Getting Their Hands Dirty: How Female Managers Motivate Female Worker Productivity Through Subordinate Scut Work

References

• Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abendroth A, Melzer S, Kalev A, Tomaskovic-Devey D (2017) Women at work: Women’s access to power and the gender earnings gap. ILR Rev. 70(1):190–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abraham M (2017) Pay formalization revisited: Considering the effects of manager gender and discretion on closing the gender wage gap. Academic Management J. 60(1):29–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender Soc. 4(2):139–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Appelbaum E (2000) Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Baldassarri D (2015) Cooperative networks: Altruism, group solidarity, reciprocity, and sanctioning in Ugandan producer organizations. Am. J. Sociol. 121(2):355–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR, Kunda G (1992) Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):363–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Newman AE (1990) For what it’s worth: Organizations, occupations, and the value of work done by women and nonwhites. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 55(2):155–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass BM (1990) From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organ. Dynam. 18(3):19–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendix R (1956) Work and Authority in Industry: Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bersade S, Meisiek S 2004. Leading by doing. Chowdhury S, ed. Next Generation Business Handbook (Wiley, New York), 107–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M, Briscoe F, Fernandez-Mateo I, Sterling A (2013) The employment relationship and inequality: How and why changes in employment practices are reshaping rewards in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):61–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Genakos C, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Management practices across firms and countries. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(1):12–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J (2013) Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quart. J. Econom. 128(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blum TC, Fields DL, Goodman JS (1994) Organization-level determinants of women in management. Acad. Management J. 37(2):241–268.Google Scholar
• Budhwar PS, Debrah YA (2013) Human Resource Management in Developing Countries (Routledge, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappelli P (1999) The New Deal at Work: Managing the Market-Driven Workforce (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Carli LL, Eagly AH (2001) Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):629–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2011) Bringing managers back in managerial influences on workplace inequality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):667–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Benard S (2010) The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):543–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan CK, Anteby M (2016) Task segregation as a mechanism for within-job inequality: Women and men of the Transportation Security Administration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(2):184–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strategic Management J. 40(3):331–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi Y, Mai-Dalton RR (1999) The model of followers’ responses to self-sacrificial leadership: An empirical test. Leadership Quart. 10(3):397–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cohen PN, Huffman ML (2007) Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(5):681–704.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins R (2004) Interaction Ritual Chains (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1987) Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 12(4):637–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (1994) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Dezsö CL, Ross DG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1072–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doering L, Thebaud S (2017) The effects of gendered occupational roles on men’s and women’s workplace authority: Evidence from microfinance. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(3):542–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drouvelis M, Nosenzo D (2013) Group identity and leading-by-example. J. Econom. Psych. 39:414–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kremer M (2007) Using randomization in development economics research: A toolkit. Schultz TP, Strauss J, eds. Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam), 3895–3962.Google Scholar
• Eagly AH (2013) Gender and Work: Challenging Conventional Wisdom (Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Carli LL (1981) Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psych. Bull. 90(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC (2001) The leadership styles of women and men. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):781–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Johnson BT (1990) Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 108(2):233–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Johannesen-Schmidt MC, van Engen ML (2003) Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psych. Bull. 129(4):569–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ, Makhijani MG (1995) Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 117(1):125–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Wood W, Diekman AB (2000) Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. Eckes T, Trautner HM, eds. The Development Social Psychology of Gender (Taylor and Francis, Mahwah, NJ) 123–174.Google Scholar
• Fine GA, Elsbach KD (2000) Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory building: Tactics for integrating qualitative field data with quantitative lab data. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 36(1):51–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fletcher JK (2001) Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gilbreth FB (1911) Motion Study: A Method for Increasing the Efficiency of the Workman (D. Van Nostrand, New York).Google Scholar
• Gittell JH (2003) The Southwest Airlines Way: Using the Power of Relationships to Achieve High Performance (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Glick P, Fiske ST, Mladinic A, Saiz JL, Abrams D, Masser B, Adetoun B (2000) Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(5):763–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glick P, Lameiras M, Fiske ST, Eckes T, Masser B, Volpato C, Manganelli AM, et al.. (2004) Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 86(5):713–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Imas A (2016) Laboratory in the Field: Measuring Preferences in the Wild (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1961) Encounters; Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction (Martino Fine Books, Eastford, CT).Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Nelson A, Siino R (2014) Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Acad. Management J. 58(1):136–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guarino CM, Borden VM (2017) Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Res. Higher Ed. 58(6):672–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn C (2008) Doing Qualitative Research Using Your Computer (Sage Publications, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassink WH, Fernandez RM (2017) Worker morale and effort: Is the relationship causal? The Manchester School. 86(6):816–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE (1998) Toward an economic theory of leadership: Leading by example. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(5):1188–1206.Google Scholar
• Herzberg FI (1966) Work and the Nature of Man (World, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Hughes EC (1958) Men and Their Work (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
• Huising R (2014) To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):263–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hultin M, Szulkin R (2003) Mechanisms of inequality. Unequal access to organizational power and the gender wage gap. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 19(2):143–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huselid MA (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. 38(3):635–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87:291–313.Google Scholar
• Jacobs JA (1992) Women’s entry into management: Trends in earnings, authority, and values among salaried managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(3):282–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacoby HG (1991) Productivity of men and women and the sexual division of labor in peasant agriculture of the Peruvian Sierra. J. Developmental Econom. 37(1-2):265–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Son J, Roh H (2015) When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1516–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn WA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Management J. 33(4):692–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research and Policy (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2010) Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery. Organ. Sci. 22:482–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Hodges SD (2001) Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(2):720–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kmec JA (2008) The process of sex segregation in a gender-typed field: The case of male nurses. Sociol. Perspect. 51(2):259–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Bailey DE (2008) Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 32(2):411–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luthans F, Avolio BJ (2003) Authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship (Barrett-Koehler, San Francisco), 241–261.Google Scholar
• Macchiavello R, Menzel A, Woodruff C (2015) Managerial capital and productivity: Evidence from a training program in the Bangladeshi garment sector. Working paper, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
• Macduffie JP (1995) Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 48(2):197–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manz CC, Sims HP Jr (1980) Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 5(3):361–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maume DJ (1999) Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work Occupations 26(4):483–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayo E (1933) The Human Problems of an Industrial Organization (McMillan, New York).Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery J (1832) The Theory and Practice of Cotton Spinning: Showing the Use of Machine (D. Appleton and Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Nieva VF, Gutek BA (1981) Women and Work: A Psychological Perspective (Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Osterman P, Kochan TA, Locke RM, Piore MJ (2002) Working in America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Owen R (1813) A New View of Society: Or, Essays on the Principle of Formation of the Human Character, and the Application of the Principle to Practice (Cadell & Davies, London).Google Scholar
• Paustian‐Underdahl S, Slattery Walker L, Woehr D (2014) Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators J. Appl. Psych. 99(6):1125–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penner AM, Toro-Tulla HJ, Huffman ML (2012) Do women managers ameliorate gender differences in wages? Evidence from a large grocery retailer. Sociol. Perspect. 55(2):365–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell GN (2018) Women and Men in Management (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Pugh MD, Wahrman R (1983) Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? Amer. J. Sociol. 88(4):746–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR (1989) Barriers to mentoring: The female manager’s dilemma. Human Relations 42(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A (2018) The artisan and his audience: Price-setting and identification with work in a handicraft cluster in southern India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):637–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A, Benson A (2020) A stitch in time: Work complexity and the divergent effects of employee monitoring on productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Reskin BF, McBrier DB (2000) Why not ascription? Organizations’ employment of male and female managers. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(2):210–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reskin BR (1993) Sex segregation in the workplace. Annual Rev. Sociol. 19(1):241–270.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2000) The formation of status beliefs: Improving status construction theory. Adv. Group Processes 17:77–102.Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP (2001) Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (1999) Feminized management and backlash toward agenticwomen: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5):1004–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2012) The Social Psychology of Gender: How Power and Intimacy Shape Gender Relations (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ryan MK, Haslam SA (2007) The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):549–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Ed. Psych. Measures 66(4):701–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shamir B, House RJ, Arthur MB (1993) The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organ. Sci. 4(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith N, Smith V, Verner M (2006) Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. Internat. J. Production Performance Management 55(7):569–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SB, Sherman EL (2015) Agents of change or cogs in the machine? Reexamining the influence of female managers on the gender wage gap. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(6):1778–1808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor FW (1914) Scientific management. Sociol. Rev. 7(3):266–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Technopak (2015) Textile and Apparel Compendium (Technopak, New Delhi, India).Google Scholar
• Trevino LK, Brown ME (2005) The role of leaders in influencing unethical behavior in the workplace. Kidwell R, Martin C, eds. Managing Organizational Deviance (Sage Publications, London), 69–87.Google Scholar
• Tully LM, Boudewyn MA (2018) Creating a Novel Experimental Paradigm: A Practical Guide (SAGE Publications, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Sitkin SB (2013) A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1996) Drop your tools: An allegory for organizational studies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):301–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West C, Zimmerman DH (1987) Doing gender. Gender Soc. 1(2):125–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CL (1992) The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the ‘female’ professions. Soc. Problems 39(3):253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams CL (1995) Still a Man’s World (University of California Press, Berkeley).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams JE, Best DL 1990. Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Multination Study (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Wingfield AH (2009) Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender Soc. 23(1):5–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaffe T, Kark R (2011) Leading by example: The case of leader OCB. J. Appl. Psych. 96(4):806–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukl G (1989) Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. J. Management 15(2):251–289.Crossref, Google Scholar