The Future Ambiguity Effect: How Narrow Payoff Ranges Increase Future Payoff Appeal

References

• Abdellaoui M, Diecidue E, Önçüler A (2011) Risk preferences at different time periods: An experimental investigation. Management Sci. 57(5):975–987.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahlbrecht M, Weber M (1997) An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Sci. 43(6):813–826.Link, Google Scholar
• Ainslie G, Haslam N (1992) Hyperbolic discounting. Loewenstein GF, Elster J, eds. Choice Over Time (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 57–92.Google Scholar
• Anderson LR, Stafford SL (2009) Individual decision-making experiments with risk and intertemporal choice. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(1):51–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson NH (1965) Averaging vs. adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. J. Experiment. Psych. 70(4):394–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartels DM, Urminsky O (2015) To know and to care: How awareness and valuation of the future jointly shape consumer spending. J. Consumer Res. 41(6):1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M, Heukamp FH (2012) Probability and time trade-off. Management Sci. 58(4):831–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Bixter MT, Luhmann CC (2015) Evidence for implicit risk: Delay facilitates the processing of uncertainty. J. Behav. Decision Making 28(4):347–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackburn M, El-Deredy W (2013) The future is risky: Discounting of delayed and uncertain outcomes. Behav. Processes 94(March):9–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bommier A (2006) Uncertain lifetime and intertemporal choice: Risk aversion as a rationale for time discounting. Internat. Econom. Rev. 47(4):1223–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu DV, Wallsten TS (1995) Processing linguistic probabilities: General principles and empirical evidence. Busemeyer J, Medin DL, Hastie R, eds. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective (Academic Press, San Diego), 275–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):325–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curley SP, Yates JF (1985) The center and range of the probability interval as factors affecting ambiguity preferences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 36(2):273–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du N, Budescu DV (2005) The effects of imprecise probabilities and outcomes in evaluating investment options. Management Sci. 51(12):1791–1803.Link, Google Scholar
• Du N, Budescu DV, Shelley MK, Omer RC (2011) The appeal of vague financial forecasts. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(1):179–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75(4):643–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franco‐Watkins AM, Mattson RE, Jackson MD (2016) Now or later? Attentional processing and intertemporal choice. J. Behav. Decision Making 29(2–3):206–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’ Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J. Econom. Literature 40(2):350–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman N (2017) Hurricane Maria caused as much as $85 billion in insured losses, AIR Worldwide says. Wall Street Journal (September 25), https://www.wsj.com/articles/hurricane-maria-caused-as-much-as-85-billion-in-insured-losses-air-worldwide-says-1506371305Google Scholar
• Glazer R, Steckel JH, Winer RS (1992) Locally rational decision making: The distracting effect of information on managerial performance. Management Sci. 38(2):212–226.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, List JA, Wu G (2006) The uncertainty effect: When a risky prospect is valued less than its worst possible outcome. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1283–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldsmith K, Amir O (2010) Can uncertainty improve promotions? J. Marketing Res. 47(6):1070–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• González-Vallejo C, Bonazzi A, Shapiro AJ (1996) Effects of vague probabilities and of vague payoffs on preference: A model comparison analysis. J. Math. Psych. 40(2):130–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goswami I, Urminsky O (2016) When should the ask be a nudge? The effect of default amounts on charitable donations. J. Marketing Res. 53(5):829–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green L, Myerson J (2004) A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psych. Bull. 130(5):769–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green L, Myerson J, Ostaszewski P (1999) Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn. 25(2):418–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halevy Y (2008) Strotz meets Allais: Diminishing impatience and the certainty effect. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1145–1162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardisty DJ, Pfeffer J (2017) Intertemporal uncertainty avoidance: When the future is uncertain, people prefer the present, and when the present is uncertain, people prefer the future. Management Sci. 63(2):519–527.Link, Google Scholar
• Hardisty DJ, Appelt KC, Weber EU (2013) Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. J. Behav. Decision Making 26(4):348–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ho JLY, Keller LR, Keltyka P (2002) Effects of outcome and probabilistic ambiguity on managerial choices. J. Risk Uncertainty 24(1):47–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK (1996) The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(3):247–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G, Roelofsma P (1995) Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 63(3):287–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Zauberman G (2013) Can Victoria’s Secret change the future? A subjective time perception account of sexual-cue effects on impatience. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 142(2):328–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laran J, Tsiros M (2013) An investigation of the effectiveness of uncertainty in marketing promotions involving free gifts. J. Marketing 77(2):112–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee CJ, Andrade E (2015) Fear, excitement and financial risk-taking. Cognitive Emotion 29(1):178–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee YH, Qiu C (2009) When uncertainty brings pleasure: The role of prospect imageability and mental imagery. J. Consumer Res. 36(4):624–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Onculer A (2017) Ambiguity attitudes over time. J. Behav. Decision Making 30(1):80–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 65(3):272–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malkoc SA, Zauberman G (2006) Deferring vs. expediting consumption: The effect of outcome concreteness on sensitivity to time horizon. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):618–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malkoc SA, Zauberman G, Bettman JR (2010) Unstuck from the concrete: Carryover effects of abstract mindsets in intertemporal preferences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 113(2):112–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Grusec J (1967) Waiting for rewards and punishments: Effects of time and probability on choice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 5(1):24–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mischel W, Ayduk O, Mendoza-Denton R (2003) Sustaining delay of gratification over time: A hot-cool systems perspective. Loewenstein G, Read D, Baumeister R, eds. Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 175–200.Google Scholar
• Mullen MR (1995) Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 26(3):573–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noussair C, Wu C (2006) Risk tolerance in the present and the future: An experimental study. Management Decision Econom. 27(6):401–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onay S, La-ornual D, Onculer A (2013) The effect of temporal distance on attitudes toward imprecise probabilities and imprecise outcomes. J. Behav. Decision Making 26(4):362–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onculer A, Onay S (2009) How do we evaluate future gambles? Experimental evidence on path dependency in risky intertemporal choice. J. Behav. Decision Making 22(3):280–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patak M, Reynolds B (2007) Question-based assessments of delay discounting: Do respondents spontaneously incorporate uncertainty into their valuations for delayed rewards? Addictive Behav. 32(2):351–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 16(2):366–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Quart. J. Experiment. Psych. 32(1):3–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1991) Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Sci. 37(7):770–786.Link, Google Scholar
• Read D, Van Leeuwen B (1998) Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(2):189–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Olivola CY, Hardisty DJ (2017) The value of nothing: Asymmetric attention to opportunity costs drives intertemporal decision making. Management Sci. 63(12):4277–4297.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (2003) Economics and psychology? The case of hyperbolic discounting. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(4):1207–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shelley MK (1994) Gain/loss asymmetry in risky intertemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 59(1):124–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen L, Fishbach A, Hsee CK (2015) The motivating-uncertainty effect: Uncertainty increases resource investment in the process of reward pursuit. J. Consumer Res. 41(5):1301–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepperd JA, Waters EA, Weinstein ND, Klein WMP (2015) A primer on unrealistic optimism. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 24(3):232–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson MK (1992) The impact of temporal context and risk on the judged value of future outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 52(3):455–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Theeuwes J (1994) Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection. Perception 23(4):429–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urminsky O, Kivetz R (2011) Scope insensitivity and the “mere token” effect. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):282–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urminsky O, Zauberman G (2015) The psychology of intertemporal preferences. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK), 141–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber BJ, Chapman GB (2005) The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(2):104–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinstein ND (1980) Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):806–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zauberman G, Lynch JG (2005) Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time vs. money. J. Experiment. Psych. 134(1):23–37.Crossref, Google Scholar