Promoting Change from the Outside: Directing Managerial Attention in the Implementation of Environmental Improvements

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2748

References

  • Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal A, Muthulingam S (2015) Does organizational forgetting affect vendor quality performance? An empirical investigation. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 17(3):350–367.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anand G, Gray J, Siemsen E (2012) Decay, shock, and renewal: Operational routines and process entropy in the pharmaceutical industry. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1700–1716.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson ST, Newell RG (2004) Information programs for technology adoption: The case of energy-efficiency audits. Resource Energy Econom. 26(1):27–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 47(1):93–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartley T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(2):297–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blass V, Corbett CJ, Delmas MA, Muthulingam S (2014) Top management and the adoption of energy efficiency practices: Evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in the US. Energy 65(1):560–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradburn MJ, Clark TG, Love SB, Altman DG (2003a) Survival analysis Part II: Multivariate data analysis—An introduction to concepts and methods. British J. Cancer 89(3):431–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradburn MJ, Clark TG, Love SB, Altman DG (2003b) Survival analysis Part III: Multivariate data analysis—Choosing a model and assessing its adequacy and fit. British J. Cancer 89(4):605–611.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cader HA, Leatherman JC (2011) Small business survival and sample selection bias. Small Bus. Econom. 37(2):155–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charles D (2009) Leaping the efficiency gap. Science 325(5942):804–811.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colvin M, Cullen FT, Ven TV (2002) Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus. Criminology 40(1):19–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 34(2):187–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R, March J (1963)A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Darnall N, Seol I, Sarkis J (2009) Perceived stakeholder influences and organizations’ use of environmental audits. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 34(2):170–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeCanio SJ (1993) Barriers within firms to energy-efficient investments. Energy Policy 21(9):906–914.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeCanio SJ (1998) The efficiency paradox: Bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments. Energy Policy 26(5):441–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Environmental Protection Agency (2011a) Compliance and enforcement annual results 2011 fiscal year. Accessed December 19,2013, http://www.epa.gov/Compliance/resources/reports/endofyear/eoy2011/index.html.Google Scholar
  • Environmental Protection Agency (2011b) Technical assistance: 2013. Accessed October 13, 2013, http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/p2home/pubs/assist/index.htm.Google Scholar
  • Environmental Protection Agency (2013) Health and environmental agencies of U.S. states and territories. Accessed XXX, http://www2.epa.gov/home/state-and-territorial-environmental-agencies.Google Scholar
  • Food and Drug Administration (2013) FDA fiscal year 2013 justification of estimates for appropriations committees. Report, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/BudgetReports/UCM291555.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Ford JD, Ford LW (1994) Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):756–785.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foulon J, Lanoie P, Laplante B (2002) Incentives for pollution control: Regulation or information? J. Environment. Econom. Management 44(1):169–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guajardo JA, Cohen MA, Kim S-H, Netessine S (2012) Impact of performance-based contracting on product reliability: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 58(5):961–979.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hart SL (1997) Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(1):66–76.Google Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Rhee M (2004) The role of volition in organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls. Management Sci. 50(11):1545–1560.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman AJ, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karpoff JM, Lott JR Jr, Wehrly EW (2005) The reputational penalties for environmental violations: Empirical evidence. J. Law Econom. 48(2):653–675.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiefer NM (1988) Economic duration data and hazard functions. J. Econom. Literature 26(2):646–679.Google Scholar
  • King A, Lenox M (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48(2):289–299.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak A (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1091–1106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen RD, Whybark DC (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad. Management J. 42(6):599–615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klassen RD, Vachon S (2003) Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: The impact on plant-level environmental investment. Production Oper. Management 12(3):336–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein KJ, Sorra JS (1996) The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1055–1080.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koehler DA (2007) The effectiveness of voluntary environmental programs—A policy at a crossroads? Policy Stud. J. 35(4):689–722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn A (1993) Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(5):54–63.Google Scholar
  • Kraft T, Zheng Y, Erhun F (2013) The NGO’s dilemma: How to influence firms to replace a potentially hazardous substance. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):649–669.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krause DR, Handfield RB, Scannell TV (1998) An empirical investigation of supplier development: Reactive and strategic processes. J. Oper. Management 17(1):39–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine DI, Toffel MW (2010) Quality management and job quality: How the ISO 9001 standard for quality management systems affects employees and employers. Management Sci. 56(6):978–996.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala GS (1986) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Mainhard MT, Brekelmans M, Wubbels T (2011) Coercive and supportive teacher behaviour: Within- and across-lesson associations with the classroom social climate. Learn. Instruction 21(3):345–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Modi SB, Mabert VA (2007) Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer. J. Oper. Management 25(1):42–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muthulingam S, Corbett CJ, Benartzi S, Oppenheim B (2013) Energy efficiency in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms: Order effects and the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(4):596–615.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (2003) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Plambeck EL, Taylor TA (2015) Supplier evasion of a buyer’s audit: Implications for motivating supplier social and environmental responsibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(2):184–197.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K, Randall T (2008) Does component sharing help or hurt reliability? An empirical study in the automotive industry. Management Sci. 54(5):922–938.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Romanelli E, Tushman ML (1994) Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Acad. Management J. 37(5):1141–1166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothenberg S, Becker M (2004) Technical assistance programs and the diffusion of environmental technologies in the printing industry: The case of SMEs. Bus. Soc. 43(4):366–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau S (2007) Timing of environmental inspections: Survival of the compliant. J. Regulatory Econom. 32(1):17–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sánchez-Rodríguez C, Hemsworth D, Martínez-Lorente ÁR (2005) The effect of supplier development initiatives on purchasing performance: A structural model. Supply Chain Management: Internat. J. 10(4):289–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarkis J, Gonzalez-Torre P, Adenso-Diaz B (2010) Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. J. Oper. Management 28(2):163–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shimshack JP, Ward MB (2005) Regulator reputation, enforcement, and environmental compliance. J. Environment. Econom. Management 50(3):519–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW (2008) Coerced confessions: Self-policing in the shadow of the regulator. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 24(1):45–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW (2010) Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):361–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW, Hugill AR (2016) Monitoring global supply chains. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1878–1897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1979) Rational decision making in business organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 69(4):493–513.Google Scholar
  • Simpson M, Taylor N, Barker K (2004) Environmental responsibility in SMEs: Does it deliver competitive advantage? Bus. Strategy Environment 13(3):156–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence DB (2001) The shadow of the rational polluter: Rethinking the role of rational actor models in environmental law. Calif. Law Rev. 89(4):917–998.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sroufe R (2003) Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production Oper. Management 12(3):416–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sterman JD, Repenning NP, Kofman F (1997) Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Sci. 43(4):503–521.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Toffel MW, Short J (2011) Coming clean and cleaning up: Does voluntary self-reporting indicate effective self-policing? J. Law Econom. 54(3):609–649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyre MJ, Orlikowski WJ (1994) Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. 5(1):98–118.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Victor B, Boynton A, Stephens-Jahng T (2000) The effective design of work under total quality management. Organ. Sci. 11(1):102–117.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walls D (2013) National establishment time series. Database, Walls & Associates, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.