An Experimental Investigation of Managing Quality Through Monetary and Relational Incentives

References

• Babich V, Tang CS (2012) Managing opportunistic supplier product adulteration: Deferred payments, inspection, and combined mechanisms. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 14(2):301–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Baiman S, Netessine S, Kunreuther H (2004) Procurement in supply chains when the end-product exhibits the “weakest link” property. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balachandran KR, Radhakrishnan S (2005) Quality implications of warranties in a supply chain. Management Sci. 51(8):1266–1277.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Ahn HS, Leider S (2015) The signaling and incentive effects of supplier awards. Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S (2008) Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: Evidence from economic experiments. Science 320(5883):1605–1609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S, Polanía-Reyes S (2012) Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements? J. Econom. Literature 50(2):368–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CEB (2014) 8 steps for managing quality in contract manufacturing. CEB Blogs, Procurement & Operations (June 3), https://www.cebglobal.com/blogs/8-steps-to-manage-quality-in-contract-manufacturing/.Google Scholar
• Chao GH, Iravani SM, Savaskan RC (2009) Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts. Management Sci. 55(7):1122–1138.Link, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Kuhn P (2010) Lab labor: What can labor economists learn from the lab? Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A (North Holland, Amsterdam), 229–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri S (2013) Protect yourself when outsourcing to China. Wall Street Journal (August 18), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323681904578639461757495312.Google Scholar
• Chen L, Lee HL (2017) Sourcing under supplier responsibility risk: The effects of certification, audit, and contingency payment. Management Sci. 63(9):2795–2812.Link, Google Scholar
• ChinaImportal (2014) Managing supplier relationships in China—7 keys to success. ChinaImportal, Strategy and Processes (blog) (May 26), http://www.chinaimportal.com/blog/managing-supplier-relationships-in-china-7-keys-to-success/.Google Scholar
• Eppen GD, Iyer AV (1997) Backup agreements in fashion buying—The value of upstream flexibility. Management Sci. 43(11):1469–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) (2016) Hy-Vee voluntarily recalls six trail mix products due to possible health risk. Press release, May 22, http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm502543.htm.Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2000) Fairness, incentives, and contractual choices. Eur. Econom. Rev. 44(4–6):1057–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (2004) Fairness and incentives in a multi-task principal–agent model. Scandinavian J. Econom. 106(3):453–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fung VK, Fung WK, Wind Y (2008) Competing in a Flat World: Building Enterprises for a Borderless World (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Kessler E, Königstein M (2011) The role of incentives and voluntary cooperation for contractual compliance. IZA Discussion Paper 5774, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (2005) Incentives between firms (and within). Management Sci. 51(1):2–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Netessine S (2014) The Risk-Driven Business Model: Four Questions That Will Define Your Company (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han S, Wilson D, Dant S (1993) Buyer-supplier relationships today. Indust. Marketing Management 22(4):331–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holt CA, Laury SK (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(5):1644–1655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irlenbusch B, Sliwka D (2005) Incentives, decision frames, and motivation crowding out—An experimental investigation. IZA Discussion Paper 1758, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
• Kalwani M, Narayandas N (1995) Long-term manufacturer supplier relationships: Do they pay off for supplier firms? J. Marketing 59(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaya M, Özer Ö (2009) Quality risk in outsourcing: Noncontractibile product quality and private quality cost information. Naval Res. Logist. 56(7):669–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klapper L, Laeven L, Rajan R (2010) Trade credit contracts. Policy Research Working Paper 5328, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Lee YW, Stowe JD (1993) Product risk, asymmetric information, and trade credit. J. Finance Quant. Anal. 28(2):285–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mu L, Dawande M, Geng X, Mookerjee V (2016) Milking the quality test: Improving the milk supply chain under competing collection intermediaries. Management Sci. 62(5):1259–1277.Link, Google Scholar
• Nosenzo D, Offerman T, Sefton M, van der Veen A (2016) Discretionary sanctions and rewards in the repeated inspection game. Management Sci. 62(2):502–517.Link, Google Scholar
• Oblicore (2007) 2007 service-level management survey: Results, trends and analysis. Technical report, Oblicore, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
• Reyniers DJ, Tapiero CS (1995) The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producer contracts. Management Sci. 41(10):1581–1589.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Murnighan JK (1978) Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoner’s dilemma. J. Math. Psych. 17(2):189–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin J, Sheremeta R (2016) Principal–agent settings with random shocks. Management Sci. 62(4):985–999.Link, Google Scholar
• Rui H, Lai G (2015) Sourcing with deferred payment and inspection under supplier product adulteration risk. Production Oper. Management 24(6):934–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saito K (2013) Social preferences under risk: Equality of opportunity versus equality of outcome. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):3084–3101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherefkin R (2002) Ford blames its suppliers for quality problems, demands improvement. Automotive News (May 27), http://autoweek.com/article/car-news/ford-blames-its-suppliers-quality-problems-demands-improvement.Google Scholar
• Stallkamp TT (2005) SCORE! A Better Way to Business (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Plambeck EL (2007a) Simple relational contracts to motivate capacity investment: Price only vs. price and quantity. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 9(1):94–113.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Plambeck EL (2007b) Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1577–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsay AA, Lovejoy WS (1999) Quantity flexible contracts and supply chain performance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 1(2):89–111.Link, Google Scholar
• Tunca TI, Zenios SA (2006) Supply auctions and relational contracts for procurement. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 8(1):43–67.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Zhang RQ, Tsung F (2007) Pushing quality improvement along supply chains. Management Sci. 53(3):421–436.Link, Google Scholar