Ideation–Execution Transition in Product Development: An Experimental Analysis

References

• Anderson G (1996) Nonparametric test of stochastic dominance in income distribution. Econometrica 64(5):1183–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Wertenbroch K (2002) Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psych. Sci. 13(3):219–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• A Steady Pulse (2014) School year underway! (February), http://www.iu13.org/images/uploads/documents/IS/PULSE/PULSE_newsletter_Feb2014.pdf.Google Scholar
• Athey S, Imbens G (2016) Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113(27):7353–7360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell GD (1967) Organizations and Human Behavior. A Book of Readings (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Krishnan V, Mahajan V (1998) Managing new product definition in highly dynamic environment. Management Sci. (44):50–64.Link, Google Scholar
• Biazzo S (2009) Flexibility, structuration, and simultaneity in new product development. J. Product Innovation Management 26(3):336–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau J, Hopp W, Mcclain JO, Thomas LJ (2003) On the interface between operations and human resources management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5(3):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Choo AS (2014) Defining problems fast and slow: The U-shaped effect of problem definition time on project duration. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1462–1479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Eliashberg J, Ho T-H (1996) New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. 42(2):173–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper RG, Edgett SG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1997) Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders—I. Res. Tech. Management 40(5):16–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuzick J (1985) A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Statist. Medicine 4(1):87–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Plenum, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Aronson JE, Heninger WG, Walker ED (1999) Structuring time and task in electronic brainstorming. MIS Quart. 23(1):95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Valacich JS, Connolly T, Wynne BE (1996) Process structuring in electronic brainstorming. Inform. Systems Res. 7(2):268–277.Link, Google Scholar
• Dow SP, Heddleston K, Klemmer SR (2009) The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints. Proc. Seventh ACM Conf. Creativity Cognition, Vol. 165 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncker K (1945) On problem-solving. Psych. Monographs 58(5):1–120.Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Erat S (2012) Making the best even better: How idea pool structure can make the top ideas exceptional. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1983389.Google Scholar
• Erat S, Krishnan V (2012) Managing delegated search over design spaces. Management Sci. 58(3):606–623.Link, Google Scholar
• Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1992) Creative Cognition: Theory, Research and Applications, Vol. 5 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Fishbach A, Dhar R, Zhang Y (2006) Subgoals as substitutes or complements: The role of goal accessibility. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(2):232–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJG (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31(1):9–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJG (1989) Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Acad. Management J. 32(2):274–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJG (1991) Change theories: Revolutionary exploration of the punctuated paradigm. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):10–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1980) Work Redesign (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Herz H, Schunk D, Zehnder C (2014) How do judgmental overconfidence and overoptimism shape innovative activity? Games Econom. Behav. 83:1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian J. Statist. 6(2):65–70.Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M (1995) Shooting the rapids: Managing product development in turbulent environments. Calif. Management Rev. 38(1):37–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(6):995–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram G, Krishnan V (1997) deliberate product definition: Customizing the product definition process. J. Marketing Res. 34(2):276–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT (2011) Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. 57(1):107–128.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. 47(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Eppinger SD, Whitney DE (1997) Model-based framework product to overlap development activities. Management Sci. 43(4):437–451.Link, Google Scholar
• Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. Krishnan I, ed. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA), 278–292.Google Scholar
• List JA, Shaikh AM, Xu Y (2016) Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics. NBER Working Paper 21875, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Terwiesch C (1999) Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: Capacity and congestion effects. J. Product Innovation Management 16(2):145–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psychologist 57(9):705–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maccormack A, Verganti R, Iansiti M (2001) Developing products on internet time: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. 47(1):133–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1988) The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: External vs. internal technology. Management Sci. 34(10):1157–1168.Link, Google Scholar
• Maxwell JA (2012) Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Moreau CP, Dahl DW (2005) Designing the solution: The impact of constraints on consumers’ creativity. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng P, Wong WK, Xiao Z (2011) Stochastic dominance via quantile regression. Working Paper Series 11-01, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Uncu O (2013) Competing on time: An integrated framework to optimize dynamic time-to-market and production decisions. Production Oper. Management 22(3):473–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parvan K, Rahmandad H, Haghani A (2015) Inter-phase feedbacks in construction projects. J. Oper. Management 39(November):48–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pasmore WA (1988) Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical Systems Perspective, Vol. 6 (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Saldaña J (2011) Fundamentals of Qualitative Research (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sawyer K (2012) Explaining Creativity, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sethi R, Iqbal Z (2008) Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products. J. Marketing 72(1):118–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Perry-Smith JE (2001) Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL (1991) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Loch CH (1999) Managing the process of engineering change orders: The case of the climate control system in automobile development. J. Product Innovation Management 16(2):160–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (1998) Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Sci. 44(6):743–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2011) Product Design and Development, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Verganti R (1999) Planned flexibility: Linking anticipation and reaction in PD projects. J. Product Innovation Management 16(4):363–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster DM, Kruglanski AW (1994) Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(6):1049–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright SC, Clark KB (1992) Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar