The Role of Beliefs in Driving Gender Discrimination

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3660

References

  • Altonji JG, Blank RM (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Handbooks in Economics, vol. 3C (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 3143–3259.Google Scholar
  • Arrow K (1973) The theory of discrimination. Ashenfelter O, Rees A, eds. Discrimination in Labor Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 3–33.Google Scholar
  • Ayres I, Siegelman P (1995) Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(3):304–321.Google Scholar
  • Azmat G, Petrongolo B (2014) Gender and the labor market: What have we learned from field and lab experiments? Labour Econom. 30(C):32–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baert S, De Pauw A-S, Deschacht N (2016) Do employer preferences contribute to sticky floors? Ind. Labor Relations Rev. 69(3):714–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagues MF, Esteve-Volart B (2010) Can gender parity break the glass ceiling? Evidence from a repeated randomized experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(4):1301–1328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartoš V, Bauer M, Chytilová J, Matějka F (2016) Attention discrimination: Theory and field experiments with monitoring information acquisition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(6):1437–1475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS (1957) The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M (2011) New perspectives on gender. Card D, Ashenfelter O, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, Handbooks in Economics, vol. 4B (North Holland, Amsterdam), 1543–1590.Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E (2017) Field experiments on discrimination. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, eds. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, Handbook of Field Experiments, vol. 1 (North Holland, Amsterdam),309–393.Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black SE, Strahan PE (2001) The division of spoils: Rent-sharing and discrimination in a regulated industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):814–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau FD, Kahn LM (2017) The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econom. Literature 55(3):789–865.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bohnet I, van Geen A, Bazerman M (2016) When performance trumps gender bias: Joint versus separate evaluation. Management Sci. 62(5):1225–1234.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10): 3395–3436.Google Scholar
  • Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Stereotypes. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1753–1794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bordalo P, Coffman KB, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brewer MB (1979) In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psych. Bull. 86(2):307–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cappelen AW, Falch R, Tungodden B (2019) The boy crisis: Experimental evidence on the acceptance of males falling behind. NNH Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 06/2019, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  • Card D, Cardoso AR, Kline P (2016) Bargaining, sorting, and the gender wage gap: Quantifying the impact of firms on the relative pay of women. Quart. J. Econom. 131(2):633–686.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castillo M, Petrie R (2010) Discrimination in the lab: Does information trump appearance? Games Econom. Behav. 68(1):50–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castillo M, Petrie R, Torero M, Vesterlund L (2013) Gender differences in bargaining outcomes: A field experiment on discrimination. J. Public Econom. 99(March):35–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charles KK, Guryan J (2008) Prejudice and wages: An empirical assessment of Becker’s The Economics of Discrimination. J. Political Econom. 116(5):773–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charles KK, Guryan J (2011) Studying discrimination: Fundamental challenges and recent progress. Annu. Rev. Econom. 3(1):479–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen R, Chen Y (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2562–2589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Li SX (2009) Group identity and social preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):431–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Li SX, Liu TX, Shih M (2014) Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games Econom. Behav. 84(March):58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danilov A, Saccardo S (2017) Disguised discrimination. Working paper, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar
  • De Paola M, Scoppa V (2015) Gender discrimination and evaluators’ gender: Evidence from Italian academia. Economica 82(325):162–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickinson DL, Oaxaca RL (2009) Statistical discrimination in labor markets: An experimental analysis. Southern Econom. J. 76(1):16–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dickinson DL, Oaxaca RL (2014) Wages, employment, and statistical discrimination: Evidence from the laboratory. Econom. Inquiry 52(4):1380–1391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doleac JL, Stein LCD (2013) The visible hand: Race and online market outcomes. Econom. J. 123(572):F469–F492.Google Scholar
  • Exley CL (2016) Excusing selfishness in charitable giving: The role of risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. 83(2):587–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fershtman C, Gneezy U (2001) Discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):351–377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gino F, Norton MI, Weber RA (2016) Motivated Bayesians: Feeling moral while acting egoistically. J. Econom. Perspect. 30(3):189–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, List J, Price MK (2012) Toward an understanding of why people discriminate: Evidence from a series of natural field experiments. NBER Working Paper No. 17855, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Goldin C (2014) A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1091–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guryan J, Charles KK (2013) Taste-based or statistical discrimination: The economics of discrimination returns to its roots. Econom. J. 123(572):F417–F432.Google Scholar
  • Haisley EC, Weber RA (2010) Self-serving interpretations of ambiguity in other-regarding behavior. Games Econom. Behav. 68(2):614–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halberda J, Ly R, Wilmer JB, Naiman DQ, Germine L (2012) Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive internet-based sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(28):11116–11120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. 108(3):480–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lei L, Babcock LC (2013) Asian Americans and workplace discrimination: The interplay between sex of evaluators and the perception of social skills. J. Organ. Behav. 34(3):310–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA (2004) The nature and extent of discrimination in the marketplace: Evidence from the field. Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):48–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milkman KL, Akinola M, Chugh D (2012) Temporal distance and discrimination: An audit study in academia. Psych. Sci. 23(7):710–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milkman KL, Akinola M, Chugh D (2015) What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1678–1712.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mobius MM, Rosenblat TS (2006) Why beauty matters. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):222–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J (2012) Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(41):16474–16479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neumark D, Bank RJ, Van Nort KD (1996) Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. Quart. J. Econom. 111(3):915–941.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M (2016) Gender. Kagel J, Roth AE, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol. 2 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ),481–553.Google Scholar
  • Olivetti C, Petrongolo B (2016) The evolution of gender gaps in industrialized countries. Annu. Rev. Econom. 8(1):405–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment Decision Making 5(5):411–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps ES (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(4):659–661.Google Scholar
  • Rand DG (2012) The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. J. Theoret. Biol. 299(April):172–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao G (2019) Familiarity does not breed contempt: Generosity, discrimination, and diversity in Delhi schools. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):774–809.Google Scholar
  • Reuben E, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2014) How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(12):4403–4408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riach PA, Rich J (2002) Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Econom. J. 112(483):F480–F518.Google Scholar
  • Sarsons H (2017a) Interpreting signals in the labor market: Evidence from medical referrals. Working paper, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Sarsons H (2017b) Recognition for group work: Gender differences in academia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):141–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 1(2):149–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.