Managing Negative Celebrity Endorser Publicity: How Announcements of Firm (Non)Responses Affect Stock Returns

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3243

References

  • Agrawal J, Kamakura WA (1995) The economic worth of celebrity endorsers: An event study analysis. J. Marketing 59(3):56–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Archer RL, Burleson JA (1980) The effects of timing of self-disclosure on attraction and reciprocity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(1):120–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartz S, Molchanov A, Stork PA (2013) When a celebrity endorser is disgraced: A twenty-five-year event study. Marketing Lett. 24(2):131–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beber A, Pagano M (2013) Short-selling bans around the world: Evidence from the 2007–09 crisis. J. Finance 68(1):343–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boehmer E, Jones CM, Zhang X (2013) Shackling short sellers: The 2008 shorting ban. Rev. Financial Stud. 26(6):1363–1400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boehmer E, Musumeci J, Poulsen A (1991) Event study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance. J. Financial Econom. 30(2):253–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen KA, Jackman R (1990) Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. Modern Methods Data Anal. 13(4):257–291.Google Scholar
  • Borah A, Tellis GJ (2014) Make, buy, or ally? Choice of and payoff from announcements of alternate strategies for innovations. Marketing Sci. 33(1):114–133.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bottom WP, Gibson K, Daniels SE, Murnighan JK (2002) When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation. Organ. Sci. 13(5):497–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Breitung J, Swanson NR (2002) Temporal aggregation and spurious instantaneous causality in multiple time series models. J. Time Ser. Anal. 23(6):651–665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bundy J, Pfarrer MD (2015) A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):345–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carhart MM (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1):57–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carrillat FA, d’Astous A, Christianis H (2014) Guilty by association: The perils of celebrity endorsement for endorsed brands and their direct competitors. Psych. Marketing 31(11):1024–1039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carrillat FA, d’Astous A, Lazure J (2013) For better, for worse? What to do when celebrity endorsements go bad. J. Advertising Res. 53:15–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Ganesan S, Liu Y (2009) Does a firm’s product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product-harm crises. J. Marketing 73(6):214–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung K, Derdenger T, Srinivasan K (2013) Economic value of celebrity endorsements: Tiger Woods’ impact on sales of Nike golf balls. Marketing Sci. 32(2):271–293.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cleeren K, Van Heerde HJ, Dekimpe MG (2013) Rising from the ashes: How brands and categories can overcome product-harm crises. J. Marketing 77(2):58–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cochran WG, Rubin DB (1973) Controlling bias in observational studies: A review. Sankhya Ser. A. 35(4):417–446.Google Scholar
  • Cook RD (1977) Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics 19(1):15–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coombs WT (1995) Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis response strategies. Management Comm. Quart. 8(4):447–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coombs WT (1998) An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation. J. Public Relations Res. 10(3):177–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coombs WT (2007) Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Rev. 10(3):163–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coombs WT, Holladay SJ (2004) Reasoned action in crisis communication: An attribution theory-based approach to crisis management. Millar DP, Heath RL, eds. Responding to Crisis: A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 95–115.Google Scholar
  • Dawar N, Pillutla MM (2000) Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. J. Marketing Res. 37(2):215–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Bondt WF, Thaler RH (1985) Does the stock market overreact? J. Finance 40(3):793–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Bondt WF, Thaler RH (1987) Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality. J. Finance 42(3):557–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ding H, Molchanov AE, Storck PA (2011) The value of celebrity endorsements: A stock market perspective. Marketing Lett. 22(2):147–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Jackson SE (1987) Categorizing strategic issues: Links to organizational action. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):76–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eagly AH, Wood W, Chaiken S (1978) Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(4):424–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eilert M, Jayachandran S, Kalaignanam K, Swartz T (2017) Does it pay to recall your product early? An empirical investigation in the automobile industry. J. Marketing 81(3):111–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elberse A (2007) The power of stars: Do star actors drive the success of movies? J. Marketing 71(4):102–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elberse A, Verleun J (2012) The economic value of celebrity endorsements. J. Advertising Res. 52(2):149–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang L, Peress J (2009) Media coverage and the cross‐section of stock returns. J. Finance 64(5):2023–2052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST (1980) Attention and weight in person perception: the impact of negative and extreme behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(6):889–906.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forbes (2017a) Michael Jordan leads the NBA’s biggest shoe deals at $110 million this year. Forbes (June 9), https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2017/06/09/the-nbas-biggest-shoe-deals/#19530b231520.Google Scholar
  • Forbes (2017b) The world’s highest-paid athletes 2017: Behind the numbers. Forbes (June 7), https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2017/06/07/the-worlds-highest-paid-athletes-2017-behind-the-numbers/#2748141c66ad.Google Scholar
  • Gao H, Xie J, Wang Q, Wilbur KC (2015) Should ad spending increase or decrease before a recall announcement? The marketing-finance interface in product-harm crisis management. J. Marketing 79(5):80–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldsmith RE, Lafferty BA, Newell SJ (2000) The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. J. Advertising 29(3):43–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grunig LA, Grunig JE, and WP Ehling (1992) What is an effective organization. Grunig JE, ed. Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ), 65–90.Google Scholar
  • Guardian, The (2013) George Clooney tastes sustainability in Nespresso coffee. The Guardian (July 17), https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2013/jul/17/george-clooney-nespresso-coffee-ad.Google Scholar
  • Hirano K, Imbens G (2004) The propensity score with continuous treatment. Gelman A, Meng XL, eds. Applied Bayesian Modelling and Causal Inference from Missing Data Perspectives (Wiley, New York), 73–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hood M (2012) The Tiger Woods scandal: A cautionary tale for event studies. Managerial Finance 38(5):543–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu HC, Reed AV, Rocholl J (2010) The new game in town: Competitive effects of IPOs. J. Finance 65(2):495–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joshi AM, Hanssens DM (2009) Movie advertising and the stock market valuation of studios: A case of great expectations? Marketing Sci. 28(2):239–250.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1982) Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 414–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamins MA (1990) An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. J. Advertising 19(1):4–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamins MA, Gupta K (1994) Congruence between spokesperson and product type: A matchup hypothesis perspective. Psych. Marketing 11(6):569–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller KL (2003) Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge. J. Consumer Res. 29(4):595–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knittel CR, Stango V (2014) Celebrity endorsements, firm value and reputation risk: Evidence from the Tiger Woods scandal. Management Sci. 16(1):21–37.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lafferty BA, Goldsmith RE (1999) Corporate credibility’s role in consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. J. Bus. Res. 44(2):109–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lafferty BA, Goldsmith RE, Newell SJ (2002) The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. J. Marketing Theory Practice 10(3):1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leeds MA (2010) Is bad news always bad? The impact of Floyd Landis’s rise and fall on Phonak. Appl. Econom. Lett. 17(8):805–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemons J, Shrader-Frechette K, Cranor C (1997) The precautionary principle: Scientific uncertainty and type i and type ii errors. Foundations Sci. 2:207–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Shankar V, Yun W (2017) Crisis management strategies and the long-term effects of product recalls on firm value. J. Marketing 81(5):30–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Louie TA, Obermiller C (2002) Consumer response to a firm’s endorser (dis)association decisions. J. Advertising 31(4):41–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Louie TA, Kulik RL, Jacobson R (2001) When bad things happen to the endorsers of good products. Marketing Lett. 12(1):13–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Managing IP (2016) How to protect your brand when your endorser goes rogue. Managing IP (April 25), http://www.managingip.com/Article/3544598/How-to-protect-your-brand-when-your-endorser-goes-rogue.html.Google Scholar
  • Marcus A, Goodman R (1991) Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Acad. Management J. 34(2):281–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcellino M (1999) Some consequences of temporal aggregation in empirical analysis. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 17(1):129–136.Google Scholar
  • McGinnies E, Ward CD (1980) Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 6(3):467–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Misra S, Beatty SE (1990) Celebrity spokesperson and brand congruence: An assessment of recall and affect. J. Bus. Res. 21(2):159–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neumayer E, Plümper T (2017) Robustness Tests for Quantitative Research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohanian R (1990) Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. J. Advertising 19(3):39–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oxley JE, Sampson RC, Silverman BS (2009) Arms race or détente? How interfirm alliance announcements change the stock market valuation of rivals. Management Sci. 55(8):1321–1337.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Patell JM (1976) Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical tests. J. Accounting Res. 14(2):246–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearson C, Clair J (1998) Reframing crisis management. Acad. Management Rev. 23(1):59–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1985) The constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Amer. Statist. 39(1):33–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin DB (2007) The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials. Statist. Medicine 26(1):20–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sala-i-Martin XX (1997) I just ran two million regressions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(2):178–183.Google Scholar
  • Sorescu A, Warren NL, Ertekin LJ (2017) Event study methodology in the marketing literature: An overview. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 45(2):186–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart EA (2010) Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statist. Sci. 25(1):1–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tellis GJ, Johnson J (2007) The value of quality. Marketing Sci. 26(6):758–773.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas VL, Fowler K (2016) Examining the impact of brand transgressions on consumers’ perceptions of celebrity endorsers. J. Advertising 45(4):377–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Till BD, Busler M (2000) The match-up hypothesis: Physical Attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. J. Advertising 29(3):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Till BD, Shimp TA (1998) Endorsers in advertising: The case of negative celebrity information. J. Advertising 27(1):67–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tybout AM, Calder BJ, Sternthal B (1981) Using information-processing theory to design marketing strategies. J. Marketing Res. 18(1):73–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner B (1986) An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White DW, Goddard L, Wilbur N (2009) The effects of negative information transference in the celebrity endorsement relationship. Internat. J. Retail Distribution Management 37(4):322–335.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiles MA, Jain SP, Mishra S, Lindsey C (2010) Stock market response to regulatory reports of deceptive advertising: The moderating effect of omission bias and firm reputation. Marketing Sci. 29(5):828–845.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Wowak AJ, Mannor MJ, Wowak KD (2015) Throwing caution to the wind: The effect of CEO stock option pay on the incidence of product safety problems. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1082–1092.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.