When Transparency Fails: Bias and Financial Incentives in Ridesharing Platforms

References

• Aker JC, Ksoll C, Lybbert TJ (2012) Can mobile phones improve learning? Evidence from a field experiment in Niger. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 4(4):94–120.Google Scholar
• Axt JR (2018) The best way to measure explicit racial attitudes is to ask about them. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 9(8):896–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Badgett MVL, Lau H, Sears B, Ho D (2009) Bias in the workplace: Consistent evidence of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination. Chicago–Kent Law Rev. 84(2).Google Scholar
• Bandi C, Moreno A, Xu Z (2017) The hidden costs of dynamic pricing: Empirical evidence from online retailing in emerging markets. Working paper, Kellogg School of Management, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Donohue K, Schultz KL (2006) Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Management 24(6):737–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson PL, Karabenick SA, Lerner RM (1976) Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 12(5):409–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berg N, Lien D (2002) Measuring the effect of sexual orientation on income: Evidence of discrimination? Contemporary Econom. Policy 20(4):394–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 309–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blendon RJ, Casey LS, Benson JM, Sayde JM, Chan T, Miller C, Reese J, et al.. (2017) Discrimination in America: Experiences and views of African Americans. Report, National Public Radio, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health. https://www.npr.org/assets/img/2017/10/23/discriminationpoll-african-americans.pdf.Google Scholar
• Brown JR, Martinsson G (2018) Does transparency stifle or facilitate innovation? Management Sci. 65(4):1600–1623.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell R (2019) Last place aversion in queues. HBS Working Paper No. 14-034, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Buell R, Porter E, Norton M (2019) Surfacing the submerged state: Operational transparency increases trust in and engagement with government. HBS Working Paper No. 14-034, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Kim T, Tsay C-J (2016) Creating reciprocal value through operational transparency. Management Sci. 63(6):1673–1695.Link, Google Scholar
• Buell RW, Norton MI (2011) The labor illusion: How operational transparency increases perceived value. Management Sci. 57(9):1564–1579.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Google Scholar
• Chen C, Savva N (2018) Unintended consequences of hospital regulation: The case of the hospital readmissions reduction program. Preprint, submitted September 3, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3236983.Google Scholar
• Chinander KR, Schweitzer ME (2003) The input bias: The misuse of input information in judgments of outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(2):243–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhary V, Shunko M, Netessine S (2018) Does immediate feedback make you try less hard? A study of automotive telematics. Preprint, submitted October 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3260891.Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Hahn R, Hall J, Levitt S, Metcalfe R (2016) Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber. NBER Working Paper No. 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cryder C, Botti S, Simonyan Y (2017) The charity beauty premium: Satisfying donors’ “want” vs. “should” desires. J. Marketing Res. 54(4):605–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui R, Li J, Zhang DJ (2016) Discrimination with incomplete information in the sharing economy: Field evidence from Airbnb. Preprint, submitted December 8, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882982.Google Scholar
• Cunningham S, DeAngelo G, Tripp J (2017) Craiglist’s effect on violence against women. Accessed January 9, 2020, https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2018/preliminary/paper/QZNF9dHi.Google Scholar
• Davis JA, Smith TW (1991) The NORC General Social Survey: A User’s Guide, vol. 1 (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Dewey C (2015) More than 26 million people have changed their Facebook picture to a rainbow flag. Here’s why that matters. Washington Post (June 29), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2015/06/29/more-than-26-million-people-have-changed-their-facebook-picture-to-a-rainbow-flag-heres-why-that-matters/.Google Scholar
• Di Caro M (2017) How many people in Washington region drive for Uber or Lyft? It is still hard to say. WAMU.org (August 24), https://wamu.org/story/17/08/24/many-people-washington-region-drive-uber-lyft-still-hard-say/.Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Luca M, Svirsky D (2017) Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 9(2):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman BG, Luca M (2014) Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb.com. HBS Working Paper No. 14-054, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Freeman M, Savva N, Scholtes S (2017) Gatekeepers at work: An empirical analysis of a maternity unit. Management Sci. 63(10):3147–3167.Link, Google Scholar
• Friedrich J, Barnes P, Chapin K, Dawson I, Garst V, Kerr D (1999) Psychophysical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase. J. Consumer Psych. 8(3):277–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ge Y, Knittel CR, MacKenzie D, Zoepf S (2016) Racial and gender discrimination in transportation network companies. NBER Working Paper No. 22776, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gino F, Pisano G (2008) Toward a theory of behavioral operations. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(4):676–691.Google Scholar
• Gino F, Shu LL, Bazerman MH (2010) Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(2):93–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenberg D, Beyer E, Najle M, Bola O, Jones RP (2019) Americans show broad support for LGBT nondiscrimination protections. Technical report, Public Religion Research Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride-sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):163–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Adjerid I, Angst CM (2019) How unbecoming of you: Gender biases in perceptions of ridesharing performance. Proc. 52nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., Grand Wailea, Maui, Hawaii.Google Scholar
• Hansen HK, Flyverbom M (2015) The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization 22(6):872–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herek GM, McLemore KA (1998) Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Scale. Fisher T, Davis CM, Yarber WL, Davis SL, eds. Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures (Taylor & Francis, Oxford, UK), 392–394.Google Scholar
• Herek GM, McLemore KA (2011) The Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men (ATLG) Scale. Accessed January 16, 2020, https://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/atlg.html.Google Scholar
• Joseph WB (1982) The credibility of physically attractive communicators: A review. J. Advertising 11(3):15–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kono DY (2006) Optimal obfuscation: Democracy and trade policy transparency. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 100(3):369–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Wirtz D, Van Boven L, Altermatt TW (2004) The effort heuristic. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 40(1):91–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libich J (2006) Should monetary policy be transparent? Policy 22(1):28–34.Google Scholar
• Lurie NH, Swaminathan JM (2009) Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marlowe CM, Schneider SL, Nelson CE (1996) Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? J. Appl. Psych. 81(1):11–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mejia J, Mankad S, Gopal A (2017) More than just words: Latent semantic analysis, online reviews and restaurant closure. Acad. Management J. 2015(1):13912.Google Scholar
• Milkman KL, Akinola M, Chugh D (2012) Temporal distance and discrimination: An audit study in academia. Psych. Sci. 23(7):710–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minear M, Park DC (2004) A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behav. Res. Methods Instruments Comput. 36(4):630–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohan B, Buell R, John L (2018) Lifting the veil: The benefits of cost transparency. HBS Working Paper 15-017, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Mohr LA, Bitner MJ (1995) The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions. J. Bus. Res. 32(3):239–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morales AC (2005) Giving firms an “e” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. J. Consumer Res. 31(4):806–812.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moritz BB, Narayanan A, Parker C (2019) Unraveling behavioral ordering: Relative costs and the bullwhip effect: An experimental study. Preprint, submitted February 24, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3195282.Google Scholar
• Movement Advancement Project, Family Equality Council, and Center for American Progress (2011) All children matter: How legal and social inequalities hurt LGBT families. Report, Movement Advancement Project, Denver, CO. https://www.lgbtmap.org/file/all-children-matter-full-report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Moritz BB (2015) Decision making and cognition in multi-echelon supply chains: An experimental study. Production Oper. Management 24(8):1216–1234.Google Scholar
• NYC Administration for Children’s Services (2016) Respectfully asking sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) questions. Accessed January 9, 2020, https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/acs/pdf/lgbtq/Respectfully_Asking_SOGI_Questions.pdf.Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Hackman JR (1978) Work design in the organizational context. Technical report, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Ozeren E (2014) Sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 109(Suppl. C):1203–1215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker C, Ramdas K, Savva N (2016) Is IT enough? Evidence from a natural experiment in India’s agriculture markets. Management Sci. 62(9):2481–2503.Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2011a) Implementing anti-discrimination policies in statistical profiling models. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 3(3):206–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pope DG, Sydnor JR (2011b) What’s in a picture? Evidence of discrimination from Prosper.com. J. Human Resources 46(1):53–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rich S, Mellnik T, Kelly K, Lowery W (2018) Murder with impunity: Where murders go unsolved. Washington Post (June 6), https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/investigations/where-murders-go-unsolved/.Google Scholar
• Roberts J (2009) No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting Organ. Soc. 34(8):957–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Loewenstein G (2005) The devil you know: The effects of identifiability on punishment. J. Behav. Decision Making 18(5):311–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE (2002) Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):460–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz JE (2003) Information and the change in the paradigm in economics, Part 1. Amer. Econom. 47(2):6–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strathern M (2000) The tyranny of transparency. British Ed. Res. J. 26(3):309–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilcsik A (2011) Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(2):586–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2013) Housing discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities 2012. Report, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC. https://www.huduser.gov/portal//Publications/pdf/HUD-514_HDS2012.pdf.Google Scholar
• Weichselbaumer D (2003) Sexual orientation discrimination in hiring. Labour Econom. 10(6):629–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Younkin P, Kuppuswamy V (2017) The colorblind crowd? Founder race and performance in crowdfunding. Management Sci. 64(7):3269–3287.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu J (2019) Search, selectivity, and market thickness in two-sided markets. Preprint, submitted October 11, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3458373.Google Scholar
• Zhang DJ, Dai H, Dong L, Qi F, Zhang N, Liu X, Liu Z (2017) How does dynamic pricing affect customer behavior on retailing platforms? Evidence from a large randomized experiment on Alibaba. Working paper, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis.Google Scholar