Do CMO Incentives Matter? An Empirical Investigation of CMO Compensation and Its Impact on Firm Performance

References

• Aggarwal RK, Samwick AA (1999) The other side of the trade-off: The impact of risk on executive compensation. J. Political Econom. 107(1):65–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Oliver RL (1987) Perspectives on behavior-based versus outcome-based salesforce control systems. J. Marketing 51(4):76–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond SR (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-component models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avery J, Steenburgh TJ, Deighton J, Caravella M (2012) Adding bricks to clicks: Predicting the patterns of cross-channel elasticities over time. J. Marketing 76(3):96–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Basu AK, Lal R, Srinivasan V, Staelin R (1985) Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. 4(4):267–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Beck T, Levine R, Loayza N (2000) Finance and the sources of growth. J. Financial Econom. 58(1–2):261–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81(3):637–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond SR (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bound J, Cummins C, Griliches Z, Hall BH, Jaffe A (1984) Who does R&D and who patents. Griliches Z, ed. R&D, Patents and Productivity (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA), 21–54.Google Scholar
• Boyd DE, Chandy RK, Cunha M Jr (2010) When do chief marketing officers affect firm value? A customer power explanation. J. Marketing Res. 47(6):1162–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockman P, Martin X, Unlu E (2010) Executive compensation and the maturity structure of corporate debt. J. Finance 65(3):1123–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown C, Hamilton J, Medoff J (1990) Employers Large and Small (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chauvin KW, Hirschey M (1993) Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financial Management 22(4):128–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2006) Managerial incentives and risk-taking. J. Financial Econom. 79(2):431–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Core J, Guay W (2002) Estimating the value of employee stock option portfolios and their sensitivities to price and volatility. J. Accounting Res. 40(3):613–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Core JE, Guay WR, Larcker DF (2003) Executive equity compensation and incentives: A survey. Econom. Policy Rev. 9(1):27–50.Google Scholar
• Coughlan AT, Narasimhan C (1992) An empirical analysis of sales force compensation plans. J. Bus. 65(1):93–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Currim IS, Lim J, Kim JW (2012) You get what you pay for: The effect of top executives’ compensation on advertising and R&D spending decisions and stock market return. J. Marketing 76(5):33–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K (1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. 31(2):134–149.Link, Google Scholar
• Fabrizi M (2014) Chief marketing officer’s equity incentives: Economic determinants and effects on shareholder value. Eur. J. Marketing 48(9–10):1757–1781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (1974) Accounting for research and development costs. Statement, Financial Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT.Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (1993) Reporting on advertising costs. Statement, Financial Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT.Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1996) Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (West Publishing, St. Paul, MN).Google Scholar
• Gabaix X, Landier A (2008) Why has CEO pay increased so much? Quart. J. Econom. 123(1):49–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Germann F, Ebbes P, Grewal R (2015) The chief marketing officer matters. J. Marketing 79(3):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser JR, Simester DI, Wernerfelt B (1994) Customer satisfaction incentives. Marketing Sci. 13(4):327–350.Link, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschey M, Skiba H, Wintoki MB (2012) The size, concentration and evolution of corporate R&D spending in U.S. firms from 1976 to 2010: Evidence and implications. J. Corporate Finance 18(3):496–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoechle D, Schmid M, Walter I, Yermack D (2012) How much of the diversification discount can be explained by poor corporate governance? J. Financial Econom. 103(1):41–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huo K, Robinson DT (2006) Industry concentration and average stock returns. J. Finance 61(4):1927–1956.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (2008) A Guide to Econometrics, 6th ed. (Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lal R, Srinivasan V (1993) Compensation plans for single and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmstrom–Milgrom model. Management Sci. 39(7):777–793.Link, Google Scholar
• Merton R (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 4(1):141–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy KJ (1999) Executive compensation. Handbook Labor Econom. 3(B):2485–2563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nath P, Mahajan V (2008) Chief marketing officers: A study of their presence in firms’ top management teams. J. Marketing 72(1):65–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickell SJ (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(1):435–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross S (1973) The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(2):134–139.Google Scholar
• Rossi PE (2014) Even the rich can make themselves poor: A critical examination of IV methods in marketing applications. Marketing Sci. 33(5):655–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews D, Stock J, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tavassoli NT, Sorescu A, Chandy R (2014) Employee-based brand equity: Why firms with strong brands pay their executives less. J. Marketing Res. 51(6):676–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varadarajan PR, Clark T (1994) Delineating the scope of corporate and marketing strategy. J. Bus. Res. 31(2–3):93–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wintoki MB, Linck JS, Netter JM (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. J. Financial Econom. 105(3):581–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (1995) Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions. J. Econometrics 68(1):115–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yermack D (2006) Flights of fancy: Corporate jets, CEO perquisites, and inferior shareholder returns. J. Financial Econom. 80(1):211–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (1994) The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management J. 15(S1):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar