Task Decomposition and Newsvendor Decision Making

References

• Abbas AE, Budescu DV, Yu H-T, Haggerty R (2008) A comparison of two probability encoding methods: Fixed probability vs. fixed variable values. Decision Anal. 5(4):190–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Fitzsimons GJ, Simester D (2006) Measuring and mitigating the costs of stockouts. Management Sci. 52(11):1751–1763.Link, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Dawes RM, Christensen C (1986) Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(1):93–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Gonzalez-Vallejo C, Bonham AJ, Kung Y-H, Bailey N (2010) Assessing the merits and faults of holistic and disaggregated judgments. J. Behavioral Decision Making 23(3):250–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Denniston WB, Gordon MM (1975) The use of the decomposition principle in making judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 14(2):257–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann UW (2013) Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Sci. 59(8):1800–1816.Link, Google Scholar
• Belli RF, Schwarz N, Singer E, Talarico J (2000) Decomposition can harm the accuracy of behavioral frequency reports. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 14(4):295–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolger F, Harvey N (1993) Context-sensitive heuristics in statistical reasoning. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. 46A(4):779–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Jackman RW (1990) Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. Fox J, Long JS, eds. Modern Methods of Data Analysis (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 257–291.Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Thonemann UW (2012) Managers and students as newsvendors. Management Sci. 58(12):2225–2233.Link, Google Scholar
• Bostian AA, Holt CA, Smith AM (2008) Newsvendor “pull-to-center” effect: Adaptive learning in a laboratory experiment. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):590–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Brehmer B (1978) Response consistency in probabilistic inference tasks. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 22(1):103–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Du N (2007) Coherence and consistency of investors’ probability judgments. Management Sci. 53(11):1731–1744.Link, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Erev I, Wallsten TS (1997) On the importance of random error in the study of probability judgment. Part I: New theoretical developments. J. Behavioral Decision Making 10(3):157–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Kök AG, Tong JJD (2013) The effect of payment schemes on inventory decisions: The role of mental accounting. Management Sci. 59(2):436–451.Link, Google Scholar
• Connolly T, Dean D (1997) Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks. Management Sci. 43(7):1029–1045.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai T, Jerath K (2013) Salesforce compensation with inventory considerations. Management Sci. 59(11):2490–2501.Link, Google Scholar
• de Véricourt F, Jain K, Bearden JN, Filipowicz A (2013) Sex, risk and the newsvendor. J. Oper. Management 31(1–2):86–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dietvorst BJ, Simmons JP, Massey C (2015) Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 144(1):114–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H (1972) Expert measurement and mechanical combination. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 7(1):86–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W, Jank W, Zhang S, Karaesmen IZ (2015) Sales force behavior, pricing information, and pricing decisions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(4):495–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Fildes R, Goodwin P, Lawrence M, Nikolopoulos K (2009) Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning. Internat. J. Forecasting 25(1):3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaur V, Kesavan S, Raman A, Fisher ML (2007) Estimating demand uncertainty using judgmental forecasts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(4):480–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Gönül MS, Önkal D, Lawrence M (2006) The effects of structural characteristics of explanations on use of a DSS. Decision Support Systems 42(3):1481–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin P (2005) Providing support for decisions based on time series information under conditions of asymmetric loss. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163(2):388–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammond KR, Summers DA (1972) Cognitive control. Psych. Rev. 79(1):58–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haran U, Moore DA, Morewedge CK (2010) A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Judgment Decision Making 5(7): 467–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N (1995) Why are judgments less consistent in less predictable task situations? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 63(3):247–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrion M, Fischer GW, Mullin T (1993) Divide and conquer? Effects of decomposition on the accuracy and calibration of subjective probability distributions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 55(2):207–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Frederick S (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribution substitution in intuitive judgment. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extension and Application (Cambridge University Press, New York), 49–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koriat A, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Combs B (1980) Reasons for confidence. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Learn. Memory 6(2): 107–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Minner S, Van Wassenhove LN (2010) Do random errors explain newsvendor behavior? Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 12(4):673–681.Link, Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Moritz B, Siemsen E (2011) Demand forecasting behavior: System neglect and change detection. Management Sci. 57(10):1827–1843.Link, Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Siemsen E, Thomas DJ (2016) The sum and its parts: Judgmental hierarchical forecasting. Management Sci. 62(9):2745–2764.Link, Google Scholar
• Langer EJ (1975) The illusion of control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 32(2):311–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapide L (2014) Planning and forecasting work hand in hand. J. Bus. Forecasting 33(1):12–14.Google Scholar
• Larrick RP, Soll JB (2006) Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Sci. 52(1):111–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Lau N, Bearden JN (2012) Newsvendor demand chasing revisited. Management Sci. 59(5):1245–1249.Link, Google Scholar
• Lawrence M, O’Connor M (2005) Judgmental forecasting in the presence of loss functions. Internat. J. Forecasting 21(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li B, Oliva R, Watson N (2015) Do retail managers rock or paddle the boat? Empirical findings from restocking decisions. Working paper, Texas A&M University, College Station.Google Scholar
• Lurie NH, Swaminathan JM (2009) Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyness KS, Cornelius ET (1982) A comparison of holistic and decomposed judgment strategies in a performance rating simulation. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 29(1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacGregor DG, Armstrong JS (1994) Judgmental decomposition: When does it work? Internat. J. Forecasting 10(4):495–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacGregor D, Lichtenstein S (1991) Problem structuring aids for quantitative estimation. J. Behav. Decision Making 4(2):101–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacGregor D, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (1988) Structuring knowledge retrieval: An analysis of decomposed quantitative judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 42(3):303–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCarthy TM, Davis DF, Golicic SL, Mentzer JT (2006) The evolution of sales forecasting management: A 20-year longitudinal study of forecasting practices. J. Forecasting 25(5):303–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morera OF, Budescu DV (1998) A psychometric analysis of the “divide and conquer” principle in multicriteria decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 75(3):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moritz BB, Hill AV, Donohue KL (2013) Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: Behavior and cognitive reflection. J. Oper. Management 31(1-2):72–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ockenfels A, Selten R (2014) Impulse balance in the newsvendor game. Games Econom. Behav. 86(July):237–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Watson N (2011) Cross-functional alignment in supply chain planning: A case study of sales and operations planning. J. Oper. Management 29(5):434–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the U.S. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.Link, Google Scholar
• Petruzzi N, Dada M (2010) Newsvendor models. Cochran JJ, Cox LA, Keskinocak P, Kharoufeh JP, Smith JC, eds. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 3528–3537.Google Scholar
• Raiffa H (1968) Decision Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Ravinder HV (1992) Random error in holistic evaluations and additive decompositions of multiattribute utility—An empirical comparison. J. Behav. Decision Making 5(3):155–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravinder HV, Kleinmuntz DN (1990) Random error in additive decompositions of multiattribute utility. J. Behav. Decision Making 4(2):83–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Croson R (2013) Overconfidence in newsvendor orders: An experimental study. Management Sci. 59(11):2502–2517.Link, Google Scholar
• Rudi N, Drake D (2014) Observation bias: The impact of demand censoring on newsvendor level and adjustment behavior. Management Sci. 60(5):1334–1345.Link, Google Scholar
• Rushton A, Croucher P, Baker P (2014) The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management, 5th ed. (Kogan Page, London).Google Scholar
• Sachs A-L (2015) Empirical newsvendor decisions under a service level contract. Retail Analytics: Integrated Forecasting and Inventory Management for Perishable Products in Retailing, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 680 (Springer International, Cham, Switzerland), 79–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheele LM, Slikker M, Thonemann UW (2014) Designing incentive systems for truthful demand information sharing—Theory and experiment. Working paper, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Cachon G (2000) Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 46(3):404–420.Link, Google Scholar
• Su X (2008) Bounded rationality in newsvendor models. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):566–589.Link, Google Scholar
• Trapero JR, Kourentzes N, Fildes R (2015) On the identification of sales forecasting models in the presence of promotions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66(2):299–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Donselaar KH, Gaur V, van Woensel T, Broekmeulen RACM, Fransoo JC (2010) Ordering behavior in retail stores and implications for automated replenishment. Management Sci. 56(5): 766–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I (2004) Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 93(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye LR, Johnson PE (1995) The impact of explanation facilities on user acceptance of expert systems advice. MIS Quart. 19(2): 157–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zarnowitz V, Lambros LA (1987) Consensus and uncertainty in economic prediction. J. Political Econom. 95(3):591–621.Crossref, Google Scholar