Employee Responses to Compensation Changes: Evidence from a Sales Firm

References

• Aldatmaz S, Ouimet P, Van Wesep E (2018) The option to quit: The effect of employee stock options on turnover J. Financial Econom. 127(1):136–151.Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter O, Heckman J (1974) The estimation of income and substitution effects in a model of family labor supply. Econometrica 42(1):73–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel AP, Borjas GJ (1981) Wage Growth and Job Turnover: An Empirical Analysis. Studies in Labor Markets (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bartel A, Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2004) Using “insider econometrics” to study productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):217–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bewley TF (1998) Why not cut pay? Eur. Econom. Rev. 42(3-5):459–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burdett K, Mortensen D (1998) Wage differentials, employer size, and unemployment. Internat. Econom. Rev. 39(2):257–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell CM III, Kamlani KS (1997) The reasons for wage rigidity: Evidence from a survey of firms. Quart. J. Econom. 112(3):759–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Agarwal R, Campbell BA (2012) Heterogeneity in turnover: The effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers. Strategic Management J. 33(12):1411–1430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cengiz D, Dube A, Lindner A, Zipperer B (2019) The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs. Quart. J. Econom. 134(3):1405–1454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen DL, Horton JJ (2016) Research note–are online labor markets spot markets for tasks? A field experiment on the behavioral response to wage cuts. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):403–423.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Goette L (2014a) Fair wages and effort provision: Combining evidence from a choice experiment and a field experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1777–1794.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Herrmann B, Schneider F (2014b) Social comparison and effort provision: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):877–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U, Rao G (2016) Estimating social preferences and gift exchange at work. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickson A, Fongoni M (2019) Asymmetric reference-dependent reciprocity, downward wage rigidity, and the employment contract J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 163:409–429.Google Scholar
• Dube A, Giuliano L, Leonard J (2018) Fairness and frictions: The impact of unequal raises on quit behavior. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englmaier F, Roider A, Sunde U (2017) The role of communication of performance schemes: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 63(12):4061–4080.Link, Google Scholar
• Esteves-Sorenson C (2018) Gift exchange in the workplace: Addressing the conflicting evidence with a careful test. Management Sci. 64(9):4365–4388Link, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Falk A (1999) Wage rigidity in a competitive incomplete contract market. J. Political Econom. 107(1):106–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Goette L, Zehnder C (2009) A behavioral account of the labor market: The role of fairness concerns. Annual Rev. Econom. 1(1):355–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowlie M, Greenstone M, Wolfram C (2018) Do energy efficiency investments deliver? Evidence from the weatherization assistance program. Quart. J. Econom. 133(3):1597–1644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giacalone RA, Greenberg J (1997) Antisocial Behavior in Organizations (Sage, New York).Google Scholar
• Greenberg J (1990) Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. J. Appl. Psychol. 75(5):561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee LE, Nanda A (2008) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Sci. 54(7):1213–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2018) Doing well by making well: The impact of corporate wellness programs on employee productivity. Management Sci. 64(11):4967–4987.Link, Google Scholar
• Hölmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn S (1997) Evidence of nominal wage stickiness from microdata. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(5):993–1008.Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(4):728–741.Google Scholar
• Krueger M, Friebel G (2018) A pay change and its long-term consequences. Technical report, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn.Google Scholar
• Krueger AB, Mas A (2004) Strikes, scabs, and tread separations: Labor strife and the production of defective bridgestone/firestone tires. J. Political Econom. 112(2):253–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2013) Do wage cuts damage work morale? Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(4):853–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Leider S (2012) Incentive schemes, sorting, and behavioral biases of employees: Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 4(2):184–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larkin I, Pierce L, Gino F (2012) The psychological costs of pay-for-performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1194–1214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL, Stanton CT (2015) The value of bosses. J. Labor Econom. 33(4):823–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP, Shaw KL, Stanton C (2016) Making do with less: Working harder during recessions. J. Labor Econom. 34(S1):S333–S360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemieux T, MacLeod WB, Parent D (2009) Performance pay and wage inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 124(1):1–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon JG, Webb MD (2018) The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters. Econometrics J. 21(2):114–135.Google Scholar
• Manning A (2003) Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A (2006) Pay, reference points, and police performance. Quart. J. Econom. 121(3):783–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas B, Aaker DA (1989) Strategy over the business cycle. Strategic Management J. 10(3):199–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Sengul M (2012) Incentive life-cycles: Learning and the division of value in firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):305–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Zenger T (2017) Organization design, proximity, and productivity responses to upward social comparison. Organ. Sci. 28(1):1–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (2004) Why do firms use incentives that have no incentive effects? J. Finance 59(4):1619–1650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P, Schaefer S (2005) Why do some firms give stock options to all employees?: An empirical examination of alternative theories. J. Financial Econom. 76(1):99–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandvik JJ, Saouma RE, Seegert NT, Stanton CT (2020) Workplace knowledge flows. Quart. J. Econom. 135(3):1635–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stafford TM (2015) What do fishermen tell us that taxi drivers do not? An empirical investigation of labor supply. J. Labor Econom. 33(3):683–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR (1992) Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(2):198–219.Crossref, Google Scholar