervisors get tougher during the credit crunch? Did they get easier during the banking boom? Did it matter to bank lending? Mishkin F, ed. Prudential Supervision: What Works and What Doesn’t (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 301–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger AN, Bouwman C, Kick T, Schaeck K (2016) Bank risk taking and liquidity creation following regulatory interventions and capital support. J. Financial Intermediation. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brous P, Leggett K (1996) Wealth effects of enforcement actions against financially distressed banks. J. Financial Res. 19(4):561–577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brunmeier J, Willardson N (2006) Supervisory enforcement actions since FIRREA and FDICIA: “Arbitrary, draconian and inflexible” or a model of regulatory restraint? The Region (Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Banking and Policy Issues Magazine), (September 1).Google Scholar
  • Caprio G, Demirgüç-Kunt A, Kane E (2010) The 2007 meltdown in structured securitization: Searching for lessons, not scapegoats. World Bank Res. Observer 25(1):125–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole R, Cornyn G, Gunther J (1995) FIMS: A new monitoring system for banking institutions. Federal Reserve Bull. 81:1–15.Google Scholar
  • Curry T (1997) Bank examination and enforcement. History of the Eighties—Lessons for the Future: An Examination of the Banking Crises of the 1980s and Early 1990s, Vol. I (Division of Research and Statistics, FDIC, Arlington, VA), 421–475.Google Scholar
  • Curry T, O’Keefe J, Coburn J, Montgomery L (1999) Financial distressed banks: How effective are enforcement actions in the supervision process? FDIC Banking Rev. 12(2):1–18.Google Scholar
  • Delis M, Staikouras P (2011) Supervisory effectiveness and bank risk. Rev. Finance 15(3):511–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demirgüc-Kunt A (1989) Deposit-institution failures: A review of empirical literature. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Econom. Rev. 25(4):2–18.Google Scholar
  • Demirgüç-Kunt A, Detragiache E, Tressel T (2008) Banking on the principles: Compliance with Basel Core Principles and bank soundness. J. Financial Intermediation 17(4):511–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Young R, Flannery M, Lang W, Sorescu S (2001) The information content of bank exam ratings and subordinated debt prices. J. Money, Credit Banking 33(4):900–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eynon G, Hill NT, Stevens KT (1997) Factors that influence the moral reasoning abilities of accountants: Implications for universities and the profession. J. Bus. Ethics 16(12):1297–1309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (2005) From the examiner’s desk…The FDIC’s relationship manager program: A win/win situation. Supervisory Insights 2(2):22–26.Google Scholar
  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (2012) (updated October 2012). Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies.Google Scholar
  • Galloway T, Lee W, Roden D (1997) Banks’ changing incentives and opportunities for risk taking. J. Banking Finance 21(4):509–527.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • General Accounting Office (GAO) (1989) Testimony—Failed thrifts: Internal control weaknesses create an environment conducive to fraud, insider abuse, and related unsafe practices. Report T-AFMD-89-4, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • General Accounting Office (GAO) (1991) Bank supervision: Prompt and forceful regulatory actions needed. Report GAO/GGD-91-69, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Grier W (2007) Credit Analysis of Financial Institutions (Euromoney Institutional Investor, London).Google Scholar
  • Hardies K, Breesch D, Branson J (2010) Are female auditors still women? Analyzing the sex differences affecting audit quality. Working paper, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
  • Ittonen K, Vähämaa E (2012) Auditor’s gender and audit fees. Internat. J. Auditing 16(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ittonen K, Vähämaa E, Vähämaa S (2013) Female auditors and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons 27(2):205–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan J, Peek J, Rosengren E (2000) The market reaction to the disclosure for supervisory information: Implications for bank transparency. J. Financial Intermediation 9(3):298–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lechner M (2011) The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 4(3):165–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milne A (2002) Bank capital regulation as an incentive mechanism: Implications for portfolio choice. J. Banking Finance 26(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) (2007) Bank Supervision Process: Comptroller’s Handbook (OCC, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) (2011) Policies and Procedures Manual: Bank Supervision Operations (OCC, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Peek J, Rosengren E (1995) Bank regulation and the credit crunch. J. Banking Finance 19(3-4):679–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slovin M, Sushka M, Polonchek J (1999) An analysis of contagion and competitive effects at commercial banks. J. Financial Econom. 54(2):197–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.