Regulations and Brain Drain: Evidence from Wall Street Star Analysts’ Career Choices
Published Online:3 Jul 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3182
References
- (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80:123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Reg-FD and the competitiveness of all-star analysts. J. Accounting Public Policy 27:295–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. J. Finance 61:1645–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Buys, holds, and sells: The distribution of investment banks’ stock ratings and the implications for the profitability of analysts’ recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. 41:87–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Do analysts practice what they preach and should investors listen? Effects of recent regulations. Accounting Rev. 84:1015–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Speech by SEC staff: Analyzing analysts. Remarks before the Committee on Federal Regulation of Securities of the American Bar Association, August 7, 2001. Accessed August 1, 2018, http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch510.htm.Google Scholar
- (2006) Analyzing the analysts after the global settlement. Fuchita Y, Litan RE, eds. Financial Gatekeepers: Can They Protect Investors? (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, and the Nomura Institute of Capital Markets Research, Tokyo), 139–171.Google Scholar
- (2002) Wall Street’s credibility problems: Misaligned incentives and dubious fixes? Litan RE, Herring RJ, eds. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC), 93–130.Google Scholar
- (2007) Investor reaction to celebrity analysts: The case of earnings forecast revisions. J. Accounting Res. 45:481–513.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Analyst information processing, financial regulation, and academic research. Accounting Rev. 84:1073–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Lessons from the Global Settlement. CFA Magazine 21:12–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Investor sentiment, disagreement, and breadth-return relationship. Management Sci. 59:1076–1091.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) NASD Rule 2711 and changes in analysts’ independence in making stock recommendations. Accounting Rev. 84:1041–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The impact of all-star analyst job changes on their coverage choices and investment banking deal flow. J. Financial Econom. 84:713–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Independents’ day? Analyst behavior surrounding the Global Settlement. Ann. Finance 7:529–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter? J. Accounting Econom. 27(3):285–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Do investors respond to analysts’ forecast revisions as if forecast accuracy is all that matters? Accounting Rev. 78:227–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Sell-side school ties. J. Finance 65:1409–1437.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) The Pied Pipers of Wall Street: How Analysts Sell You Down the River (Bloomberg Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2006) Which types of analyst firms are more optimistic? J. Accounting Econom. 41:119–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) SEC tried to ease curbs: Judge rejects bid by agency, Wall Street to soften landmark 2003 analyst deal. Wall Street Journal (March 17), www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704743404575128122174622274.Google Scholar
- (2007) Wealth transfer effects of analysts’ misleading behavior. J. Accounting Res. 45:71–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The good or the bad? Which mutual fund managers join hedge funds? Rev. Financial Stud. 24:3008–3024.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) The impact of NASD Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 on analyst behavior: The strategic timing of recommendations issued on weekends. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 43:950–975.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Factors affecting investment bank initial public offering market share. J. Financial Econom. 55:3–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Are the Wall Street analyst rankings popularity contests? J. Financial Quantitative Anal. 44:411–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The effectiveness of reputation as a disciplinary mechanism in sell-side research. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:3735–3777.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Analyst forecast revisions and market price discovery. Accounting Rev. 78:193–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Brokerage commissions and institutional trading patterns. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:5175–5212.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Testing hypotheses about interaction terms in nonlinear models. Econom. Lett. 107:291–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Buy-side vs. sell-side analysts’ earnings forecasts. Financial Analysts J. 64:25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) What drives sell-side analyst compensation at high-status investment banks? J. Accounting Res. 49:969–1000.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Conflict-of-interest reforms and investment bank analysts’ research biases. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 27:443–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased earnings forecasts. J. Finance 58:313–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Security analysts’ career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts. RAND J. Econom. 31:121–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Institutional Investor (2007) 2007 All-America Research Team. Institutional Investor (October 23), https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b150nxv1b4fst9/2007-all-america-research-team.Google Scholar
- (1999) Expertise in forecasting performance of security analysts. J. Accounting Econom. 28:51–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Conflicts of interest and stock recommendations: The effects of the global settlement and related regulations. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:4189–4271.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Congress to scrutinize analysts again. CNET (January 2), https://www.cnet.com/news/congress-to-scrutinize-analysts-again/.Google Scholar
- (2012) Testing asymmetric information asset pricing models. Rev. Financial Stud. 25:1366–1413.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010). On the economic meaning of interaction term coefficients in non-linear binary response regression models. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
- (2017) Brain drain: Are mutual funds losing their best minds? Quart. J. Finance 7:1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Why do firms switch underwriters? J. Financial Econom. 60:245–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) An economic model of the brain drain. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72:91–100.Google Scholar
- (2014) Did regulation fair disclosure, SOX and other analyst regulations reduce security mispricing? J. Accounting Res. 52:733–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007). What does it take to become a superstar? Evidence from Institutional Investor rankings of financial analysts. Working paper, University of Miami, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
- (2001) Rationality and analysts’ forecast bias. J. Finance 56:369–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The Global Settlement, all-star analyst departures, and their impact on the capital markets. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- (2007) The 2007 All-America Research Team. Institutional Investor 41(10):49–52.Google Scholar
- (2007) The economics of conflicts of interest in financial institutions. J. Financial Econom. 85:267–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Does forecast accuracy matter to security analysts? Accounting Rev. 74:185–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) SEC leader cites conflicts of analysts at large firms. New York Times (August 1), C1.Google Scholar
- (2004) Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata J. 4(2):154–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Who really moves the market? Fortune (October 27), 90–110.Google Scholar
- (2007) The cracks in the Chinese wall: Four years after SEC settlement, is Street research withering in the shadows? Investment Dealer Digest 73(9):18–22.Google Scholar
- (2009) Settling down. CFA Magazine (March–April), 41–44.Google Scholar
- (2009) Research renegades. Bloomberg Markets (November), 33–44.Google Scholar
- (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Amer. Statistician 39:33–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Securities and Exchange Commission (2004) Deutsche Securities Inc. and Thomas Weisel Partners LLC settle enforcement actions involving conflicts of interest between research and investment banking. Press release, August 26, 2004.Google Scholar
- (2014) Private interaction between firm management and sell-side analysts. J. Accounting Res. 52:245–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Reputation and performance among security analysts. J. Finance 47:1811–1736.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) What determine financial analysts’ career outcomes during mergers? J. Accounting Econom. 47:59–86.Crossref, Google Scholar

