Referral Priority Program: Leveraging Social Ties via Operational Incentives

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3034

References

  • Adiri I, Yechiali U (1974) Optimal priority-purchasing and pricing decisions in nonmonopoly and monopoly queues. Oper. Res. 22(5):1051–1066.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Afèche P (2013) Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic delay. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 15(3):423–443.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Afèche P, Mendelson H (2004) Pricing and priority auctions in queueing systems with a generalized delay cost structure. Management Sci. 50(7):869–882.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Afèche P, Sarhangian V (2015) Rational abandonment from priority queues: Equilibrium strategy and pricing implications. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
  • Athreya KB, Ney PE (1972) Branching Processes (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balachandran KR (1972) Purchasing priorities in queues. Management Sci. 18(5):319–326.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Biyalogorsky E, Gerstner E, Libai B (2001) Customer referral management: Optimal reward programs. Marketing Sci. 20(1):82–95.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burke PJ (1975) Delays in single-server queues with batch input. Oper. Res. 23(4):830–833.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buttle FA (1998) Word of mouth: Understanding and managing referral marketing. J. Strategic Marketing 6(3):241–254.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaudhry ML, Templeton JGC (1983) A First Course in Bulk Queues (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Edelson NM, Hildebrand DK (1975) Congestion tolls for Poisson queuing processes. Econometrica 43(1):81–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fendick KW, Saksena VR, Whitt W (1989) Dependence in packet queues. IEEE Trans. Comm. 37(11):1173–1183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer W, Meier-Hellstern K (1993) The Markov-modulated Poisson process (MMPP) cookbook. Performance Eval. 18(2):149–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavirneni S, Kulkarni VG (2016) Self-selecting priority queues with Burr distributed waiting costs. Production Oper. Management 25(6):979–992.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer A, Hassin R (1986) Stable priority purchasing in queues. Oper. Res. Lett. 4(6):285–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D, Mayzlin D, Chen Y, Das S, Dellarocas C, Pfeiffer B, Libai B, Sen S, Shi M, Verlegh P (2005) The firm’s management of social interactions. Marketing Lett. 16(3):415–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamburger E (2013) Expect delays: Why today’s top apps are putting you on a wait list. The Verge (July 30), http://www.theverge.com/2013/7/30/4567794/mailbox-loom-cloud-app-wait-lists.Google Scholar
  • Hassin R (1995) Decentralized regulation of a queue. Management Sci. 41(1):163–173.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R, Haviv M (1997) Equilibrium threshold strategies: The case of queues with priorities. Oper. Res. 45(6):966–973.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hassin R, Haviv M (2003) To Queue Or Not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hawkes AG (1965) Time-dependent solution of a priority queue with bulk arrival. Oper. Res. 13(4):586–595.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jing X, Xie J (2011) Group buying: A new mechanism for selling through social interactions. Management Sci. 57(8):1354–1372.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinrock L (1967) Optimum bribing for queue position. Oper. Res. 15(2):304–318.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kornish LJ, Li Q (2010) Optimal referral bonuses with asymmetric information: Firm-offered and interpersonal incentives. Marketing Sci. 29(1):108–121.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Libai B, Biyalogorsky E, Gerstner E (2003) Setting referral fees in affiliate marketing. J. Service Res. 5(4):303–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lobel I, Sadler E, Varshney LR (2017) Customer referral incentives and social media. Management Sci. 63(10):3514–3529.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lui FT (1985) An equilibrium queueing model of bribery. J. Political Econom. 93(4):760–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marinesi S, Girotra K (2014) Information acquisition through customer voting systems. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
  • Marinesi S, Girotra K (2016) Kick-start through Kickstarter or go for Indiegogo? Design of crowdfunding systems. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
  • Mendelson H, Whang S (1990) Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1 queue. Oper. Res. 38(5):870–883.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Momot R, Belavina E, Girotra K (2017) The use and value of social network information in selective selling. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
  • Naor P (1969) The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica 37(1):15–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neuts MF (1993) The burstiness of point processes. Comm. Statist.: Stochastic Models 9(3):445–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ries E (2011) How DropBox started as a minimal viable product. TechCrunch (October 19), https://techcrunch.com/2011/10/19/dropbox-minimal-viable-product.Google Scholar
  • Roberts D (2015) How Robinhood, an investing app, is luring stock-market newbies. Fortune (March 12), http://fortune.com/2015/03/12/robinhood-investing-app.Google Scholar
  • Shontell A (2013) There is a 260,000-person wait list for a new email app. Business Insider (February 7), http://www.business insider.com/there-is-a-260000-person-wait-list-for-an-app-that-promises-to-fix-your-inbox-2013-2.Google Scholar
  • Takagi H, Takahashi Y (1991) Priority queues with batch Poisson arrivals. Oper. Res. Lett. 10(4):225–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takahashi Y, Takagi H (1990) Structured priority queue with batch arrivals. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 33(3):244–263.Google Scholar
  • Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. J. Marketing 73(5):90–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van der Hofstad R (2016) Random Graphs and Complex Networks, Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, Vol. I (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Verlegh PWJ, Ryu G, Tuk MA, Feick L (2013) Receiver responses to rewarded referrals: The motive inferences framework. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 41(6):669–682.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Cui S, Wang Z (2019) Equilibrium strategies in M/M/1 priority queues with balking. Production Oper. Management 28(1):43–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao P, Tang CS, Wirtz J (2011) Optimizing referral reward programs under impression management considerations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 215(3):730–739.Google Scholar
  • Yang L, Debo L, Gupta V (2017) Trading time in a congested environment. Management Sci. 63(7):2377–2395.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yildirim U, Hasenbein JJ (2010) Admission control and pricing in a queue with batch arrivals. Oper. Res. Lett. 38(5):427–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ziani S, Rahmoune F, Radjef MS (2015) Customers’ strategic behavior in batch arrivals M2/M/1 queue. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 247(3):895–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.