Learning to Manage and Managing to Learn: The Effects of Student Leadership Service

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2483

References

  • Al-Ubaydli O, List JA (2012) On the generalizability of experimental results in economics. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson ML (2008) Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and early training projects. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(484):1481–1495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C, Galinsky AD (2006) Power, optimism, and risk-taking. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(4):511–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J (2006) Leadership giving in charitable fund-raising. J. Public Econom. Theory 8(1):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babcock L, Loewenstein G (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. J. Econom. Perspect. 11(1):109–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2012) Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science 335(6068):582–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaman L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2009) Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1497–1540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamini Y, Krieger AM, Yekutieli D (2006) Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 93(3):491–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1169–1208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Billett MT, Qian Y (2008) Are overconfident CEOs born or made? Evidence of self-attribution bias from frequent acquirers. Management Sci. 54(6):1037–1051.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C, Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):306–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E (2004) Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72(5):1409–1443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl GB, Ransom MR (1999) Does where you stand depend on where you sit? Tithing donations and self-serving beliefs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(4):703–727.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duval TS, Silvia PJ (2002) Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(1):49–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC (2003) From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3):453–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galinsky AD, Magee JC, Ena Inesi M, Gruenfeld DH (2006) Power and perspectives not taken. Psych. Sci. 17(12):1068–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Güth W, Levati MV, Sutter M, van der Heijden E (2007) Leading by example with and without exclusion power in voluntary contribution experiments. J. Public Econom. 91(5–6):1023–1042.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hermalin BE (1998) Toward an economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(5):1188–1206.Google Scholar
  • Jones BF, Olken BA (2005) Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):835–864.Google Scholar
  • Kuhn P, Weinberger C (2005) Leadership skills and wages. J. Labor Econom. 23(3):395–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee DS (2008) Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. J. Econometrics 142(2):675–697.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt SD, List JA (2007) Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field. Canadian J. Econom. 40(2):347–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2015) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Malmendier U, Tate G (2005) CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. J. Finance 60(6):2661–2700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maniadis Z, Tufano F, List JA (2014) One swallow doesn’t make a summer: New evidence on anchoring effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):277–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR (2007) Interference between units in randomized experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102(477):191–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Steen E (2004) Rational overoptimism (and other biases). Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):1141–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.