Flexibility and Reputation in Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma Games

References

• Anderson E, Jap SD (2005) The dark side of close relationships. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 46(2):75–82.Google Scholar
• Aughinbaugh A, Robles O, Sun H (2013) Marriage and divorce: Patterns by gender, race, and educational attainment. Report, Monthly Labor Review, October 2013, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Bamford J, Ernst D, Fubini DG (2004) Launching a world-class joint venture. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(2):90–100.Google Scholar
• Bernard M, Fanning J, Yuksel S (2018) Finding cooperators: Sorting through repeated interaction. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 147(March):76–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ben Greiner AO (2013) Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Sci. 59(2):265–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E, Ockenfels A (2004) How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Sci. 50(11):1587–1602.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E, Ockenfels A (2005) Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation. J. Public Econom. 89(5):1457–1468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L, Hortaçsu A (2010) The dynamics of seller reputation: Theory and evidence from ebay. J. Indust. Econom. 58(1):54–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camera G, Casari M (2009) Cooperation among strangers under the shadow of the future. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):979–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coopers L (1986) Collaborative Ventures: An Emerging Phenomenon in Information Technology (Coopers and Lybrand, New York).Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P (2005) Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1591–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P, Fréchette GR (2011) The evolution of cooperation in infinitely repeated games: Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doolen T, Traxler M, McBride K (2006) Scorecards for supplier performance improvement: Case application in a lean manufacturing organization. Engrg. Management J. 18(2):26–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy J, Ochs J (2009) Cooperative behavior and the frequency of social interaction. Games Econom. Behav. 66(2):785–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy J, Xie H, Lee Y-J (2013) Social norms, information, and trust among strangers: Theory and evidence. Econom. Theory 52(2):669–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Jakiela P, Kariv S (2015) How did distributional preferences change during the great recession? J. Public Econom. 128:84–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D (2018) The determinants of online review informativeness: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Working paper, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Friedman JW (1971) A non-cooperative equilibrium for supergames. Rev. Econom. Stud. 38(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaudeul A, Crosetto P, Reiner G (2015) Of the stability of partnerships when individuals have outside options, or why allowing exit is inefficient. Jena Economic Research Papers #2015–001, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
• Grundberg S, Stoll JD 2012. Nokia sales face more hurdles. Wall Street Journal (June 2012), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304898704577480340752531300.Google Scholar
• Hauk E (2003) Multipl prisoner’s dilemma games with(out) an outside option: An experimental study. Theory Decision 54(3):207–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamei K (2017) Endogenous reputation formation under the shadow of the future. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 142(October):189–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamei K, Putterman L (2017) Play it again: Partner choice, reputation building and learning from finitely repeated dilemma games. Econom. J. (London). 127(602):1069–1095.Google Scholar
• Kandori M (1992) Social norms and community enforcement. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(1):63–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keser C, Montmarquette C (2011) Voluntary versus enforced team effort. Games 2(3):277–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• KPMG (2009) Joint Ventures: A Tool for Growth During an Economic Downturn (KPMG International, Amstelveen, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Lee N (2018) An experiment: Voluntary separation in indefinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma game. Working paper, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
• Lei V, Vesley F, Yang C-L (2018) Voluntary separation as a disciplinary device for long-term cooperation: Reconciling theory with evidence. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
• Liker JK, Choi TY (2004) Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Bus. Rev. December:104–113.Google Scholar
• Murnighan JK, Roth AE (1983) Expecting continued play in prisoner’s dilemma games: A test of several models. J. Conflict Resolution 27(2):279–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• My KB, Chalvignac B (2010) Voluntary participation and cooperation in a collective-good game. J. Econom. Psych. 31(4):705–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuville J (1997) La stratégie de la confiance: Le partenariat industrial observé depuis le fournisseur. Sociol. Trav. 20(3):297–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosenzo D, Tufano F (2017) The effect of voluntary participation on cooperation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 142(October):307–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) The limits of reputation in platform markets: An empirical analysis and field experiment. Working paper, Amazon, Seattle.Google Scholar
• Orbell JM, Dawes RM (1993) Social welfare, cooperators’ advantage and the option of not playing the game. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 58(6):787–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Murnighan JK (1978) Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoner’s dilemma. J. Math. Psych. 17(2):189–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shokoohyar S 2018. Supplier performance management: A behavioral study. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.Google Scholar
• Stahl DO (2013) An experimental test of the efficacy of simple reputation mechanisms to solve social dilemmas. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 94(October):116–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequence of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):675–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson AJ, Wu H (2017) At-will relationships: How an option to walk away affects cooperation and efficiency. Games Econom. Behav. 102:487–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang BY, Fan S-J, Li C, Zheng X-D, Bao J-Z, Cressman R, Tao Y (2016) Opting out against defection leads to stable coexistence with cooperation. Sci. Rep. 6:Article 35902.Google Scholar