What Drives Risk Perception? A Global Survey with Financial Professionals and Laypeople

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3526

References

  • Alevy JE, Haigh MS, List JA (2007) Information cascades: Evidence from a field experiment with financial market professionals. J. Finance 62(1):151–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bali TG, Cakici N, Whitelaw RF (2011) Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the crosssection of expected returns. J. Financial Econom. 99(2):427–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DE (1995) Risk, return, and utility. Management Sci. 41(1):23–30.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin DJ, Berger JO, Johannesson M, Nosek BA, Wagenmakers E-J, Berk R, Bollen KA, et al.. (2018) Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behav. 2:6–10.Google Scholar
  • Bontempo R, Bottom W, Weber EU (1997) Cross-cultural differences in risk perception: A model-based approach. Risk Anal. 17(4):479–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyer B, Mitton T, Vorkink K (2010) Expected idiosyncratic skewness. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(1):169–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brachinger HW, Weber M (1997) Risk as a primitive: A survey of measures of perceived risk. Oper. Res. Spektrum 19(4):235–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradbury MA, Hens T, Zeisberger S (2015) Improving investment decisions with simulated experience. Rev. Finance 19(3):1019–1052.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brealey RA, Myers SC, Allen F (2017) Principles of Corporate Finance, 12th ed. (McGraw-Hill Education, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chen DL, Schonger M, Wickens C (2016) oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. J. Behav. Experiment. Finance 9:88–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cipriani M, Guarino A (2009) Herd behavior in financial markets: An experiment with financial market professionals. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(1):206–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohn A, Fehr E, Maréchal M (2014) Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature 516:86–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conrad J, Dittmar RF, Ghysels E (2013) Ex ante skewness and expected stock returns. J. Finance 68(1):85–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhami S (2016) The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Diecidue E, Van De Ven J (2008) Aspiration level, probability of success and failure, and expected utility. Internat. Econom. Rev. 49(2):683–700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer JS, Sarin RK (1982) Relative risk aversion. Management Sci. 28(8):875–886.Google Scholar
  • Ebert S (2015) On skewed risks in economic models and experiments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 112:85–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebert S, Wiesen D (2011) Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. Management Sci. 57(7):1334–1349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn PC (1984) Foundations of risk measurement. I. Risk as probable loss. Management Sci. 30(4):396–406.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gennaioli N, Shleifer A, Vishny R (2015) Money doctors. J. Finance 70(1):91–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghysels E, Santa-Clara P, Valkanov R (2005) There is a risk-return trade-off after all. J. Financial Econom. 76(3):509–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser M, Iliewa Z, Weber M (2019) Thinking about prices vs. thinking about returns in financial markets. J. Finance 74(6):2997–3039.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gloede O, Menkhoff L (2014) Financial professionals’ overconfidence: Is it experience, function, or attitude? Eur. Financial Management 20(2):236–269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein D, Johnson E, Sharpe W (2008) Choosing outcomes vs. choosing products: Consumer-focused retirement investment advice. J. Consumer Res. 35:440–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber J, Palan S, Zeisberger S (2017) Does investor risk perception drive asset prices in markets? Experimental evidence. J. Banking Finance 108:105635.Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kaufmann C, Weber M, Haisley E (2013) The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one’s investment risk appetite. Management Sci. 59(2):323–340.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaustia M, Alho E, Puttonen V (2008) How much does expertise reduce behavioral biases? The case of anchoring effects in stock return estimates. Financial Management 37(3):391–412.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller LR, Sarin R, Weber M (1986) Empirical investigation of some properties of the perceived riskiness of gambles. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 38(1):114–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirchler, M, Lindner F, Weitzel U (2018) Rankings and risk-taking in the finance industry. J. Finance 73(5):2271–2302.Google Scholar
  • Klos A, Weber EU, Weber M (2005) Investment decisions and time horizon: Risk perception and risk behavior in repeated gambles. Management Sci. 51(12):1777–1790.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levy H, Levy M (2009) The safety first expected utility model: Experimental evidence and economic implications. J. Banking Finance 33(2):1494–1506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev. Econom. Statist. 47(1):13–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. 127(2):267–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lopes L (1987) Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 20:255–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1):77–91.Google Scholar
  • Mossin J (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 34(4):768–783.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nosić A, Weber M (2010) How riskily do I invest? The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and overconfidence. Decision Anal. 7(3):282–301.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Novemsky N, Kahneman D (2005) The boundaries of loss aversion. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):119–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puetz A, Ruenzi S (2011) Overconfidence among professional investors: Evidence from mutual fund managers. J. Bus. Finance Accounting 38(5–6):684–712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sachse K, Jungermann H, Belting JM (2012) Investment risk—The perspective of individual investors. J. Econom. Psych. 33(3):437–447.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finance 19(3):425–442.Google Scholar
  • Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal. 24(2):311–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Unser M (2000) Lower partial moments as measures of perceived risk: An experimental study. J. Econom. Psych. 21(3):253–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veld C, Veld-Merkoulova YV (2008) The risk perceptions of individual investors. J. Econom. Psych. 29(2):226–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vernimmen P, Quiry P, Dallocchio M, Le Fur Y, Salvi A (2014) Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK).Google Scholar
  • Weber EU, Bottom WP (1989) Axiomatic measures of perceived risk: Some tests and extensions. J. Behav. Decision Making 2(2):113–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber EU, Hsee C (1998) Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes toward perceived risk. Management Sci. 44(9):1205–1217.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber EU, Milliman RA (1997) Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Sci. 43(2):123–144.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M, Weber EU, Nosić A (2013) Who takes risks when and why: Determinants of changes in investor risk-taking. Rev. Finance 17(3):847–883.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeisberger S (2018) What is risk? How investors perceive risk in return distributions. Working paper, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.