Range-Dependent Utility

References

• Abbas AE, Matheson JE (2009) Normative decision making with multiattribute performance targets. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 16(3-4):67–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allais M (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ècole américaine. Econometrica 21(4):503–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker JL, Sarin RK (1987) Lottery dependent utility. Management Sci. 33(11):1367–1382.Link, Google Scholar
• Bennett P, Brennan M, Kearns Z (2003) Psychological aspects of price: An empirical test of order and range effects. Marketing Bull. 14:1–8.Google Scholar
• Birnbaum MH (2004) Tests of rank-dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory in gambles represented by natural frequencies: Effects of format, event framing, and branch splitting. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 95(1):40–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordley R, LiCalzi M (2000) Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions Econom. Finance 23(1):53–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF (1989) An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. J. Risk Uncertainty 2(1):61–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (1993) Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (William Morrow and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Cohen M (1992) Security level, potential level, expected utility: A three-criteria decision model under risk. Theory Decision 33(2):101–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlisk J (1989) Three variants on the Allais example. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(3):392–407.Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Sadiraj V (2006) Small-and large-stakes risk aversion: Implications of concavity calibration for decision theory. Games Econom. Behav. 56(1):45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards W (1954) The theory of decision making. Psych. Bull. 51(4):380–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman M, Savage LJ (1948) The utility analysis of choices involving risk. J. Political Econom. 56(4):279–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harless DW (1992) Predictions about indifference curves inside the unit triangle: A test of variants of expected utility theory. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 18(3):391–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harless DW, Camerer C (1994) The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica 62(6):1251–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey JD, Orme C (1994) Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica 62(6):1291–1326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C, Lichtenstein DR (1999) A range theory account of price perception. J. Consumer Res. 25(4):353–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kontek K (2011) On mental transformations. J. Neuroscience, Psych., Econom. 4(4):235–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kontek K (2016) Continuous or discontinuous? Estimating indifference curves inside the Marschak-Machina triangle using certainty equivalents. Working paper, Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2575526.Google Scholar
• Kotz S, van Dorp J (2004) Beyond Beta: Other Continuous Families of Distributions with Bounded Support and Applications (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawless HT, Heymann H (1998) Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices (Chapman & Hall, New York).Google Scholar
• Lewandowski M (2013) Risk attitudes, buying and selling price for a lottery and simple strategies. Central Eastern Eur. J. Econom. Model. Econometrics 5:1–34.Google Scholar
• Lewandowski M (2014) Buying and selling price for risky lotteries and expected utility theory with gambling wealth. J. Risk Uncertainty 48(3):253–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (1952) The utility of wealth. J. Political Econom. 60(2):151–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niedrich RW, Sharma S, Wedell DH (2001) Reference price and price perceptions: A comparison of alternative models. J. Consumer Res. 28(3):339–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palacios-Huerta I, Serrano R (2006) Rejecting small gambles under expected utility. Econom. Lett. 91(2):250–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parducci A (1965) Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psych. Rev. 72(6):407–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parducci A (1995) Happiness, Pleasure, and Judgment: The Contextual Theory and Its Applications (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (2000) Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68(5):1281–1292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayo L, Becker GS (2007) Evolutionary efficiency and happiness. J. Political Econom. 115(2):302–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robson AJ (2002) Evolution and human nature. J. Econom. Perspect. 16(2):89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2012) Lecture Notes in Microeconomic Theory: The Economic Agent (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Safra Z, Segal U (1998) Constant risk aversion. J. Econom. Theory 83(1):19–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savage CJ (1954) The Foundation of Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Sopher B, Gigliotti G (1993) A test of generalized expected utility theory. Theory Decision 35(1):75–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C (2000) Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature 38(2):332–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart N, Reimers S, Harris AJ (2014) On the origin of utility, weighting, and discounting functions: How they get their shapes and how to change their shapes. Management Sci. 61(3):687–705.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Neumann LJ, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Webster MA, Werner JS, Field DJ (2005) Adaptation and the phenomenology of perception. Clifford C, Rhodes G, eds. Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High Level Vision: Advances in Visual Cognition Series, Vol. 2 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 241–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaari ME (1987) The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeung CW, Soman D (2005) Attribute evaluability and the range effect. J. Consumer Res. 32(3):363–369.Crossref, Google Scholar