Valuation of New Trademarks

References

• Abarbanell JS, Bernard VL (1992) Tests of analysts’ overreaction/underreaction to earnings information as an explanation for anomalous stock price behavior. J. Finance 47(3):1181–1207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aboody D, Lev B (1998) The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization. J. Accounting Res. 36:161–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aboody D, Lev B (2000) Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. J. Finance 55:2747–2766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• American Intellectual Property Law Association (2013) Report of the Economic Survey (American Intellectual Property Law Association, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
• Baker M, Wurgler J (2006) Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. J. Finance 61(4):1645–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barth ME, Clement MB, Foster G, Kasznik R (1998) Brand values and capital market valuation. Rev. Accounting Stud. 3:41–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belo F, Lin XJ, Vitorino MA (2014) Brand capital and firm value. Rev. Econom. Dynamics 17:150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berk JB, Green RC, Naik V (2004) Valuation and return dynamics of new ventures. Rev. Financial Stud. 17:1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard VL, Thomas JK (1990) Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings. J. Accounting Econom. 13(4):305–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besen SM, Raskind LJ (1991) An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property. J. Econom. Perspective 5:3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bosworth D, Rogers M (2001) Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Econom. Record 77:323–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brauneis R, Heald P (2011) Trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and the decline in sharing of famous brand names: an introduction and empirical study. Buffalo Law Rev. 59(1):141–212.Google Scholar
• Carhart MM (1997) On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52(1):57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Liu B, Wang H, Wang Z, Yu J (2018) Characteristics-based factors. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Chambers D, Jennings R, Thompson RB (2002) Excess returns to R&D-intensive firms. Rev. Accounting Stud. 7(2-3):133–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan LKC, Lakonishok J, Sougiannis T (2001) The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. J. Finance 56:2431–2456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheong FS, Thomas J (2011) Why do EPS forecast error and dispersion not vary with scale? Implications for analyst and managerial behavior. J. Accounting Res. 49:359–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen DA, Hann RN, Ogneva M (2007) Another look at GAAP vs. the street: An empirical assessment of measurement error bias. Rev. Accounting Stud. 12:271–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Frazzini A (2008) Economic links and predictable returns. J. Finance 63:1977–2011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Lou D (2012) Complicated firms. J. Financial Econom. 104:383–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Diether K, Malloy C (2013) Misvaluing innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 26:635–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Malloy C, Nguyen Q (2019) Lazy prices. Academic research colloquium for financial planning and related disciplines. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Corrado C, Hulten C (2010) How do you measure a technological revolution? Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:99–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Titman S (1997) Evidence on the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns. J. Finance 52:1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Grinblatt M, Titman S, Wermers R (1997) Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks. J. Finance 52(3):1035–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng Z, Lev B, Narin F (1999) Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Anal. J. 55:20–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dichev ID, Tang VW (2009) Earnings volatility and earnings predictability. J. Accounting Econom. 47:160–181.Google Scholar
• Dou W, Ji Y, Reibstein D, Wu W (2020) Inalienable customer capital, corporate liquidity, and stock returns. J. Finance Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eberhart AC, Maxwell WF, Siddique AR (2004) An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. J. Finance 59:623–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ertekin L, Sorescu A, Houston MB (2018) Hands off my brand! The financial consequences of protecting brands through trademark infringement lawsuits. J. Marketing 82:45–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, MacBeth J (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. J. Political Econom. 81(3):607–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, French K (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47(2):427–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, French K (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, French K (1997) Industry costs of equity. J. Financial Econom. 43(2):153–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E, French K (2015) A five-factor asset pricing model. J. Financial Econom. 116(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faurel L, Li Q, Shanthikumar D, Teoh S (2019) Bringing Innovation to Fruition: Insights from New Trademarks. Working paper, Arizona State University and University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald T, Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2020) Innovation search strategy and predictable returns. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Fosfuri A, Giarratana MS (2009) Masters of war: Rivals’ product innovation and new advertising in mature product markets. Management Sci. 55:181–191.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao G, Hitt LM (2012) Information technology and trademarks: Implications for product variety. Management Sci. 58:1211–1226.Link, Google Scholar
• González-Pedraz C, Mayordomo S (2012) Trademark activity and the market performance of U.S. commercial banks. J. Bus. Econom. Management 13:931–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham SJ, Hancock G, Marco AC, Myers AF (2013) The USPTO trademark case files data set: Descriptions, lessons, and insights. J. Econom. Management Strategy 22:669–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh C, Rogers M (2006) The value of innovation: The interaction of competition, R&D and IP. Res. Policy 35:562–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh C, Rogers M, Schautschick P, Sena V (2011) Trademark incentives. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1981) Market value, R&D, and patents. Econom. Lett. 7:183–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grullon G, Kanatas G, Weston JP (2004) Advertising, breadth of ownership, and liquidity. Rev. Financial Stud. 17:439–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH (1993) The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980’s. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83:259–264.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36:16–38.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Helmers C, Rogers M, Sena V (2014) The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. J. Econom. Literature 52:375–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath D, Mace C (2020) The strategic effects of trademark protection. Rev. Financial Stud. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Teoh SH (2003) Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. J. Accounting Econom. 36:337–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Hsu P-H, Li D (2013) Innovative efficiency and stock returns. J. Financial Econ. 107:632–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Hsu P-H, Li D (2018) Innovative originality, profitability, and stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 31:2553–2605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Lim SS, Teoh SH (2011) Limited investor attention and stock market misreactions to accounting information. Rev. Asset Pricing Stud. 1:35–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K, Karolyi GA, Kho BC (2011) What factors drive global stock returns? Rev. Financial Stud. 24:2527–2574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou K, Xue C, Zhang L (2015) Digesting anomalies: An investment approach. Rev. Financial Stud. 28:650–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu P-H, Li K, Liu Y, Wu H (2017) New product development and mergers and acquisitions. Working paper.Google Scholar
• Hutton AP, Marcus AJ, Tehranian H (2009) Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. J. Financial Econom. 94:67–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar A (2009) Hard-to-value stocks, behavioral biases, and informed trading. J. Financial Quantitative Anal. 44:1375–1401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landes WM, Posner RA (1987) Trademark law: An economic perspective. J. Law Econom. 30:265–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B (2001) Intangibles: Management, Measurement and Reporting (The Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Lev B, Sougiannis T (1996) The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 21:107–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B, Sarath B, Sougiannis T (2005) R&D reporting biases and their consequences. Contemporary Accounting Res. 22:977–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lou D (2014) Attracting investor attention through advertising. Rev. Financial Stud. 27:1797–1829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lou X, Shu T (2017) Price impact or trading volume: Why is the Amihud (2002) measure priced? Rev. Financial Stud. 30:4481–4520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrin M, Lee J, Allenby GM (2006) Determinants of trademark dilution. J. Consumer Res. 33(2):248–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nasirov S (2020) Trademark value indicators: Evidence from the trademark protection lifecycle in the US pharmaceutical industry. Res. Policy. 49(4):103929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A (1985) On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. J. Political Econom. 93:390–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng L (2005) Learning with information capacity constraints. J. Financial Quantitative Anal. 40:307–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng L, Xiong W (2003) Time to digest and volatility dynamics. Working paper, City University of New York and Princeton University.Google Scholar
• Peng L, Xiong W (2006) Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. J. Financial Econom. 80(3):563–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penman SH, Zhang XJ (2002) Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. Accounting Rev. 77(2):237–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters RH, Taylor LA (2017) Intangible capital and the investment-q relation. J. Financial Econom. 123:251–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson RA, Smith KH, Zerrillo PC (1999) Trademark dilution and the practice of marketing. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 27:255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roe JM (2008) The current state of antidilution law: The trademark dilution revision act and the identical mark presumption. De Paul Law Rev. 57:571.Google Scholar
• Sandner PG, Block J (2011) The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. Res. Policy 40:969–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• So EC (2013) A new approach to predicting analyst forecast errors: Do investors overweight analyst forecasts? J. Financial Econom. 108:615–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stambaugh RF, Yuan Y (2017) Mispricing factors. Rev. Financial Stud. 30:1270–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teoh SH, Wong TJ (2002) Why new issues and high-accrual firms underperform: The role of analysts’ credulity. Rev. Financial Stud. 15:869–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vitorino MA (2013) Understanding the effect of advertising on stock returns and firm value: Theory and evidence from a structural model. Management Sci. 60:227–245.Link, Google Scholar
• You H, Zhang XJ (2009) Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information. Rev. Accounting Stud. 14(4):559–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2005) The value premium. J. Finance 60:67–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang XF (2006) Information uncertainty and stock returns. J. Finance 61:105–137.Crossref, Google Scholar