Do Coupons Expand or Cannibalize Revenue? Evidence from an e-Market

References

• Anderson ET, Dana JD Jr (2009) When is price discrimination profitable? Management Sci. 55(6):980–989.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Välimäki J (1997) Market diffusion with two-sided learning. RAND J. Econom. 28(4):773–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bester H, Petrakis E (1996) Coupons and oligopolistic price discrimination. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 14(2):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blystone D (2016) Can Groupon make a comback in 2016? Investopedia (January 13), http://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/011316/can-groupon-make-comeback-2016.asp.Google Scholar
• Byers JW, Mitzenmacher M, Zervas G (2012a) Daily deals: Prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications. Proc. Fifth ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search and Data Mining (ACM, New York), 543–552.Google Scholar
• Byers JW, Mitzenmacher M, Zervas G (2012b) The Groupon effect on Yelp ratings: A root cause analysis. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 248–265.Google Scholar
• Chief Marketer (2013) Groupon owns nearly 60% of the U.S. daily-deals market in 2013, industry to see slowed growth. (September 3), http://www.chiefmarketer.com/report-groupon-owns-nearly-60-of-the-daily-deals-market-in-2013.Google Scholar
• Ching AT (2010a) Consumer learning and heterogeneity: Dynamics of demand for prescription drugs after patent expiration. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(6):619–638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching AT (2010b) A dynamic oligopoly structural model for the prescription drug market after patent expiration. Internat. Econom. Rev. 51(4):1175–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts KS (1998) Third-degree price discrimination in oligopoly: All-out competition and strategic commitment. RAND J. Econom. 29(2):306–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dholakia UM (2010) How effective are Groupon promotions for businesses? Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
• Dholakia UM (2011) What makes Groupon promotions profitable for businesses? Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Jaffe S, Kominers SD (2014) To Groupon or not to Groupon: The profitability of deep discounts. Marketing Lett. 27(1):39–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ForeSee (2012) Daily deal websites and emails bring in new and existing customers for retailers. ForeSee daily deal commentary, March 5, https://web.archive.org/web/20120417013451/https://www.foresee.com/research-white-papers/_downloads/daily-deal-commentary-2012-foresee.pdf.Google Scholar
• Holmes TJ (1989) The effects of third-degree price discrimination in oligopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(1):244–250.Google Scholar
• iContact (2011) One in four small businesses hates social media; iContact survey uncovers love affair with Facebook (and cooling passion for Groupon). (October 25), http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/one-in-four-small-businesses-hates-social-media-icontact-survey-uncovers-love-affair-with-facebook-and-cooling-passion-for-groupon-132522353.html.Google Scholar
• La Monica PR (2015) Amazon killing off its Local daily deals site. CNN (November 2), http://money.cnn.com/2015/11/02/technology/amazon-local-daily-deals-groupon/index.html.Google Scholar
• MacMillan D (2012) Groupon loses market share as online daily deals decline. Bloomberg (August 15), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-15/groupon-loses-market-share-as-online-daily-deals-decline.html.Google Scholar
• Moraga-González JL, Petrakis E (1999) Coupon advertising under imperfect price information. J. Econom. Management Strategy 8(4):523–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M, Rosen S (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C (1984) A price discrimination theory of coupons. Marketing Sci. 3(2):128–147.Link, Google Scholar
• National Restaurant Association (2010) 2010 restaurant industry operations report.Google Scholar
• Salant SW (1989) When is inducing self-selection suboptimal for a monopolist? Quart. J. Econom. 104(2):391–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaffer G, Zhang ZJ (1995) Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. 14(4):395–416.Link, Google Scholar
• Stole LA (2007) Price discrimination and competition. Armstrong M, Porter RH, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2221–2299.Google Scholar
• Thisse J-F, Vives X (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1989) Price discrimination. Schmalensee R, Willig R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 597–654.Crossref, Google Scholar