Advertiser Prominence Effects in Search Advertising

References

• Agarwal A, Hosanagar K, Smith MD (2011) Location, location, location: An analysis of profitability of position in online advertising markets. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):1057–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Hosanagar K, Smith MD (2015) Do organic results help or hurt sponsored search performance? Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):695–713.Link, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal G, Goel A, Motwani R (2006) Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords. Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Animesh A, Ramachandran V, Viswanathan S (2010) Quality uncertainty and the performance of online sponsored search markets: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):190–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Animesh A, Viswanathan S, Agarwal R (2011) Competing “creatively” in sponsored search markets: The effect of rank, differentiation strategy, and competition on performance. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):153–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Arkhangelsky D, Izmalkov S, Khakimova D (2013) On evaluation of CTRs of different positions in sponsored search auctions. Poster presented at the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, June 16–20, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Nekipelov D (2010) A structural model of sponsored search advertising auctions. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Athey SC, Schwaighofer A, Nekipelov D (2010) Tool for analysis of advertising auctions. U.S. Patent 8,650,084, filed June 18, 2010, and issued February 11, 2014.Google Scholar
• Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large-scale field experiment. Econometrica 83(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks N (2006) The Atlas Rank Report: How search engine rank impacts traffic. Technical report, Atlas Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Smith MD (2000) Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. 46(4):563–585.Link, Google Scholar
• Buscher G, Dumais ST, Cutrell E (2010) The good, the bad, and the random: An eye-tracking study of ad quality in web search. Proc. 33rd Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (SIGIR ’10) (ACM, New York), 42–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, He C (2011) Paid placement: Advertising and search on the Internet. Econom. J. 121(556):F309–F328.Google Scholar
• Clogg CC, Petkova E, Haritou A (1995) Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(5):1261–1293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craswell N, Zoeter O, Taylor M, Ramsey B (2008) An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. Proc. 2008 Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (ACM, New York), 87–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2007) Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):242–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fallows D (2005) Search engine users. Report, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management Sci. 55(10):1605–1622.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldberg ME, Hartwick J (1990) The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. J. Consumer Res. 17(2):172–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldman M, Rao JM (2014) Experiments as instruments: Heterogeneous position effects in sponsored search auctions. Working paper, University of California, San Diego, San Diego.Google Scholar
• Gomes R, Immorlica N, Markakis E (2009) Externalities in keyword auctions: An empirical and theoretical assessment. Leonardi S, ed. Internet and Network Economics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5929 (Springer, Berlin), 172–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y-W, Shum M, Yang S (2015) To score or not to score? Estimates of a sponsored search auctions model. Working paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Interactive Advertising Bureau (2016) IAB Internet advertising revenue report: 2015 full year results. Report, PricewaterhouseCoopers, London. https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/IAB-Internet-Advertising-Revenue-Report-FY-2015.pdf.Google Scholar
• Jerath K, Ma L, Park Y-H, Srinivasan K (2011) A “position paradox” in sponsored search auctions. Marketing Sci. 30(4):612–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeziorski P, Segal I (2015) What makes them click: Empirical analysis of consumer demand for search advertising. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 7(3):24–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karande C, Mehta A, Srikant R (2013) Optimizing budget constrained spend in search advetising. Proc. Sixth ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (WSDM ’13) (ACM, New York), 697–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Sarvary M (2010) The race for sponsored links: Bidding patterns for search advertising. Marketing Sci. 29(2):199–215.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee K (2005) Better targeting with adCenter. ClickZ (October 28), https://www.clickz.com/better-targeting-with-adcenter/47836/.Google Scholar
• msdnat (2007) Request for proposal: Beyond Search—Semantic computing and Internet economics. MSDN Österreich Blog (September 11), https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/msdnat/2007/09/11/request-for-proposal-beyond-search-semantic-computing-and-internet-economics/.Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Kalyanam K (2015) Position effects in search advertising and their moderators: A regression discontinuity approach. Marketing Sci. 34(3):388–407.Link, Google Scholar
• Nekipelov D (2014) Eliciting preferences of sponsored search advertisers: Implications for mechanism design. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 13(1):72–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pham MT, Johar GV (2001) Market prominence biases in sponsor identification: Processes and consequentiality. Psych. Marketing 18(2):123–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R, Wedel M (2004) Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text-size effects. J. Marketing 68(2):36–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pin F, Key P (2011) Stochastic variability in sponsored search auctions: Observations and models. Proc. 12th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (EC ’11) (ACM, New York), 61–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richardson M, Dominowska E, Ragno R (2007) Predicting clicks: Estimating the click-through rate for new ads. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, (WWW ’07) (ACM, New York), 521–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE, Sonnier GP (2012) A latent instrumental variables approach to modeling keyword conversion in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 49(3):306–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz B (2005) Targeting search ads by demographics and behavior. Search Engine Roundtable (December 5), https://www.seroundtable.com/archives/002904.html.Google Scholar
• Simonov A, Nosko C, Rao JM (2015) Competition and crowd-out for brand keywords in sponsored search. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ursu RM (2015) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effects of rankings on online consumer search and choice. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2007) Position auctions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 25(6):1163–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang S, Ghose A (2010) Analyzing the relationship between organic and sponsored search advertising: Positive, negative, or zero interdependence? Marketing Sci. 29(4):602–623.Link, Google Scholar