The Dynamic Spillovers of Entry: An Application to the Generic Drug Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2648

References

  • Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2007) Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica 75(1):1–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2010) Dynamic discrete choice structural models: A survey. J. Econometrics 156(1):38–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amisano G, Giorgetti ML (2013) Entry into pharmaceutical submarkets: A Bayesian panel probit analysis. J. Appl. Econometrics 28(4):667–701.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B, Conneely C (2003a) Fox and the NFL-1998. HBS Case 9-704-444, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Anand B, Conneely C (2003b) Fox bids for the NFL-1993. HBS Case 9-704-443, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Anand BN, Khanna T (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. 21(3):295–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arcidiacono P, Miller R (2011) Conditional choice probability estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 79(6):1823–1868.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P, Benkard CL, Levin J (2007) Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometrica 75(5):1331–1370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P, Chernozhukov V, Hong H, Nekipelov D (2015) Identification and efficient semiparametric estimation of a dynamic discrete game. NBER Working Paper 21125, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P, Hong H, Ryan SP (2010a) Identification and estimation of a discrete game of complete information. Econometrica 78(5):1529–1568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P, Hong H, Krainer J, Nekipelov D (2010b) Estimating static models of strategic interactions. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 28(4):469–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass F (1980) The relationship between diffusion rates, experience curves, and demand elasticities for consumer durable technological innovations. J. Bus. 53(3, Part 2):S51–S67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass FM, Bruce N, Majumdar S, Murthi BPS (2007) Wearout effects of different advertising themes: A dynamic Bayesian model of the advertising sales relationship. Marketing Sci. 26(2):179–195.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benkard CL (2004) A dynamic analysis of the market for wide-bodied commercial aircraft. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(3):581–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benkard CL, Jeziorski P, Weintraub GY (2015) Oblivious equilibrium for concentrated industries. RAND J. Econom. 46(4):671–701.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry ST (1992) Estimation of a model of entry in the airline industry. Econometrica 60(4):889–917.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry ST, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T, Reiss P (1991a) Empirical models of discrete games. J. Econometrics 48(1–2):57–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T, Reiss P (1991b) Entry and competition in concentrated markets. J. Political Econom. 99(5):977–1009.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruce NI (2008) Pooling and dynamic forgetting effects in multi-theme advertising: Tracking the advertising sales relationship with particle filters. Marketing Sci. 27(4):659–673.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Che H, Sudhir K, Seetharaman P (2007) Bounded rationality in pricing under state dependent demand: Do firms look ahead? How far ahead? J. Marketing Res. 44(3):434–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernozhukov V, Hong H (2003) A MCMC approach to classical estimation. J. Econometrics 115(2):293–346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching AT (2010a) A dynamic oligopoly structural model for the prescription drug market after patent expiration. Internat. Econom. Rev. 51(4):1175–1207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching AT (2010b) Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(6):619–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ching AT, Erdem T, Keane MP (2013) Learning models: An assessment of progress, challenges and new developments. Marketing Sci. 32(6):913–938.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ciliberto F, Tamer E (2009) Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets. Econometrica 77(6):1791–1828.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conti R, Berndt E (2013) Anatomy of U.S. cancer drug shortages: Technology, market structure and price competition. Working paper, MIT Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  • Datta S, Sudhir K (2011) The agglomeration-differentiation tradeoff in spatial location choice. Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • Dolan RJ, Jeuland AP (1981) Experience curves and dynamic demand models: Implications for optimal pricing strategies. J. Marketing 45(1):52–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doucet A, de Freitas N, Gordon N (2001) An introduction to sequential Monte Carlo methods. Doucet A, de Freitas N, Gordon N, eds. Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice (Springer, New York), 3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebbinghaus H (1913) Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. Translated by Ruger HA, Bussenius CE (Teachers College, Columbia University, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellickson PB, Misra S (2008) Supermarket pricing strategies. Marketing Sci. 27(5):811–828.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ericson R, Pakes A (1995) Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(1):53–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fernández-Villaverde J, Rubio-Ramírez JF (2005) Estimating dynamic equilibrium economies: Linear versus nonlinear likelihood. J. Appl. Econometrics 20(7):891–910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flury T, Shephard N (2010) Bayesian inference based only on simulated likelihood: Particle filter analysis of dynamic economic models. Econometric Theory 27(5):933–956.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallant AR (1968) A note on the measurement of cost/quantity relationships in the aircraft industry. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 63(324):1247–1252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallant AR, Hong H, Khwaja A (2017) A Bayesian approach to estimation of dynamic models with small and large number of heterogeneous players and latent serially correlated states. J. Econometrics 203(1):19–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gebhardt WR, Lee CMC, Swaminathan B (2001) Toward and implied cost of capital. J. Accounting Res. 39(1):135–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A, Roberts GO, Gilks W (1996) Efficient Metropolis jumping rules. Berger JO, Bernardo JM, Dawid AP, Smith AFM, eds. Bayesian Statistics 5 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK),599–607.Google Scholar
  • Geweke J (2005) Contemporary Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geweke J, Keane M (2001) Computationally intensive methods for integration in econometrics. Heckman JJ, Leamer E, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam),3465–3564.Google Scholar
  • Grabowski H, Vernon J, DiMasi JA (2002) Returns on research and development for 1990s new drug introductions. Pharmacoeconomics 20(Supplement 3):11–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hajivassiliou V, McFadden D, Ruud P (1996) Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities and their derivatives, theoretical and computational results. J. Econometrics 72(1–2):85–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J (1981) Heterogeneity and state dependence. Rosen S, ed. Studies in Labor Markets (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 91–139.Google Scholar
  • Heckman J, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52(2):271–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitsch G (2006) An empirical model of optimal dynamic product launch and exit under demand uncertainty. Marketing Sci. 25(1):25–50.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hotz J, Miller R (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):497–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu Y, Shum M (2012) Nonparametric identification of dynamic models with unobserved state variables. J. Econometrics 171(1):32–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurwicz L (1950) Generalization of the concept of identification. Koopmans T, ed. Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 245–257.Google Scholar
  • Imai S, Jain N, Ching A (2009) Bayesian estimation of dynamic discrete choice models. Econometrica 77(6):1865–1899.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap SD, Naik PA (2008) BidAnalyzer: A method for estimation and selection of dynamic bidding models. Marketing Sci. 27(6):949–960.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jia P (2008) What happens when Wal-Mart comes to town: An empirical analysis of the discount retailing industry. Econometrica 76(6):1263–1316.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kasahara H, Shimotsu K (2008) Nonparametric identification of finite mixture models of dynamic discrete choices. Econometrica 77(1):135–176.Google Scholar
  • Keane MP (1994) A computationally practical simulation estimator for panel data. Econometrica 62(1):95–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keane MP, Wolpin KI (1997) The career decisions of young men. J. Political Econom. 105(3):473–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khwaja A (2010) Estimating willingness to pay for Medicare using a dynamic life-cycle model of demand for health insurance. J. Econometrics 156(1):130–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster T (2004) An Introduction to Modern Bayesian Econometrics (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Magnac T, Thesmar D (2002) Identifying dynamic discrete decision processes. Econometrica 70(2):801–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Chintagunta P (2004) Responsiveness of physician prescription behavior to salesforce effort: An individual level analysis. Marketing Lett. 15(2):129–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Rossi P, Chintagunta PK (2004) Response modeling with nonrandom marketing-mix variables. J. Marketing Res. 41(4):467–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazzeo M (2002) Product choice and oligopoly market structure. RAND J. Econom. 33(2):1–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naik PA, Raman K, Winer RS (2005) Planning marketing-mix strategies in the presence of interactions. Marketing Sci. 24(1):25–34.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Narayanan S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta P (2005) Temporal differences in the role of marketing communication in new product categories. J. Marketing Res. 42(3):278–290.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Norets A (2009) Inference in dynamic discrete choice models with serially correlated unobserved state variables. Econometrica 77(5):1665–1682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orhun Y (2013) Spatial differentiation in the supermarket industry: The role of common information. Quant. Marketing Econom. 11(1):3–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pakes A, Ostrovsky M, Berry S (2007) Simple estimators for the parameters of discrete dynamic games (with entry/exit examples). RAND J. Econom. 38(2):373–399.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pesendorfer M, Schmidt-Dengler P (2010) Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games: A comment. Econometrica 78(2):833–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poirier D (1998) Revising beliefs in nonidentified models. Econometric Theory 14(4):483–509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reiffen D, Ward M (2005) Generic drug industry dynamics. Rev. Econom. Statist. 87(1):37–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts GO, Rosenthal JS (2001) Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. Statist. Sci. 16(4):351–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rust J (1994) Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Engle R, McFadden D, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 3081–3143.Google Scholar
  • Rysman M (2004) Competition between networks: A study of the market for Yellow Pages. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):483–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott-Morton F (1999) Entry decisions into generic pharmaceutical markets. RAND J. Econom. 30(3):421–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seim K (2006) An empirical model of firm entry with endogenous product-type choices. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):619–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen Q (2014) A dynamic model of entry and exit in a growing industry. Marketing Sci. 33(5):712–724.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shen Q, Villas-Boas JM (2010) Strategic entry before demand takes off. Management Sci. 56(8):1259–1271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sriram S, Chintagunta PK, Neelamegham R (2006) Effects of brand preference, product attributes, and marketing mix variables in technology product markets. Marketing Sci. 25(5):440–456.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tamer E (2003) Incomplete simultaneous discrete response model with multiple equilibria. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(1):147–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vitorino MA (2012) Empirical entry games with complementarities: An application to the shopping center industry. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):175–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weintraub G, Benkard C, Van Roy B (2008) Markov perfect industry dynamics with many firms. Econometrica 76:1375–1411.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright T (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J. Aeronautical Sci. 3(4):122–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zellner A (1971) An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Zhu T, Singh V (2009) Spatial competition with endogenous location choices: An application to discount retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(1):1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.