Cross-Sided Liquidity Externalities

References

• Admati AR, Pfleiderer P (1988) A theory of intraday patterns: Volume and price variability. Rev. Financial Stud. 1(1):3–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Desai PS, Shin W (2015) Keyword search advertising and first-page bid estimates: A strategic analysis. Management Sci. 61(3):507–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Amihud Y, Mendelson H, Lauterbach B (1997) Market microstructure and securities values: Evidence from the Tel Aviv stock exchange. J. Financial Econom. 45(3):365–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand A, McCormick T, Serban L (2013a) Incentives for liquidity provision: Is the make-take structure the answer? Working paper, Whitman School of Management, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
• Anand A, Irvine P, Puckett A, Venkataraman K (2013b) Institutional trading and stock resiliency: Evidence from the 2007–2009 financial crisis. J. Financial Econom. 108(3):773–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angel J, Harris L, Spatt C (2011) Equity trading in the 21st century. Quart. J. Finance 5(1):1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD (2005) Instrumental variables methods in experimental criminological research: What, why and how. J. Experiment. Criminol. 2(1):1–22.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Krueger AB (1992) The effect of age at school entry on educational attainment: An application of instrumental variables with moments from two samples. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87(418):328–336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Krueger AB (1995) Split-sample instrumental variables estimates of the return to schooling. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 13(2):225–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay M, Hendershott T (2003) Price discovery and trading after hours. Rev. Financial Stud. 16(4):1041–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay M, Hendershott T (2004) Liquidity externalities and adverse selection: Evidence from trading after hours. J. Finance 59(2):681–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battalio RH, Shkilko A, van Ness RA (2016) To pay or be paid? The impact of taker fees and order flow inducements on trading costs in U.S. options markets. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 51(5):1637–1662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessembinder H, Maxwell W, Venkataraman K (2006) Market transparency, liquidity externalities, and institutional trading costs in corporate bonds. J. Financial Econom. 82(2):251–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessembinder H, Panayides M, Venkataraman K (2009) Hidden liquidity: An analysis of order exposure strategies in electronic stock markets. J. Financial Econom. 94(3):361–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessembinder H, Carrion A, Tuttle L, Venkataraman K (2016) Liquidity, resiliency and market quality around predictable trades: Theory and evidence. J. Financial Econom. 121(1):142–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B, Hillion P, Spatt C (1995) An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the Paris Bourse. J. Finance 50(5):1655–1689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brolley M, Malinova K (2013) Informed trading and maker-taker fees in a low-latency limit order market. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Cardella L, Hao J, Kalcheva I (2013) Make and take fees in the U.S. equity market. Working paper, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
• Chao Y, Derdenger T (2013) Mixed bundling in two-sided markets in the presence of installed base effects. Management Sci. 59(8):1904–1926.Link, Google Scholar
• Chordia T, Roll R, Subrahmanyam A (2000) Commonality in liquidity. J. Financial Econom. 56(1):3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colliard JE, Foucault T (2012) Trading fees and efficiency in limit order markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(11):3389–3421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Copeland TE, Galai D (1983) Information effects on the bid-ask spread. J. Finance 38(5):1457–1469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coppejans M, Domowitz I, Madhavan A (2004) Resiliency in an automated auction. Working paper, Barclays Global Investors, San Francisco.Google Scholar
• Degryse H, De Jong F, Ravenswaaij MV, Wuyts G (2005) Aggressive orders and the resiliency of a limit order market. Rev. Finance 9(2):201–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Pollet JM (2009) Investor inattention and Friday earnings announcements. J. Finance 64(2):709–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster FD, Viswanathan S (1990) A theory of the interday variations in volume, variance, and trading costs in securities markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 3(4):593–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault T, Kadan O, Kandel E (2005) Limit order book as a market for liquidity. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(4):1171–1217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault T, Kadan O, Kandel E (2013) Liquidity cycles, and make/take fees in electronic markets. J. Finance 68(1):299–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault T, Kozhan R, Tham WW (2016) Toxic arbitrage. Rev. Financial Stud. 2016(hhw103), doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhw103.Google Scholar
• Glosten L, Harris L (1988) Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread. J. Financial Econom. 21(1):123–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler R, Parlour C, Rajan U (2005) Equilibrium in a dynamic limit order market. J. Finance 60(5):2149–2192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein MA, Kavajecz KA (2000) Eighths, sixteenths, and market depth: Changes in tick size and liquidity provision on the NYSE. J. Financial Econom. 56(1):125–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goyenko RY, Holden CW, Trzcinka CA (2009) Do liquidity measures measure liquidity? J. Financial Econom. 92(2):153–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris L (1990) Liquidity, trading rules, and electronic trading systems. Working paper, New York University Salomon Center Monograph Series in Finance and Economics.Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck J (2009) Trading costs and returns for U.S. equities: Estimating effective costs from daily data. J. Finance 64(3):1445–1477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Jones CM (2005) Island goes dark: Transparency, fragmentation, and regulation. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(3):743–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Mendelson H (2000) Cross networks and dealer markets: Competition and performance. J. Finance 55(5):2071–2115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T, Jones CM, Menkveld AJ (2011) Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? J. Finance 66(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Lim SS, Teoh SH (2009) Driven to distraction: Extraneous events and underreaction to earnings news. J. Finance 64(5):2289–2325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2010) Better LATE than nothing: Some comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009). J. Econom. Literature 48(2):399–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Literature 47(1): 5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozhan R, Tham WW (2012) Execution risk in high-frequency arbitrage. Management Sci. 58(11):2131–2149.Link, Google Scholar
• Large J (2007) Measuring the resiliency of an electronic limit order book. J. Financial Markets 10 (1)1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livnat J, Mendenhall R (2006) Comparing the post-earnings announcement drift for surprises calculated from analyst and time series forecasts. J. Accounting Res. 44(1):177–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malinova K, Park A (2015) Subsidizing liquidity: The impact of make/take fees on market quality. J. Finance 70(2):509–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H (1982) Market behavior in a clearing house. Econometrica 50(6):1505–1524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H (1985) Random competitive exchange: Price distributions and gains from trade. J. Econom. Theory 37(2):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H (1987) Consolidation, fragmentation and market performance. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 22(2):187–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Hara M, Ye M (2011) Is market fragmentation harming market quality? J. Financial Econom. 100(3):459–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pagano M (1989) Trading volume and asset liquidity. Quart. J. Econom. 104(2):255–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Ranaldo A (2004) Order aggressiveness in limit order book markets. J. Financial Markets 7(1):53–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roll R, Schwartz E, Subrahmanyam A (2007) Liquidity and the law of one price: The case of the futures-cash basis. J. Finance 62(5): 2201–2234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roşu I (2009) A dynamic model of the limit order book. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(11):4601–4641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roşu I (2010) Liquidity and information in order driven markets. Working paper, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 23(3):125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarkar A, Schwartz RA (2009) Market sidedness: Insights into motives from trade initiation. J. Finance 64(1):375–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seamans R, Zhu F (2014) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of Craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Skjeltorp JA, Sojli E, Tham WW (2016) Flashes of trading intent at NASDAQ. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 51(1):165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar