Dynamic Attention Behavior Under Return Predictability

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3328

References

  • Abel A, Eberly J, Panageas S (2007) Optimal inattention to the stock market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):244–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abel AB, Eberly JC, Panageas S (2013) Optimal inattention to the stock market with information costs and transactions costs. Econometrica 81(4):1455–1481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ait-Sahalia Y, Brandt MW (2001) Variable selection for portfolio choice. J. Finance 56(4):1297–1351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrei D, Hasler M (2014) Investor attention and stock market volatility. Rev. Financ. Stud. 28(1):33–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andries M, Haddad V (2019) Information aversion. J. Political Econom. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Barber BM, Odean T (2008) All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(2):785–818.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barberis N (2000) Investing for the long run when returns are predictable. J. Finance. 55(1):225–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benveniste LM, Scheinkman JA (1979) On the differentiability of the value function in dynamic models of economics. Econometrica 47(3):727–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J. Econometrics 31(3):307–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandt MW (1999) Estimating portfolio and consumption choice: A conditional Euler equations approach. J. Finance 54(5):1609–1645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandt MW, Goyal A, Santa-Clara P, Stroud JR (2005) A simulation approach to dynamic portfolio choice with an application to learning about return predictability. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(3):831–873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brennan MJ (1998) The role of learning in dynamic portfolio decisions. Eur. Finance Rev. 1(3):295–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brennan MJ, Xia Y (2001) Stock price volatility and equity premium. J. Monetary Econom. 47(2):249–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brunnermeier MK, Parker JA (2005) Optimal expectations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95:1092–1118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell JY, Viceira LM (1999) Consumption and portfolio decisions when expected returns are time varying. Quart. J. Econom. 114(2):433–495.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplin A, Leahy J (2001) Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):55–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplin A, Leahy J (2004) The supply of information by a concerned expert. Econom. J. 114(497):487–505.Google Scholar
  • Chacko G, Viceira LM (2005) Dynamic consumption and portfolio choice with stochastic volatility in incomplete markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(4):1369–1402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chien Y, Cole H, Lustig H (2012) Is the volatility of the market price of risk due to intermittent portfolio rebalancing? Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2859–2896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chordia T, Swaminathan B (2000) Trading volume and cross-autocorrelations in stock returns. J. Finance 55(2):913–935.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2011) In search of attention. J. Finance 66(5):1461–1499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das SR, Uppal R (2004) Systemic risk and international portfolio choice. J. Finance 59(6):2809–2834.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David A (1997) Fluctuating confidence in stock markets: Implications for returns and volatility. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 32(4):427–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detemple J (1986) Asset pricing in a production economy with incomplete information. J. Finance 41(2):383–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detemple J, Kihlstrom R (1987) Acquisition d’information dans un modèle intertemporel en temps continu. Actualité Econom. 63(2):118–137.Google Scholar
  • Dothan MU, Feldman D (1986) Equilibrium interest rates and multiperiod bonds in a partially observable economy. J. Finance 41(2):369–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman D (1989) The term structure of interest rates in a partially observable economy. J. Finance 44(3):789–812.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher AJ, Martineau C, Sheng J (2016) Macroeconomic attention and the stock market. Working paper, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  • Galai D, Sade O (2006) The “ostrich effect” and the relationship between the liquidity and the yields of financial assets. J. Bus. 79(5):2741–2759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gargano A, Rossi AG (2018) Does it pay to pay attention? Rev. Financial Stud. 31(12):4595–4649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gennotte G (1986) Optimal portfolio choice under incomplete information. J. Finance 41(3):733–746.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gervais S, Kaniel R, Mingelgrin DH (2001) The high-volume return premium. J. Finance 56(3):877–919.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goyal A, Welch I (2008) A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(4):1455–1508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton JD (1994) Time Series Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hasler M, Ornthanalai C (2018) Fluctuating attention and financial contagion. J. Monetary Econom. 99:106–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heston S (1993) A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Rev. Financial Stud. 6(2):327–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hou K, Peng L, Xiong W (2009) A tale of two anomalies: The implications of investor attention for price and earnings momentum. Working paper, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  • Huang L, Liu H (2007) Rational inattention and portfolio selection. J. Finance 62(4):1999–2040.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judd KL (1998) Numerical Methods in Economics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Jurado K, Ludvigson SC, Ng S (2015) Measuring uncertainty. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(3):1177–1216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk M, Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L (2016) A rational theory of mutual funds’ attention allocation. Econometrica 84(2):571–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kandel S, Stambaugh RF (1996) On the predictability of stock returns: An asset-allocation perspective. J. Finance 51(2):385–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karlsson N, Loewenstein G, Seppi D (2009) The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(2):95–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim TS, Omberg E (1996) Dynamic nonmyopic portfolio behavior. Rev. Financial Stud. 9(1):141–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liptser RS, Shiryaev AN (2001) Statistics of Random Processes II (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Liu J (2007) Portfolio selection in stochastic environments. Rev. Financial Stud. 20(1):1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu J, Peleg E, Subrahmanyam A (2010) Information, expected utility, and portfolio choice. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 45(5):1221–1251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lo A, Wang J (2000) Trading volume: Definitions, data analysis, and implications of portfolio theory. Rev. Financial Stud. 13(2):257–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G (1987) Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Econom. J. 97(387):666–684.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RC (1971) Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. J. Econom. Theory. 3(4):373–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RC (1980) On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation. J. Financial Econom. 8(4):323–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RC (1998) Continuous-Time Finance (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Mondria J (2010) Portfolio choice, attention allocation, and price comovement. J. Econom. Theory 145(5):1837–1864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mondria J, Quintana-Domeque C (2013) Financial contagion and attention allocation. Econom. J. 123(568):429–454.Google Scholar
  • Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55(3):703–708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pagel M (2018) A news-utility theory for inattention and delegation in portfolio choice. Econometrica 86(2):491–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng L, Xiong W (2006) Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. J. Financial Econom. 80(3):563–602.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sicherman N, Loewenstein G, Seppi DJ, Utkus SP (2015) Financial attention. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(4):863–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sims CA (2003) Implications of rational inattention. J. Monetary Econom. 50(3):665–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tetlock PC (2007) Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. J. Finance. 62(3):1139–1168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L (2006) Learning asymmetries in real business cycles. J. Monetary Econom. 53(4):753–772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L (2010) Information acquisition and under-diversification. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):779–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veldkamp L (2006a) Media frenzies in markets for financial information. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):577–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veldkamp LL (2006b) Information markets and the comovement of asset prices. Rev. Econom. Stud. 73(3):823–845.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veronesi P (1999) Stock market overreaction to bad news in good times: A rational expectations equilibrium model. Rev. Financial Stud. 12(5):975–1007.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veronesi P (2000) How does information quality affect stock returns? J. Finance 55(2):807–837.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wachter JA (2002) Portfolio and consumption decisions under mean-reverting returns: An exact solution for complete markets. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 37(1):63–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xia Y (2001) Learning about predictability: The effects of parameter uncertainty on dynamic asset allocation. J. Finance 56(1):205–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ziegler AC (2003) Incomplete Information and Heterogeneous Beliefs in Continuous-Time Finance (Springer, Berlin).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.