Subcoalition Cluster Analysis: A New Method for Modeling Conflict in Organizations

References

• Ahuja RK, Magnanti TL, Orlin JB (1993) Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S (2007) k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. Proc. 18th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 1027–1035.Google Scholar
• Atkinson N, Ganz SC, Hochbaum DS, Orlin JB (2023) The strong maximum circulation algorithm: A new method for aggregating preference rankings. Preprint, submitted July 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15702.Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Greve HR (2021) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Multiple Goals: A Multiple Goals Perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aziz H, Savani R, Moulin H (2016) Hedonic games. Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD, eds. Handbook of Computational Social Choice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartholdi J, Tovey CA, Trick MA (1989) Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election. Social Choice Welfare 6(2):157–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Obloj T, Pache AC, Sengul M (2022) Beyond shareholder value maximization: Accounting for financial/social trade-offs in dual-purpose companies. Acad. Management Rev. 47(2):237–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Pache AC, Sengul M, Kimsey M (2019) The dual-purpose playbook. Harvard Bus. Rev. 97(2):124–133.Google Scholar
• Bogomolnaia A, Jackson MO (2002) The stability of hedonic coalition structures. Games Econom. Behav. 38(2):201–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boutyline A (2017) Improving the measurement of shared cultural schemas with correlational class analysis: Theory and method. Sociol. Sci. 4(15):353–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bubb R, Catan EM (2022) The party structure of mutual funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 35(6):2839–2878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Centola D, González-Avella JC, Eguíluz VM, San Miguel M (2007) Homophily, cultural drift, and the co-evolution of cultural groups. J. Conflict Resolution 51(6):905–929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chappell B (2014) Sportswriter who let readers fill out hall of fame ballot is banned. Accessed December 19, 2024, https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/01/09/261229164/sportswriter-who-let-readers-fill-out-hall-of-fame-ballot-is-banned.Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Dalton M (1950) Unofficial union-management relations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 15(5):611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaPosta D, Shi Y, Macy M (2015) Why do liberals drink lattes? Amer. J. Sociol. 120(5):1473–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Sotoudeh R, Goldberg A, Shepherd H (2018) Culture out of attitudes: Relationality, population heterogeneity and attitudes toward science and religion in the U.S. Poetics 68:31–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer F, Hudry O, Niedermeier R (2016) Weighted tournament solutions. Brandt F, Conitzer V, Endriss U, Lang J, Procaccia AD, eds. Handbook of Computational Social Choice (Cambridge University Press, New York), 85–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaba V, Greve HR (2019) Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals. Organ. Sci. 30(4):647–667.Link, Google Scholar
• Ganz SC (2023) Conflict, chaos, and the art of institutional design. Organ. Sci. 35(1):138–158.Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D, Ocasio W (2007) Perspective–neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future. Organ. Sci. 18(3):523–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA, Ocasio W (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A (2011) Mapping shared understandings using relational class analysis: The case of the cultural omnivore reexamined. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(5):1397–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg A, Stein SK (2018) Beyond social contagion: Associative diffusion and the emergence of cultural variation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(5):897–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupte M, Shankar P, Li J, Muthukrishnan S, Iftode L (2011) Finding hierarchy in directed online social networks. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 557–566.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Li J, Xin K, Tsui AS (2001) Compositional gaps and downward spirals in international joint venture management groups. Strategic Management J. 22(11):1033–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer Series in Statistics, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ, Snyder JM Jr (1997) Linear probability models of the demand for attributes with an empirical application to estimating the preferences of legislators. RAND J. Econom. 28:S142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochbaum DS, Levin A (2006) Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Management Sci. 52(9):1394–1408.Link, Google Scholar
• Inglehart R, Baker WE (2000) Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(1):19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackman S (2001) Multidimensional analysis of roll call data via Bayesian simulation: Identification, estimation, inference, and model checking. Political Analysis 9(3):227–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jakulin A, Buntine W, Pira TML, Brasher H (2009) Analyzing the U.S. Senate in 2003: Similarities, clusters, and blocs. Political Analysis 17(3):291–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James B (1994) The Politics of Glory: How Baseball’s Hall of Fame Really Works (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Joseph J, Gaba V (2020) Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):267–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2019) The 360-Degree Corporation: From Stakeholder Trade-offs to Transformation (Stanford Business Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Kellogg K (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kemeny JG (1959) Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus 88(4):577–591.Google Scholar
• Keri J (2013) The fallacy of the baseball hall of fame. http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-fallacy-of-the-baseball-hall-of-fame/.Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Pham DN (2024) Bringing politics back in: The role of power and coalitions in organizational adaptation. Organ. Sci. 35(5):1704–1720.Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Rerup C (2021) The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organi. Sci. 32(3):527–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Hambrick DC (2005) Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Management J. 48(5):794–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linzer DA (2011) Reliable inference in highly stratified contingency tables: Using latent class models as density estimators. Political Analysis 19(2):173–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. J. Politics 24(4):662–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• McCarthy JD, Zald MN (1977) Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. Amer. J. Sociol. 82(6):1212–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1983) Power in and Around Organizations. The Theory of Management Policy Series (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Mithani MA, O’Brien JP (2021) So what exactly is a “coalition” within an organization? A review and organizing framework. J. Management 47(1):171–206.Google Scholar
• Orlowski A (2013) Revolting peasants force Wikipedia to cut’n’paste Visual Editor into the bin. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/09/25/wikipedia_peasants_revolt/.Google Scholar
• Poole KT, Rosenthal H (1985) A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. Amer. J. Political Sci. 29(2):357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Potthoff R (2018) Estimating ideal points from roll-call data: Explore principal components analysis, especially for more than one dimension? Social Sci. 7(2):12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preud’homme G, Duarte K, Dalleau K, Lacomblez C, Bresso E, Smaïl-Tabbone M, Couceiro M, et al. (2021) Head-to-head comparison of clustering methods for heterogeneous data: A simulation-driven benchmark. Scientific Rep. 11(1):4202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Zbaracki MJ (2021) The politics of learning from rare events. Organ. Sci. 32(6):1391–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Rico N, Vela CR, Díaz I (2023) Reducing the time required to find the Kemeny ranking by exploiting a necessary condition for being a winner. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 305(3):1323–1336.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1988) Introduction to the Shapley value. Roth AE, ed. The Shapley Value: Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson T (2013) Will Wikipedia’s pretty new editing software solve its recruitment crisis? Accessed December 24, 2024, https://www.dailydot.com/business/wikipedia-visual-editor-wysiwyg/.Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Silver N (2013) In Cooperstown, a crowded waiting room. Accessed December 24, 2024, https://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/12/in-cooperstown-a-crowded-waiting-room/.Google Scholar
• Sotoudeh R, DiMaggio P (2023) Coping with plenitude: A computational approach to selecting the right algorithm. Sociol. Methods Res. 52(4):1838–1882.Google Scholar
• Stevenson WB, Pearce JL, Porter LW (1985) The concept of “coalition” in organization theory and research. Acad. Management Rev. 10(2):256–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suh B, Convertino G, Chi EH, Pirolli P (2009) The singularity is not near: Slowing growth of Wikipedia. Proc. 5th Internat. Sympos. Wikis Open Collaboration (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Thompson JD, McEwen WJ (1958) Organizational goals and environment: Goal-setting as an interaction process. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 23(1):23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R, Walther G, Hastie T (2001) Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 63(2):411–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Gunten T, Martin J, Teplitskiy M (2016) Consensus, polarization, and alignment in the economics profession. Sociol. Sci. 3:1028–1052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Luxburg U (2010) Clustering stability: An overview. Foundations Trends Machine Learn. 2(3):235–274.Google Scholar
• Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wales J (2009) State of the Wiki. Accessed December 24, 2024, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:State_of_the_Wiki.pdf.Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Escobedo AR (2021) A new binary programming formulation and social choice property for Kemeny rank aggregation. Decision Analysis 18(4):296–320.Link, Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ, Bergen M (2010) When truces collapse: A longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organ. Sci. 21(5):955–972.Link, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E, Sgourev S (2006) Peer capitalism: Parallel relationships in the U.S. economy. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(5):1327–1366.Crossref, Google Scholar