Penalty or Reward? The Effect of Social Disincentives on Online Users’ Contributions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.01115

References

  • Ailawadi KL, Neslin SA (1998) The effect of promotion on consumption: Buying more and consuming it faster. J. Marketing Res. 35(3):390–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amsel A (1967) Partial reinforcement effects on vigor and persistence. Advances in frustration theory derived from a variety of within-subjects experiments. Psych. Learn. Motivation Adv. Res. Theory 1:1–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. (London) 100(401):464–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreoni J, Harbaugh W, Vesterlund L (2003) The carrot or the stick: Rewards, punishments, and cooperation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):893–902.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A, Cervone D (1983) Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(5):1017–1028.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barclay P (2004) Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons.” Evolution Human Behav. 25(4):209–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barclay P (2010) Harnessing the power of reputation: Strengths and limits for promoting cooperative behaviors. Evolution Psych. 10(5):868–883.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berlyne D (1970) Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perceptive Psychophys. 8(5):279–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharyya S, Banerjee S, Bose I, Kankanhalli A (2020) Temporal effects of repeated recognition and lack of recognition on online community contributions. J. Management Inform. Systems 37(2):536–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bochet O, Page T, Putterman L (2006) Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60(1):11–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J, Houser R, Birnbaum G, Lloyd K, Deitcher J, Nathanson S, Rubin JZ (1986) Escalation of commitment to an ineffective course of action: The effect of feedback having negative implications for self-identity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin RE, Gupta S (1992) Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: An integrated modeling approach. J. Marketing Res. 29(2):201–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2015) What are social incentives worth? A randomized field experiment in user content generation. 2015 Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems: Exploring Inform. Frontier, ICIS 2015 (Association for Information Systems, Fort Worth, TX).Google Scholar
  • Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell WK, Sedikides C (1999) Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Rev. General Psych. 3(1):23–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter JP (2007) The demand for punishment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 62(4):522–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carver C, Scheier M (2001) On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chen W, Wei X, Zhu KX (2018) Engaging voluntary contributions in online communities: A hidden Markov model. MIS Quart. 42(1):83–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Xu H, Whinston AB (2011) Moderated online communities and quality of user-generated content. J. Management Inform. Systems 28(2):237–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on MovieLens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cho D, Kwon KH (2015) The impacts of identity verification and disclosure of social cues on flaming in online user comments. Comput. Human Behav. 51:363–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi K, Lee D, Olson DL (2015) Service quality and productivity in the US airline industry: A service quality-adjusted DEA model. Service Bus. 9(1):137–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chua AYK, Banerjee S (2016) Helpfulness of user-generated reviews as a function of review sentiment, product type and information quality. Comput. Human Behav. 54:547–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman M, Liau TL (1975) A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. J. Appl. Psych. 60(2):283–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crocker J, Park LE (2004) The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psych. Bull. 130(3):392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cross SE, Markus HR (1999) The cultural constitution of personality. Pervin LA, John OP, eds. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (Guilford Press, New York), 378–396.Google Scholar
  • Dana J, Weber RA, Kuang JX (2007) Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Econom. Theory 33(1):67–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T, Beck J (2001) The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL (1972) Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 22(1):113–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dittus M, Capra L (2017) Private Peer Feedback as Engagement Driver in Humanitarian Mapping (ACM, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunn EW, Aknin LB, Norton MI (2014) Prosocial spending and happiness: Using money to benefit others pays off. Current Directive Psych. Sci. 23(1):41–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durbin J, Koopman SJ (2012) Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods, vol. 38 (OUP, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbach A, Eyal T, Finkelstein SR (2010) How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 4(8):517–530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fixler D, Zieschang KD (1992) Incorporating ancillary measures of process and quality change into a superlative productivity index. J. Production Anal. 2(4):245–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Friesner DL (2003) An empirical examination of cost-adjusting in outpatient clinics. J. Socio-Econom. 31(6):745–759.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garland EL, Fredrickson B, Kring AM, Johnson DP, Meyer PS, Penn DL (2010) Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clinical Psych. Rev. 30(7):849–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert P, Allan S (1998) The role of defeat and entrapment (arrested flight) in depression: An exploration of an evolutionary view. Psych. Medicine 28(3):585–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goes PB, Guo C, Lin M (2016) Do incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):497–516.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W (2004) The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. Econom. J. 7(1):98–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guitart IA, Stremersch S (2021) The impact of informational and emotional television ad content on online search and sales. J. Marketing Res. 58(2):299–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S (1988) Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. 25(4):342–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hashim M, Bockstedt J (2021) Overcoming free-riding in user-generated content platforms: Punishments and rewards for individuals and groups. Working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
  • Hashim MJ, Kannan KN, Maximiano S (2017) Information feedback, targeting, and coordination: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):289–308.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hendel I, Nevo A (2006) Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica 74(6):1637–1673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang N, Carey WP, Burtch G, Gu B, Hong Y, Liang C, Wang K, et al. (2019) Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Sci. 65(1):327–345.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ilies R, Judge TA (2005) Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. J. Appl. Psych. 90(3):453–467.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jabr W, Mookerjee R, Yong T, Mookerjee VS, Tan Y, Mookerjee VS (2014) Leveraging philanthropic behavior for customer support: The case of user support forums. MIS Quart. 38(1):187–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones EE, Pittman TS (1982) Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. Suls J, ed. Psychological Perspectives on the Self, vol. 1 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), 231–262.Google Scholar
  • Jung M, Ryu S, Han SP, Cho D (2023) Ask for reviews at the right time: Evidence from two field experiments. J. Marketing 87(4):528–549.Google Scholar
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khairova N, Kolesnyk A, Mamyrbayev O, Mukhsina K (2019) The influence of various text characteristics on the readability and content informativeness. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. Enterprise Inform. Systems (Heraklion, Crete, Greece), 462–469.Google Scholar
  • Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BSB (1975) Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Report RBR-8-75, Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch, Millington, TN.Google Scholar
  • Korfiatis N, García-Bariocanal E, Sánchez-Alonso S (2012) Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 11(3):205–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani KR, von Hippel E (2003) How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy 32(6):923–943.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampe C, Johnston E (2005) Follow the (slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. Proc. 2005 ACM Internat. Conf. Supporting Group Work (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 11–20.Google Scholar
  • Lamont M (2000) The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Y, Shankar V (2015) The dynamic impact of product-harm crises on brand preference and advertising effectiveness: An empirical analysis of the automobile industry. Management Sci. 61(10):2514–2535.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu X, Schuckert M, Law R (2016) Online incentive hierarchies, review extremity, and review quality: Empirical evidence from the hotel sector. J. Travel Tourism Marketing 33(3):279–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • London M (2003) Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement, 2nd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lutz B, Pröllochs N, Neumann D (2022) Are longer reviews always more helpful? Disentangling the interplay between review length and line of argumentation. J. Bus. Res. 144:888–901.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McConnell B, Huba J (2006) The 1% rule: Charting citizen participation. Church of the Customer Blog (May 3), https://web.archive.org/web/20100511081141/http://www.churchofthecustomer.com/blog/2006/05/charting_wiki_p.html.Google Scholar
  • McLaughlin HG (1969) SMOG grading: A new readability formula. J. Reading 12(8):639–646.Google Scholar
  • Melumad S, Meyer R, Kim YD (2021) The dynamics of distortion: How successive summarization alters the retelling of news. J. Marketing Res. 58(6):1058–1078.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moon JY, Sproull LS (2008) The role of feedback in managing the Internet-based volunteer work force. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):494–515.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moqri M, Mei X, Qiu L, Bandyopadhyay S (2018) Effect of “following” on contributions to open source communities. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(4):1188–1217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naik PA, Mantrala MK, Sawyer AG (1998) Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. 17(3):181–295.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nepon T, Flett GL, Hewitt PL, Molnar DS (2011) Perfectionism, negative social feedback, and interpersonal rumination in depression and social anxiety. Canadian J. Behav. Sci. 43(4):297–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nerlove M, Arrow KJ (1962) Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica 29(114):129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nikiforakis N (2008) Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves? J. Public Econom. 92(1–2):91–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nolan SA, Flynn C, Garber J (2003) Prospective relations between rejection and depression in young adolescents. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(4):745–755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrom E, Walker J, Gardner R (1992) Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 86(2):404–417.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park S, Gupta S (2012) Handling endogenous regressors by joint estimation using copulas. Marketing Sci. 31(4):567–586.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff PM, Farh JL (1986) Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance: A preliminary test of some control theory propositions. Acad. Management Proc. 1986(1):198–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ponzanelli L, Mocci A, Bacchelli A, Lanza M, Fullerton D (2014) Improving low quality stack overflow post detection. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Software Maintenance Evolution (IEEE, New York), 541–544.Google Scholar
  • Price J, Sloman L, Gardner R, Gilbert P, Rohde P (1994) The social competition hypothesis of depression. British J. Psychiatry 164(3):309–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts G (1998) Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B Biological Sci. 265(1394):427–431.Google Scholar
  • Ryan R, Deci E (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. Amer. Psych. 55(1):68–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 36(4):387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scalabrino S, Linares-Vasquez M, Poshyvanyk D, Oliveto R (2016) Improving code readability models with textual features. IEEE 24th Internat. Conf. Program Comprehension (IEEE Computer Society, New York), 1–10.Google Scholar
  • Scheepers D, Ellemers N (2005) When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 41(2):192–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz A, Miehl C, Berry MJ II, Gjorgjieva J (2021) The generation of cortical novelty responses through inhibitory plasticity. eLife 10:e65309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sefton M, Shupp R, Walker JM (2007) The effect of rewards and sanctions in provision of public goods. Econom. Inquiry 45(4):671–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shanab ME, Peterson D, Dargahi S, Deroian P (1981) The effects of positive and negative verbal feedback on the intrinsic motivation of male and female subjects. J. Soc. Psych. 115(2):195–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shang J, Croson R (2006) The impact of social comparisons on nonprofit fund raising. Isaac RM, Davis DD, eds. Experiments Investigating Fundraising and Charitable Contributors, Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 11 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 143–156.Google Scholar
  • Shen W, Hu YJ, Rees Ulmer J (2015) Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers’ strategic behavior. MIS Quart. 39(3):683–696.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stadtfeld C, Vörös A, Elmer T, Boda Z, Raabe IJ (2019) Integration in emerging social networks explains academic failure and success. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(3):792–797.Google Scholar
  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20(4):518–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swann WB (1983) Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. Suls J, Greenwald AG, eds. Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self, vol. 2 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York), 33–66.Google Scholar
  • Sylwester K, Roberts G (2010) Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games. Biology Lett. 6(5):659–662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tang Q, Gu B, Whinston AB (2012) Content contribution for revenue sharing and reputation in social media: A dynamic structural model. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(2):41–76.Google Scholar
  • Tangney JP (1999) The self-conscious emotions: Shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride. Dalgleish T, Power MJ, eds. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 541–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanizaki H (1993) Kalman filter model with qualitative dependent variables. Rev. Econom. Statist. 75(4):747–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Train KE (1986) Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics and Application to Automobile Demand (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Train KE (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vance RJ, Colella A (1990) Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. J. Appl. Psych. 75(1):68–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (1999) Markets for Information Goods, vol. 99 (Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, Tokyo).Google Scholar
  • Walker JM, Halloran MA (2004) Rewards and sanctions and the provision of public goods in one-shot settings. Experiment. Econom. 7(3):235–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasko MM, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. 29(1):35–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiner B (1974) Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory (General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Weise E (2017) That review you wrote on Amazon? Priceless. USA Today (March 20), https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/03/20/review-you-wrote-amazon-priceless/99332602/.Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2015) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (Nelson Education, Toronto).Google Scholar
  • Zamanian M, Heydari P (2012) Readability of texts: State of the art. Theory Practice Language Stud. 2(1):43–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng X, Diaz I, Jing Y, Chiaburu DS (2015) Positive and negative supervisor developmental feedback and task-performance. Leadership Organ. Development J. 36(2):212–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.