The Isolated Choice Effect and Its Implications for Gender Diversity in Organizations

References

• Althouse S (2013) 23 books you didn’t read in high school but actually should. Buzzfeed (July 5), https://www.buzzfeed.com/spenceralthouse/23-books-you-didnt-read-in-high-school-but-actually-should.Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Recalde MP, Vesterlund L, Weingart L (2017) Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(3):714–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohnet I, Van Geen A, Bazerman M (2015) When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Sci. 62(5):1225–1234.Link, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2013) Salience and consumer choice. J. Political Econom. 121(5):803–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Babcock L, Loewenstein G, Thaler R (1997) Labor supply of New York City cabdrivers: One day at a time. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):407–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang EH, Milkman KL, Gromet DM, Rebele RW, Massey C, Duckworth AL, Grant AM (2019) The mixed effects of online diversity training. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(16):7778–7783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Schrage D, Kalev A (2015) Rage against the iron cage: The varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):1014–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forscher PS, Lai CK, Axt JR, Ebersole CR, Herman M, Devine PG, Nosek BA (2019) A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 117(3): 522–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones S, Donnelly G (2017). Why we logged every fortune 500 company’s diversity data, or lack thereof. Fortune (June 16), http://fortune.com/2017/06/16/why-we-logged-every-fortune-500-companys-diversity-data-or-lack-thereof/Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Lovallo D (1993) Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. 39(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E (2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(4):589–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwoh L (2012) Firms hail new chiefs (of diversity). Wall Street Journal (January 5), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203899504577129261732884578.Google Scholar
• Lai CK, Skinner AL, Cooley E, Murrar S, Brauer M, Devos T, Calanchini J, Xiao YJ, Pedram C, Marshburn CK, et al.. (2016) Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. J. Experiment. Psych. General 145(8):1001–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legault L, Gutsell JN, Inzlicht M (2011) Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psych. Sci. 22(12):1472–1477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma DS, Correll J, Wittenbrink B (2015) The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behav. Res. Methods 47(4):1122–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annu. Rev. Psych. 58(1):593–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips, LT, Slepian, ML, Hughes, BL (2018) Perceiving groups: The people perception of diversity and hierarchy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 114(5):766–785.Google Scholar
• Plant EA, Devine PG (2001) Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 37(6):486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Antonides G, Van den Ouden L, Trienekens H (2001) Which is better: Simultaneous or sequential choice? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84(1):54–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Loewenstein G (1995) Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 1(1):34–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D, Loewenstein G, Rabin M (1999) Choice bracketing. J. Risk Uncertainty 19(1-3):171–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schroeder J, Risen JL (2016) Befriending the enemy: Outgroup friendship longitudinally predicts intergroup attitudes in a coexistence program for Israelis and Palestinians. Group Processes Intergroup Relations 19(1):72–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1990) The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. J. Marketing Res. 27(2):150–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonson I, Winer RS (1992) The influence of purchase quantity and display format on consumer preference for variety. J. Consumer Res. 19(1):133–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1999) Mental accounting matters. J. Behav. Decision Making 12(3):183–206.Crossref, Google Scholar