Cost Drivers of Versioning: Pricing and Product Line Strategies for Information Goods

References

• August TW, Niculescu MF, Shin H (2014) Cloud implications on software network structure and security risks. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):489–510.Link, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Bergstrom T (2005) Log-concave probability and its applications. Econom. Theory 25(2):445–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava HK, Choudhary V (2008) Research note: When is versioning optimal for information goods? Management Sci. 54(5):1029–1035.Link, Google Scholar
• Boehm B, Abts C, Chulani S (2000) Software development cost estimation approaches—A survey. Ann. Software Engrg. 10(1):177–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2005) Managing piracy: Pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):400–417.Link, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2010) Mechanism design for “free” but “no free disposal” services: The economics of personalization under privacy concerns. Management Sci. 56(10):1766–1780.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-J, Seshadri S (2007) Product development and pricing strategy for information goods under heterogenous outside opportunities. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):150–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan RM, Freimer ML (2003) Consumers prefer bundled add-ins. J. Management Inform. Systems 20(2):99–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhebar A (1990) Cambridge Software Corporation. HBS Case 191-072, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Essegaier S, Gupta S, Zhang ZJ (2002) Pricing access services. Marketing Sci. 21(2):139–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahn JH (2000) Monopoly quality differentiation with top-quality dependent fixed costs. Unpublished thesis, Keele University, Newcastle, UK.Google Scholar
• Jones R, Mendelson H (2011) Information goods vs. industrial goods: Cost structure and competition. Management Sci. 57(1):164–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Martimort D (2001) The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lahiri A, Dey D (2013) Effects of piracy on quality of information goods. Management Sci. 59(1):245–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A (1992) Equilibrium theory with possibly satiated preferences. Majumdar M, ed. Equilibrium and Dynamics: Essays in Honor of David Gale (St. Martin’s Press, New York), 201–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR (1995) Microeconomic Theory (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Milian M (2010) “Junkware” comes standard on Verizon, T-Mobile smart phones. Los Angeles Times (July 15), http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2010/07/android-junkware.html.Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niculescu MF, Wu DJ (2014) Economics of free under perpetual licensing: Implications for the software industry. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):173–199.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian HR (2013) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Harvard Business Review Press, Brighton, MA).Google Scholar
• Srinagesh P, Bradburd RM (1989) Quality distortion by a discriminating monopolist. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(1):96–105.Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2004) Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Sci. 50(12):1660–1673.Link, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1997) Versioning information goods. Kahin B, Varian HR, eds. Internet Publishing and Beyond: Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wei XD, Nault BR (2013) Experience information goods: “Version-to-upgrade.” Decision Support Systems 56(December):494–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei XD, Nault BR (2014) Monopoly versioning of information goods when consumers have group tastes. Production Oper. Management 23(6):1067–1081.Crossref, Google Scholar