Destigmatization and Its Imbalanced Effects in Labor Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3881

References

  • Altman BM (1981) Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Soc. Problems 28(3):321–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • American Business Consultants (1950) Red Channels: The Report of Communist Influence in Radio and Television (Counterattack, New York).Google Scholar
  • American Film Institute (AFI) (1993–1999) The American Film Institute Catalog of Motion Pictures Produced in the United States: Feature Films, 1941–1950, 1951–1960, 1961–1970 (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashenfelter O (1978) Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. Rev. Econom. Statist. 60(1):47–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W, Faulkner RR (1991) Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(2):279–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker H (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences–in–differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Botelho TL, Abraham M (2017) Pursuing quality: How search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double standards in a multistage evaluation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):698–730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspective Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler J, Shapiro D (2016) Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psych. 12:53–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christopherson S, Storper M (1989) The effects of flexible specialization on industrial politics and the labor market: The motion picture industry. Industry. Labor Related Rev. 42(3):331–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cogley J (1956) Report on Blacklisting, vol. I: Movies (Fund for the Republic, New York).Google Scholar
  • Combs JE (1990) American Political Movies: An Annotated Filmography of Feature Films (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  • Dennis SA, Goodson BM, Pearson C (2020) Online worker fraud and evolving threats to the integrity of mTurk data: A discussion of virtual private servers and the limitations of IP-based screening procedures. Behav. Res. Accounting 32(1):119–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devine PG, Forscher PS, Austin AJ, Cox WTL (2012) Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(6):1267–1278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F, Schrage D, Kalev A (2015) Rage against the iron cage: The varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):1014–1044.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dovidio JF, Major B, Crocker J (2000) The social psychology of stigma. Heatherton TF, Kleck RE, Hebl MR, Hull JG, eds. (2000) Stigma: Introduction and Overview (Guilford Press, New York), 1–28.Google Scholar
  • Dreyfuss E (2018) A bot panic hits Amazon Mechanical Turk. Accessed December 6, 2019, www.wired.com/story/amazon-mechanical-turk-bot-panic/.Google Scholar
  • Fine GA (2001) Difficult Reputations: Collective Memories of the Evil, Inept and Controversial (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fine GA (2012) Sticky Reputations: The Politics of Collective Memory in Midcentury America (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 23:1–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P (2007) Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cognitive Sci. 11(2):77–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):878–902.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer A, Mead AD, Huang J (2015) Inattentive responding in mTurk and other online samples. Industry Organ. Psych. 8(2):196–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gawronski B, Bodenhausen GV (2006) Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psych. Bull. 132(5):692–731.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gawronski B, LeBel EEP (2008) Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 44(5):1355–1361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Goodman JK, Cryder CE, Cheema A (2013) Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. J. Behav. Decision Making 26(3):213–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(6):1464–1480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gregg AP, Seibt B, Banaji MR (2006) Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hebl MR, Mannix LM (2003) The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 29(1):28–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones EE, Farina A, Hastorf AH, Markus H, Miller DT, Scott RA (1984) Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships (WH Freeman & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Jonsson S, Greve HR, Fujiwara–Greve T (2009) Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reporting corporate deviance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):195–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulik CT, Bainbridge HT, Cregan C (2008) Known by the company we keep: Stigma-by-association effects in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):216–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurzban R, Leary MR (2001) Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psych. Bull. 127(2):187–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Link BG, Phelan JC (2001) Conceptualizing stigma. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:363–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Litman L, Robinson Y, Moss AJ, Gautam R (2018) Moving beyond bots: mTurk as a source of high quality data. Accessed December 14, 2020, www.cloudresearch.com/resources/blog/moving-beyond-bots-mturk-as-a-source-of-high-quality-data/.Google Scholar
  • Livneh H, Chan F, Kaya C (2014) Stigma related to physical and sensory disabilities. Corrigan PW, ed. The Stigma of Disease and Disability (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 93–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McDonnell M-H, Werner T (2016) Blacklisted businesses: Social activists’ challenges and the disruption of corporate political activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):584–620.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagi SZ, McBroom WH, Collette J (1972) Work, employment, and the disabled. J. Econom. Sociol. 31(1):21–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Necka EA, Cacioppo S, Norman GJ, Cacioppo JT (2016) Measuring the prevalence of problematic respondent behaviors among MTurk, campus, and community participants. PLoS One. 11(6):e0157732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Negro G, Goodman S (2015) Niche overlap and discrediting acts: An empirical analysis of informing in Hollywood. Sociol. Sci. 2:308–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen KE (2012) A Disability History of the United States, vol. 2 (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Paetzold RL, Dipboye RL, Elsbach KD (2008) A new look at stigmatization in and of organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):186–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paolacci G, Chandler J (2014) Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Curr. Direction Psych. Sci. 23(3):184–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Penny H, Haddock G (2007) Anti-fat prejudice among children: The “mere proximity” effect in 5–10 year olds. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43(4):678–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pescosolido BA, Martin JK (2015) The stigma complex. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 41:87–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pescosolido BA, Medina TR, Martin JK, Long JS (2013) The “backbone” of stigma: Identifying the global core of public prejudice associated with mental illness. Amer. J. Public Health 103(5):853–860.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phelan JC, Link BG, Stueve A, Pescosolido BA (2000) Public conceptions of mental illness in 1950 and 1996: What is mental illness and is it to be feared? J. Health Soc. Behav. 41(2):188–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plant EA, Devine PG (1998) Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(3):811–832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pontikes EG, Negro G, Rao H (2010) Stained red? A study of stigma by association to blacklisted artists during the “red scare” in Hollywood, 1945–1960. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(3):456–478.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pryor JB, Reeder GD, Monroe AE (2012) The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(2):224–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pryor JB, Reeder GD, Yeadon C, Hesson-McInnis M (2004) A dual-process model of reactions to perceived stigma. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(4):436–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raen LR, Paetzold RL, Colella A (2008) A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments. Human Resources Management Rev. 18(3):191–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rohmer O, Louvet E (2018) Implicit stereotyping against people with disability. Group Processing Intergroup Relations 21(1):127–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith J (1989) “A good business proposition”: Dalton Trumbo, Spartacus, and the end of the blacklist. Velvet Light Trap 23(1):75–100.Google Scholar
  • Stuber J, Meyer I, Link B (2008) Stigma, prejudice, discrimination and health. Soc. Sci. Medicine 67(3):351–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton RI, Callahan AL (1987) The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Acad. Management J. 30(3):405–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilcsik A (2011) Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. Am. J. Sociol. 117(2):586–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Congress HUAC (1952) Annual Report (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Walther E (2002) Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):919–934.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Warren CAB (1980) Destigmatization of identity: From deviant to charismatic. Qualitative Sociol. 3(1):59–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitfield SJ (1996) The Culture of the Cold War, 2nd ed. (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW, Kim T-Y, Ukanwa K, von Rittman J (2003) Robust identities or non-entities? Typecasting in the feature film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.