How Does Advertising Depend on Competition? Evidence from U.S. Brewing

References

• Aghion P, Bloom N, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester D (2013) Advertising in a competitive market: The role of product standards, customer learning, and switching costs. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):489–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter O, Hosken D, Weinberg M (2014) Did Robert Bork understate the competitive impact of mergers? Evidence from consummated mergers. J. Law Econom. 57(S3):S67–S100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter OC, Hosken D, Weinberg MC (2015) Efficiencies brewed: Pricing and consolidation in the U.S. beer industry. RAND J. Econom. 46(2):328–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Armstron M, Porter R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1701–1844.Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KM (1993) A simple theory of advertising as a good or bad. Quart. J. Econom. 108(4):941–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buxton AJ, Davies SW, Lyons BR (1984) Concentration and advertising in consumer and producer markets. J. Indust. Econom. 32(4):451–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Center for Science in the Public Interest (2008) Alcohol policies project fact sheet. Accessed January 7, https://web.archive.org/web/20150908001609/https://cspinet.org/booze/FactSheets/AlcAdExp.pdf.Google Scholar
• Comanor WS, Wilson TA (1974) Advertising and Market Power (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Dafny L, Duggan M, Ramanarayanan S (2012) Paying a premium on your premium? Consolidation in the U.S. health insurance industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):1161–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doganoglu T, Klapper D (2006) Goodwill and dynamic advertising strategies. Quant. Marketing Econom. 4(1):5–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorfman R, Steiner PO (1954) Optimal advertising and optimal quality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 44(5):826–836.Google Scholar
• Draganska M, Mazzeo M, Seim K (2009) Beyond plain vanilla: Modeling joint product assortment and pricing decisions. QME 7(2):105–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Manchanda P (2005) An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(2):107–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elzinga KG, Tremblay CH, Tremblay VJ (2015) Craft beer in the United States: History, numbers, and geography. J. Wine Econom. 10(03):242–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans WN, Froeb LM, Werden GJ (1993) Endogeneity in the concentration—Price relationship: Causes, consequences, and cures. J. Indust. Econom. 41(4):431–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y (2013) Ownership consolidation and product characteristics: A study of the U.S. daily newspaper market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(5):1598–1628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Pautler PA, Vita MG (2009) Economics at the FTC: Retrospective merger analysis with a focus on hospitals. Rev. Indust. Organ. 35(4):369–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freimer M, Horsky D (2012) Periodic advertising pulsing in a competitive market. Marketing Sci. 31(4):637–648.Link, Google Scholar
• George LM (2009) National television and the market for local products: The case of beer. J. Indust. Econom. 57(1):85–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Gordon BR (2011) Does AMD spur Intel to innovate more? J. Political Econom. 119(6):1141–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Gordon BR (2014) Competition and product innovation in dynamic oligopoly. Quant. Marketing Econom. 12(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greer DF (1971) Advertising and market concentration. Southern Econom. J. 38(1):19–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RE (2013) What the cyclical response of advertising reveals about markups and other macroeconomic wedges. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Klapper D (2018) Super Bowl ads. Marekting Sci. 37(1):78–96.Link, Google Scholar
• Hastings JS, Gilbert RJ (2005) Market power, vertical integration and the wholesale price of gasoline. J. Indust. Econom. 53(4):469–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heerde HJV, Gijsenberg MJ, Dekimpe MG, Steenkamp J-BE (2013) Price and advertising effectiveness over the business cycle. J. Marketing Res. 50(2):177–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyer K, Shapiro C, Wilder J (2009) The year in review: Economics at the antitrust division, 2008–2009. Rev. Indust. Organ. 35(4):349–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis R, Nguyen D (2015) Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1890) Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London).Google Scholar
• Mazzeo M, Seim K, Varela M (2014) The welfare consequences of mergers with endogenous product choice. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Miller NH, Weinberg MC (2017) Understanding the price effects of the MillerCoors joint venture. Econometrica 85(6):1763–1791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molinari B, Turino F (2009) Advertising and business cycle fluctuations. Working Paper AD 2009-09, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
• Mueller WF, Rogers RT (1980) The role of advertising in changing concentration of manufacturing industries. Rev. Econom. Statist. 62(1):89–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller WF, Rogers RT (1984) Changes in market concentration of manufacturing industries. Rev. Indust. Organ. 1(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picard RG (2001) Effects of recessions on advertising expenditures: An exploratory study of economic downturns in nine developed nations. J. Media Econom. 14(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2016) Advertising spillovers: Evidence from online field experiments and implications for returns on advertising. J. Marketing Res. 53(4):459–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sass TR, Saurman DS (1995) Advertising restrictions and concentration: The case of malt beverages. Rev. Econom. Statist. 77(1):66–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro BT (2018) Positive spillovers and free riding in advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals: The case of antidepressants. J. Political Econom. 126(1):381–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinkinson M, Starc A (2015) Ask your doctor? Direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BE, Fang E (2011) The impact of economic contractions on the effectiveness of R&D and advertising: Evidence from U.S. companies spanning three decades. Marketing Sci. 30(4):628–645.Link, Google Scholar
• Sutton J (1991) Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration (MIT Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Tankersley J (2016) How the Bible Belt got down with craft beer. Washington Post (August 26), https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/how-the-bible-belt-got-down-with-craft-beer/2016/08/26/39863156-4536-11e6-88d0-6adee48be8bc_story.html?utm_term=.e36f489ca0e9.Google Scholar
• Telser LG (1964) Advertising and competition. J. Political Econom. 72(6):537–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tremblay CH, Tremblay VJ (1995) Advertising, price, and welfare: Evidence from the U.S. brewing industry. Southern Econom. J. 62(2):367–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tremblay VJ, Tremblay CH (2005) The U.S. Brewing Industry (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Tremblay CH, Tremblay VJ, Swinnen J, et al. (2011) Recent economic developments in the import and craft segment of the U.S. brewing industry. Swinnen J, ed. The Economics of Beer, Chap. 8 (Oxford University Press, New York). 141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uri ND (1988) A re-examination of the relationship between industry structure and economic performance. Appl. Econom. 20(10):1383–1400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wollmann T (2018) Trucks without bailouts: Equilibrium product characteristics for commercial vehicles. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(6):1364–1406.Crossref, Google Scholar