Communicating with Warmth in Distributive Negotiations Is Surprisingly Counterproductive

References

• Abele AE, Wojciszke B (2007) Agency and communion from the perspective of self vs. others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(5):751–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 2:267–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allred KG, Mallozzi JS, Matsui F, Raia CP (1997) The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 70(3):175–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amanatullah ET, Morris MW (2010) Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(2):256–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ames DR, Mason MF (2015) Tandem anchoring: Informational and politeness effects of range offers in social exchange. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(2):254–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Berdahl JL (2002) The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(6):1362–1377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson LM, Pearson CM (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):452–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aries EJ, Gold C, Weigel RH (1983) Dispositional and situational influences on dominance behavior in small groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 44(4):779–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2009) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bacharach SB, Lawler EJ (1981) Bargaining: Power, Tactics and Outcomes (Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Barasch A, Levine EE, Berman JZ, Small DA (2014) Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(3):393–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry B, Friedman RA (1998) Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(2):345–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Statist. Software 67(1):1–48.Google Scholar
• Bates E (1976) Language and Context: The Acquisition of Pragmatics (Academic Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Baxter LA (1985) Accomplishing relationship disengagement. Duck S, Perlman D, eds. Understanding Personal Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Approach (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 243–265.Google Scholar
• Belkin LY, Kurtzberg TR, Naquin CE (2013) Signaling dominance in online negotiations: The role of affective tone. Negotiation Conflict Management Res. 6(4):285–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benoit K, Nulty PP (2016) Quanteda: Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data. R Package Version 0.9, 6–9.Google Scholar
• Ben-Yoav O, Pruitt DG (1984) Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 20(4):323–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blum-Kulka S, Danet B, Gherson R (1985) The language of requesting in Israeli society. Forgas JP, ed. Language and Social Situations (Springer, New York), 113–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles HR, Babcock L (2013) How can women escape the compensation negotiation dilemma? Relational accounts are one answer. Psych. Women Quart. 37(1):80–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown P, Levinson SC (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, vol 4 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Dunbar NE (2000) Interpersonal dominance as a situationally, interactionally, and relationally contingent social skill. Commun. Monographs 67(1):96–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Newton DA (1991) Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectives. Southern J. Commun. 56(2):96–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calhoun B, producer (2014) Good guys [radio broadcast episode]. This American Life. Accessed December 12, 2018, https://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/515/good-guys.Google Scholar
• Cansler DC, Stiles WB (1981) Relative status and interpersonal presumptuousness. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 17(5):459–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell PL, Konneker BH (1981) Politeness: Comparing native and nonnative judgments. Language Learn. 31(1):17–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini R (1993) Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (William Morrow and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Clark HH, Schunk DH (1980) Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition 8(2):111–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil C, Sudhof M, Jurafsky D, Leskovec J, Potts C (2013) A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. Proc. 51st Annual Meeting Assoc. Computational Linguistics, vol. 1 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 250–259.Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Boles TL (1998) Share and share alike or winner take all? The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(3):253–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Giebels E, Van de Vliert E (1998) Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):408–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CW, Weingart LR, Kwon S (2000) Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(5):889–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar NE, Burgoon JK (2005) Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 22(2):207–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar NE, Ramirez A Jr, Burgoon JK (2003) The effects of participation on the ability to judge deceit. Commun. Rep. 16(1):23–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Rabin M (1996) Cheap talk. J. Econom. Perspect. 10(3):103–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher R, Ury WL, Patton B (2011) Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
• Fiske ST (1993) Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. Amer. Psychologist 48(6):621–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJ, Glick P (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(2):77–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fraser B, Nolen W (1981) The association of deference with linguistic form. Internat. J. Sociol. Language 1981(27):93–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Statist. Software 33(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Mussweiler T (2001) First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(4):657–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC (2003) From power to action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(3):453–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Leonardelli GJ, Okhuysen GA, Mussweiler T (2005) Regulatory focus at the bargaining table: Promoting distributive and integrative success. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 31(8):1087–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallupe RB, Bastianutti LM, Cooper WH (1991) Unblocking brainstorms. J. Appl. Psych. 76(1):137–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouldner A (1960) The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 25(2):161–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimmer J, Stewart BM (2013) Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Anal. 21(3):298–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill B, Ide S, Ikuta S, Kawasaki A, Ogino T (1986) Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. J. Pragmatics 10(3):347–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes J, Schnurr S (2005) Politeness, humor and gender in the workplace: Negotiating norms and identifying contestation. J. Politeness Res. Language Behav. Culture 1(1):121–149.Google Scholar
• Holoien DS, Fiske ST (2013) Downplaying positive impressions: Compensation between warmth and competence in impression management. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(1):33–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtgraves T, Srull TK, Socall D (1989) Conversation memory: The effects of speaker status on memory for the assertiveness of conversation remarks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 56(2):149–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (Harcourt, Brace & World, New York).Google Scholar
• Honnibal M, Johnson M (2015). An improved non-monotonic transition system for dependency parsing. Proc. 2015 Conf. Empirical Methods Natl. Language Processing (ACL SIGDAT, Lisbon, Portugal), 1373–1378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd CM, James-Hawkins L, Yzerbyt V, Kashima Y (2005) Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):899–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jurafsky D, Martin J (2009) Speech and Natural Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kelley HH, Thibaut JW (1978) Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Haidt J (1999) Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition Emotion 13(5):505–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. 110(2):265–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kervyn N, Yzerbyt VY, Judd CM, Nunes A (2009) A question of compensation: The social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(4):828–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kipnis D, Schmidt SM, Wilkinson I (1980) Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. J. Appl. Psych. 65(4):440–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komter A (1989) Hidden power in marriage. Gender Soc. 3(2):187–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopelman S, Rosette AS, Thompson L (2006) The three faces of Eve: Strategic displays of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 99(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Thompson L (2004) Gender stereotypes and negotiation performance: An examination of theory and research. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:103–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakoff R (1973) The logic of politeness: or, minding your p's and q's. Corum C, Smith-Stark TC, Weiser A, eds. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 13-15, 1973 (Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago), 292–305.Google Scholar
• Lax DA, Sebenius JK (1986) The Managerial Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Lee AJ, Ames DR (2017) “I can’t pay more” vs. “it’s not worth more”: Divergent effects of constraint and disparagement rationales in negotiations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 141:16–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovelace K, Shapiro DL, Weingart LR (2001) Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(4):779–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maaravi Y, Ganzach Y, Pazy A (2011) Negotiation as a form of persuasion: Arguments in first offers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(2):245–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magee JC, Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH (2007) Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(2):200–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra D, Bazerman MH (2008) Negotiation Genius: How to Overcome Obstacles and Achieve Brilliant Results at the Bargaining Table and Beyond (Bantam, New York).Google Scholar
• Marks M, Harold C (2011) Who asks and who receives in salary negotiation. J. Organ. Behav. 32(3):371–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mason MF, Lee AJ, Wiley EA, Ames DR (2013) Precise offers are potent anchors: Conciliatory counteroffers and attributions of knowledge in negotiations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(4):759–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H, Jorgensen J, Dougherty D, Westley F (1996) Some surprising things about collaboration—Knowing how people connect makes it work better. Organ. Dynamics 25(1):60–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morand DA (1996) Dominance, deference, and egalitarianism in organizational interaction: A sociolinguistic analysis of power and politeness. Organ. Sci. 7(5):544–556.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Hara C (2015) How to negotiate nicely without being a pushover. Harvard Bus. Rev. Accessed December 12, 2018, https://hbr.org/2015/04/how-to-negotiate-nicely-without-being-a-pushover.Google Scholar
• Paulson GD (2014) Sugar bowl. Accessed December 12, 2018, http://www.negotiationexercises.com/Details.aspx?ItemID=82.Google Scholar
• Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK (1996) Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 68(3):208–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pruitt DG (1983) Strategic choice in negotiation. Amer. Behavioral Scientist 27(2):167–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pruitt DG, Lewis SA (1975) Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 31(4):621–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers PS, Lee-Wong SM (2003) Reconceptualizing politeness to accommodate dynamic tensions in subordinate-to-superior reporting. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 17(4):379–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin JZ, Brockner J, Eckenrode J, Enright MA, Johnson-George C (1980) Weakness as strength: Test of a “my hands are tied” ploy in bargaining. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 6(2):216–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro RM (2001) The Power of Nice: How to Negotiate so Everyone Wins-Especially You! (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Sinaceur M, Tiedens LZ (2006) Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(3):314–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone M (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series B (Methodological) 36(2):111–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson L (2009) The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator, 4th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series B (Methodological) 58(1):267–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens LZ, Unzueta MM, Young MJ (2007) An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(3):402–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tinsley CH, O’Connor KM, Sullivan BA (2002) Tough guys finish last: The perils of a distributive reputation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 88(2):621–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trötschel R, Loschelder DD, Höhne BP, Majer JM (2015) Procedural frames in negotiations: How offering my resources vs. requesting yours impacts perception, behavior, and outcomes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(3):417–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, Côté S (2007) Expressing anger in conflict: When it helps and when it hurts. J. Appl. Psych. 92(6):1557–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CK, Manstead AS (2004) The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(1):57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varma S, Simon R (2006) Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection. BMC Bioinformatics 7(1):91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Voigt R, Camp NP, Prabhakaran V, Hamilton WL, Hetey RC, Griffiths CM, Jurgens D, Jurafsky D, Eberhardt JL (2017) Language from police body camera footage shows racial disparities in officer respect. Proc. National Acad. Sci. 114(25):6521–6526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walters J (1980) Grammar, meaning, and sociocultural appropriateness in second language acquisition. Canadian J. Psych. 34(4):337–345.Google Scholar
• Watts R (2003) Politeness (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weingart LR, Bennett RJ, Brett JM (1993) The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. J. Appl. Psych. 78(3):504–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler M (2002) Negotiation Analysis: An Introduction (Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston).Google Scholar
• Wojciszke B (2005) Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 16(1):155–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeomans M, Kantor A, Tingley D (2018) Politeness: An R Package, Version 0.1.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=politeness.Google Scholar
• Yzerbyt VY, Kervyn N, Judd CM (2008) Compensation vs. halo: The unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(8):1110–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander A, Forward J (1968) Position in group, achievement motivation, and group aspirations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 8(3):282–288.Crossref, Google Scholar