Social Learning in Information Technology Investment: The Role of Board Interlocks

References

• Aitken BJ, Harrison AE (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(3):605–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson MC, Banker RD, Ravindran S (2003) The new productivity paradox. Comm. ACM 46(3):91–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benaroch M, Chernobai A (2017) Operational IT failures, IT value destruction, and board-level IT governance changes. MIS Quart. 41(3):729–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj S, Bharadwaj A, Bendoly E (2007) The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Inform. Systems Res. 18(4):437–453.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural-change as informational cascades. J. Polit. Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(3):151–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bizjak J, Lemmon M, Whitby R (2009) Option backdating and board interlocks. Rev. Financial Stud. 22(11):4821–4847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouwman CHS, Xuan Y (2012) Director overlap and firm financial policies. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Brick IE, Chidambaran NK (2010) Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. J. Corporate Finance 16(4):533–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JL (2011) The spread of aggressive corporate tax reporting: A detailed examination of the corporate-owned life insurance shelter. Accounting Rev. 86(1):23–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JL, Drake KD (2014) Network ties among low-tax firms. Accounting Rev. 89(2):483–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1:137–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Rev. 73(3):305–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Chen Y, Fang H (2009) Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):864–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Dhaliwal DS, Kim Y, Pan C (2014) Board interlocks and the diffusion of disclosure policy. Rev. Accounting Stud. 19(3):1086–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Westphal JD (2001) The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Acad. Management J. 44(4):639–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiu PC, Teoh SH, Tian F (2013) Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. Accounting Rev. 88(3):915–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer KL, Melville NP (2010) Does technological progress alter the nature of IT as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):392–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Conger JA, Finegold D, Lawler EE (1998) Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76:136–164.Google Scholar
• Conley TG, Udry CR (2010) Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):35–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connelly B, Johnson JL, Tihanyi L, Elistrand A (2011) More than adopters: Competing influences in the interlocking directorate. Organ. Sci. 22(3):688–703.Link, Google Scholar
• Corporate Board Member (2007) Board and information technology strategies report: Maximizing performance through IT strategy. Report, Corporate Board Member, Stamford, CT.Google Scholar
• Cotteleer MJ, Bendoly E (2006) Order lead-time improvement following enterprise information technology implementation: An empirical study. MIS Quart. 30(3):643–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G (1991) Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the inter-corporate networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(4):583–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehning B, Richardson VJ, Zmud RW (2007) The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms. J. Oper. Management 25(4):806–824.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deloitte Global Center for Corporate Governance (2011) The Tech-Intelligent Board: Priorities for Tech-Savvy Directors as They Oversee IT Risk and Strategy (Deloitte Global Services Limited, London).Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Ren F (2011) Information technology and firm boundaries: Impact on firm risk and return performance. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):369–388.Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Michael SC, Min CK (1998) Firm characteristics and investments in information technology: Scale and scope effects. Inform. Systems Res. 9(3):219–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Shi C, Gurbaxani V (2007) Investigating the risk-return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Management Sci. 53(12):1829–1842.Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenfeld B, Kolsky E, Topolinski T, Hagemeyer D, Grigg J (2003) Unused CRM Software Increases TCO and Decreases ROI. http://www.gartner.com.Google Scholar
• Faleye O, Hoitash R, Hoitash U (2011) The costs of intense board monitoring. J. Finance Econom. 101(1):160–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell KA, Whidbee DA (2003) Impact of firm performance expectations on CEO turnover and replacement decisions. J. Accounting Econom. 36(1–3):165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C (2005) The corporate digital divide: Determinants of Internet adoption. Management Sci. 51(4):641–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Meyer AD (2008) Crossing the organizational species barrier: How venture capital practices infiltrated the information technology sector. Acad. Management J. 51(5):976–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goyal V, Park C (2002) Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. J. Corporate Finance 8(1):49–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han K, Mithas S (2013) Information technology outsourcing and non-IT operating costs: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 37(1):315–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P, Beckman CM (1998) When do interlocks matter? Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):815–844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He J, Wang HC (2009) Innovative knowledge assets and economic performance: The asymmetric roles of incentives and monitoring. Acad. Management J. 52(5):919–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR, Stratman JK (2007) The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study on ERP, SCM, and CRM system implementations. J. Oper. Management 25(1):65–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Lim SS, Teoh SH (2009) Driven to distraction: Extraneous events and underreaction to earnings news. J. Finance 64(5):2289–2325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. 20(2):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho JLY, Wu A, Xu SX (2011) Corporate governance and returns on information technology investment: Evidence from an emerging market. Strategic Management J. 32(6):595–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D, Posavac SS, Kardes FR, Schneider MJ, Popovich DL (2015a) Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split. J. Consumer Psych. 25(4):652–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacobucci D, Posavac SS, Kardes FR, Schneider MJ, Popovich DL (2015b) The median split: Robust, refined, and revived. J. Consumer Psych. 25(4):690–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(2):323–329.Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Kubick TR, Miletkov MK, Wintoki MB (2018) Offshore expertise for onshore companies: Director connections to island tax havens and corporate tax policy. Management Sci. 64(7):3241–3268.Link, Google Scholar
• Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):386–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G (2017) Reflections on the 2016 decade award: Incorporating context in organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. 42(4):577–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaustia M, Rantala V (2015) Social learning and corporate peer effects. J. Finance Econom. 117(3):653–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil M, Tiwana A (2006) Relative importance of evaluation criteria for enterprise systems: a conjoint study. Inform. Systems J. 16(3):237–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein A (2002) Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. J. Accounting Econom. 33(3):375–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kobelsky KW, Richardson VJ, Smith RE, Zmud RW (2008) Determinants and consequences of firm information technology budgets. Accounting Rev. 83(4):957–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X (2004) Informational cascades in IT adoption. Comm. ACM 47(4):93–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Kauffman RJ, Yu F, Zhang Y (2014) Externalities, incentives and strategic complementarities: understanding herd behavior in IT adoption. Inform. Systems E-Bus. Management 12(3):443–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Asaba S (2006) Why do firms imitate each other? Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):366–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linck JS, Netter JM, Yang T (2008) The determinants of board structure. J. Finance Econom. 87(2):308–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipton M, Lorsch JW (1992) A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. Bus. Lawyer 48(1):59–77.Google Scholar
• Liu AZ, Liu H, Xu SX (2013) How do competitive environments moderate CRM value? Decision Support Systems 56(4):462–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee A, Brynjolfsson E (2008) Investing in the IT that makes a competitive difference. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(7/8):98–107.Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(1):237–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti A, Mitchell W (2013) How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quart. 37(2):511–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti A, Bardhan I, Goh JM (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 36(1):205–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra S (2005) Information technology as an enabler of growth in firms: An empirical assessment. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(2):279–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2010) Job characteristics and job satisfaction: Understanding the role of enterprise resource planning system implementation. MIS Quart. 34(1):143–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muhanna WA, Stoel MD (2010) How do investors value IT? An empirical investigation of the value relevance of IT capability and IT spending across industries. J. Inform. Systems 24(1):43–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nolan R, McFarlan FW (2005) Information technology and the board of directors. Harvard Bus. Rev. 83(10):96–106.Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers (2013) Boards Confront an Evolving Landscape: PwC’s Annual Corporate Directors Survey (PricewaterhouseCoopers Center for Board Governance, London).Google Scholar
• Rai A, Tang X (2014) Information technology-enabled business models: A conceptual framework and a coevolution perspective for future research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):1–14.Link, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Pavlou P, Im G, Du S (2012) Interfirm IT capabilities and communications for co-creating relational value: Evidence from the logistics industry. MIS Quart. 36(1):233–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan C, Brown CV (2006) ERP investments and the market value of firms: Toward an understanding of influential ERP project variables. Inform. Systems Res. 17(2):145–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Davis GF, Ward A (2000) Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: Why firms leave the NASDAQ and join the New York Stock Exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(2):268–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G, Barney JB, Muhanna WA (2004) Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 25(1):23–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G, Barney JB, Muhanna WA (2004) Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 25(1):23–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational employment statistics (OES) survey. Accessed January 24, 2020, https://www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm.Google Scholar
• Saldanha TJ, Melville NP, Ramirez R, Richardson VJ (2013) Information systems for collaborating vs. transacting: Impact on manufacturing plant performance in the presence of demand volatility. J. Oper. Management 31(6):313–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salge TO, Kohli R, Barrett M (2015) Investing in information systems: On the behavioral and institutional search mechanisms underpinning hospitals’ IS investment decisions. MIS Quart. 39(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Hartono E (2003) Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quart. 27(1):125–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipilov AV, Greve HR, Rowley TJ (2010) When do interlocks matter? Institutional logics and the diffusion of multiple corporate governance practices. Acad. Management J. 53(4):846–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen AT (2006) Social learning and health plan choice. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):929–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Yim S (2010) Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions. J. Finance Econom. 97(1):174–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2013) The effect of information technology–enabled flexibility on formation and market value of alliances. Management Sci. 59(1):207–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H, Uysal V (2011) Cross-business information technology integration and acquirer value creation in corporate mergers and acquisitions. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):703–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Teo HH, Wei KK, Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quart. 27(1):19–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vafeas N (1999) Board meeting frequency and firm performance. J. Finance Econom. 53(1):113–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang A, Zhang X, Hann I (2018) Socially nudged: A quasi-experimental study of friends’ social influence in online product ratings. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):641–655.Link, Google Scholar
• Yiu DW, Xu Y, Wan WP (2014) The deterrence effects of vicarious punishments on corporate financial fraud. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1549–1571.Link, Google Scholar
• Young HP (2009) Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: Contagion, social influence, and social learning. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1899–1924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K (2004) Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Sci. 50(5):670–685.Link, Google Scholar