Analysts’ Beauty and Performance

References

• Andreoni J, Petrie R (2008) Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. J. Econom. Psych. 29(1):73–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Lehavy R, McNichols M, Trueman B (2006) Buys, holds, and sells: The distribution of investment banks’ stock ratings and the implications for the profitability of analysts’ recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. 41(1):87–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berggren N, Jordahl H, Poutvaara P (2010) The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success. J. Public Econom. 94(1-2):8–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berri DJ, Simmons R, Gilder JV, O’Neill L (2011) What does it mean to find the face of the franchise? Physical attractiveness and the evaluation of athletic performance. Econom. Lett. 111(3):200–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Karlan D, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zinman J (2010) What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 125(1):263–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biddle JE, Hamermesh DS (1998) Beauty, productivity, and discrimination: Lawyers’ looks and lucre. J. Labor Econom. 16(1):172–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradshaw M, Ertimur Y, O’Brien P (2016) Financial analysts and their contribution to well-functioning capital markets. Foundations Trends Accounting 11(3):119–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brochet F, Miller GS, Srinivasan S (2013) Do analysts follow managers who switch companies? An analysis of relationships in the capital markets. Accounting Rev. 89(2):451–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown LD, Call AC, Clement MB, Sharp NY (2015) Inside the ‘black box’ of sell-side financial analysts. J. Accounting Res. 53(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cash TF, Gillen B, Burns DS (1977) Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making. J. Appl. Psych. 62(3):301–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Chen X, Schipper K, Xu Y, Xue J (2012) The sensitivity of corporate cash holdings to corporate governance. Rev. Financial Stud. 25(12):3610–3644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Q, Du F, Wang X, Wang Y (2016) Seeing is believing: Analysts’ corporate site visits. Rev. Accounting Stud. 21(4):1245–1286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Q, Du F, Wang X, Wang Y (2019) Do corporate site visits impact stock prices? Contemporary Accounting Res. 36(1):359–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clement MB (1999) Analyst forecast accuracy: Do ability, resources, and portfolio complexity matter? J. Accounting Econom. 27(3):285–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C (2010) Sell side school ties. J. Finance 65(4):1409–1437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper RA, Day TE, Lewis CM (2001) Following the leader: A study of individual analysts’ earnings forecasts. J. Financial Econom. 61(3):383–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corwin SA, Schultz P (2012) A simple way to estimate bid-ask spreads from daily high and low prices. J. Finance 67(2):719–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E (1972) What is beautiful is good. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 24(3):285–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dipboye RL, Arvey RD, Terpstra DE (1977) Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations. J. Appl. Psych. 62(3):288–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dipboye RL, Fromkin HL, Wiback K (1975) Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. J. Appl. Psych. 60(1):39–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Ashmore RD, Makhijani MG, Longo LC (1991) What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psych. Bull. 110(1):109–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feingold A (1992) Good-looking people are not what we think. Psych. Bull. 111(2):304–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fletcher JM (2009) Beauty vs. brains: Early labor market outcomes of high school graduates. Econom. Lett. 105(3):321–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham JR, Harvey CR, Puri M (2017) A corporate beauty contest. Management Sci. 63(9):3044–3056.Link, Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Li Z, Yang Y (2013) Monitors or predators: The influence of institutional investors on sell–side analysts. Accounting Rev. 88(1):137–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Li Z, Yang Y, Li G (2019) Friends in need are friends indeed: An analysis of social ties between financial analysts and mutual fund managers. Accounting Rev. 94(1):153–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamermesh DS (2006) Changing looks and changing “discrimination”: The beauty of economists. Econom. Lett. 93(3):405–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamermesh DS, Biddle JE (1994) Beauty and the labor market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(5):1174–1194.Google Scholar
• Hao X, Liang Q (2009) Does stock pledge of ultimate owner impairs firm value? Accounting Res. 7:57–64.Google Scholar
• Harper B (2000) Beauty, stature and the labour market: A British cohort study. Oxford. Bull. Econom. Statist. 62(s1):771–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He X, Yin H, Zeng Y, Zhang H, Zhao H (2019) Facial structure and achievement drive: Evidence from financial analysts. J. Accounting Res. 57(4):1013–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Kubik JD (2003) Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biases earnings forecasts. J. Finance 58(1):313–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosoda M, Stone-Romero EF, Coats G (2003) The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personality Psych. 56(2):431–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson LA, Hunter JE, Hodge CN (1995) Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Soc. Psych. Quart. 58(2):108–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnston DW (2010) Physical appearance and wages: Do blondes have more fun? Econom. Lett. 108(1):10–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A (2010) Self-selection and the forecasting abilities of female equity analysts. J. Accounting Res. 48(2):393–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landry CE, Lange A, List JA, Price MK, Rupp NG (2006) Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: Evidence from a field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):747–782.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landy D, Sigall H (1974) Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer’s physical attractiveness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 29(3):299–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois JH, Roggman LA (1990) Attractive faces are only average. Psych. Sci. 1(2):115–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois JH, Roggman LA, Musselman L (1994) What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psych. Sci. 5(4):214–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois JH, Roggman LA, Rieser-Danner LA (1990) Infants’ differential social responses to attractive and unattractive faces. Developmental Psych. 26(1):153–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M (2000) Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psych. Bull. 126(3):390–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao L, Liu B, Wang H (2014) China’s secondary privatization: Perspectives from the split-share structure reform. J. Financial Econom. 113(3):500–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin HW, McNichols MF (1998) Underwriting relationships, analysts’ earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. J. Accounting Econom. 25(1):101–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ljungqvist A, Marston F, Starks LT, Wei KD, Yan H (2007) Conflicts of interest in sell-side research and the moderating role of institutional investors. J. Financial Econom. 85(2):420–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• López Bóo F, Rossi MA, Urzúa SS (2013) The labor market return to an attractive face: Evidence from a field experiment. Econom. Lett. 118(1):170–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merkley KJ, Michaely R, Pacelli J (2018) Cultural diversity on Wall Street: Evidence from sell-side analysts’ forecasts. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
• Miller AG (1970) Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Sci. 19(4):241–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills J, Aronson E (1965) Opinion change as a function of the communicator’s attractiveness and desire to influence. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 1(2):173–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobius MM, Rosenblat TS (2006) Why beauty matters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):222–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrow PC, McElroy JC, Stamper BG, Wilson MA (1990) The effects of physical attractiveness and other demographic characteristics on promotion decisions. J. Management 16(4):723–736.Google Scholar
• Mueller U, Mazur A (1996) Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Soc. Forces 74(3):823–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mulford M, Orbell J, Shatto C, Stockard J (1998) Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(6):1565–1592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parrett M (2015) Beauty and the feast: Examining the effect of beauty on earnings using restaurant tipping data. J. Econom. Psych. 49:34–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfann GA, Biddle JE, Hamermesh DS, Bosman CM (2000) Business success and businesses’ beauty capital. Econom. Lett. 67(2):201–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruffle BJ, Shtudiner Z (2015) Are good-looking people more employable? Management Sci. 61(8):1760–1776.Link, Google Scholar
• Rynes S, Gerhart B (1990) Interviewer assessments of applicant “fit”: An exploratory investigation. Personality Psych. 43(1):13–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuels CA, Ewy R (1985) Aesthetic perception of faces during infancy. British J. Developmental Psych. 3(3):221–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solnick SJ, Schweitzer ME (1999) the influence of physical attractiveness and gender on ultimatum game decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 79(3):199–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soltes E (2014) Private interaction between firm management and sell-side analysts. J. Accounting Res. 52(1):245–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart JE (1980) Defendant’s attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 10(4):348–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster M, Driskell JE (1983) Beauty as status. Amer. J. Sociol. 89(1):140–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson RK, Eckel CC (2006) Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Res. Quart. 59(2):189–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiao G (2015) Trading and earnings management: Evidence from China’s non-tradable share reform. J. Corporate Finance 31:67–90.Crossref, Google Scholar