Competitive Intensity and Its Two-Sided Effect on the Boundaries of Firm Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2737

References

  • Adegbesan JA (2008) On the origins of competitive advantage: Strategic factor markets and heterogeneous resource complementarity. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):463–475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adegbesan JA, Higgins MJ (2011) The intra-alliance division of value created through collaboration. Strategic Management J. 32(2):187–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adner R, Zemsky P (2006) A demand-based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 27(3):215–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann R (1973) Disadvantageous monopolies. J. Econom. Theory 6(1):1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennett V (2013) Organization and bargaining: Sales process choice at auto dealerships. Management Sci. 59(9):2003–2018.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bondareva ON (1962) Theory of the core in the n-person game. Vestnik 13:141–142.Google Scholar
  • Brandenburger A, Stuart H (1996) Value-based business strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 5(1):5–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandenburger A, Stuart H (2007) Biform games. Management Sci. 53(4):537–549.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chatain O (2011) Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Strategic Management J. 32(1):76–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatain O, Mindruta D (2017) Estimating value creation from revealed preferences: Application to value-based strategies. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1964–1985.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatain O, Zemsky P (2007) The horizontal scope of the firm: Organizational tradeoffs vs. buyer-supplier relationships. Management Sci. 53(4):550–565.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chatain O, Zemsky P (2011) Value creation and value capture with frictions. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1206–1231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edgeworth FY (1881) Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences (C. Kegan Paul & Company, London).Google Scholar
  • Fudenberg D, Levine DK (1998) The Theory of Learning in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Gans J, Ryall MD (2016) Value capture theory: A strategic management review. Strategic Management J. 38(1):17–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gans J, MacDonald G, Ryall MD (2008) The two sides of competition and their implications for strategy. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  • Grennan M (2014) Bargaining ability and competitive advantage: Empirical evidence from medical devices. Management Sci. 60(12):3011–3025.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jia N, Shi J, Wang Y (2012) Value creation and value capture in corporate governance: Using the value-based approach to analyze an ownership reform of China’s listed firms. Working paper, USC Marshall School of Business, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • MacDonald G, Ryall MD (2004) How do value creation and competition determine whether a firm appropriates value? Management Sci. 50(10):1319–1333.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacDonald G, Ryall MD (2017) Do new competitors, new customers, new suppliers, …sustain, destroy or create competitive advantage? Strategic Management J. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Makowski L (1980) A characterization of perfectly competitive economies with production. J. Econom. Theory 22(2):208–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makowski L, Ostroy JM (2001) Perfect competition and the creativity of the market. J. Econom. Literature 39(2):479–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Obloj T, Capron L (2011) Role of resource gap and value appropriation: Effect of reputation gap on price premium in online auctions. Strategic Management J. 32(4):447–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostroy J (1980) The no-surplus condition as a characterization of perfectly competitive equilibrium. J. Econom. Theory 22(2):183–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME (1979) How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 57(2):137–145.Google Scholar
  • Postlewaite A, Rosenthal RW (1974) Disadvantageous syndicates. J. Econom. Theory 9(3):324–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quant M, Borm P, Reijnierse H, van Velzen B (2005) The core cover in relation to the nucleolus and the Weber set. Internat. J. Game Theory 33(4):491–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryall MD, Sorenson O (2007) Brokers and competitive advantage. Management Sci. 53(4):566–583.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart HW Jr (1997) The supplier–firm–buyer game and its m-sided generalization. Math. Soc. Sci. 34(1):21–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart HW Jr (2005) Biform analysis of inventory competition. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 7(4):347–359.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart HW Jr (2016) Value gaps and profitability. Strategy Sci. 1(1):56–70.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tijs S, Lipperts F (1982) The hypercube and the core cover of n-person cooperative games. Cahiers du Centre d'Études de Researche Opérationelle 24:27–37.Google Scholar
  • von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.