The Bad Thing About Good Advice: Understanding When and How Advice Exacerbates Overconfidence
Published Online:28 Jul 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.3987
References
- (2020) Advisors want their advice to be used–but not too much: An interpersonal perspective on advice taking. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 89:103979.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Memory Language 59(4):390–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114(26):E5070–E5076.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 101(2):127–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Smart people ask for (my) advice: Seeking advice boosts perceptions of competence. Management Sci. 61(6):1421–1435.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Aggregation of opinions based on correlated cues and advisors. J. Behav. Decision Making 20(2):153–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(4):557–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res. 33(2):261–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. Internat. J. Forecasting 5(4):559–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Local regression models. Chambers JM, Hastie TJ, eds. Statistical Models in S (Chapman & Hall, New York), 309–376.Google Scholar
- (2004) The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psych. Bull. 130(6):959–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Hit or miss: What leads experts to take advice for long-term judgments? Management Sci. 62(7):2002–2021.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Simple vs. complex forecasting: The evidence. J. Bus. Res. 68(8):1678–1685.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 70(2):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Interaction with others increases decision confidence but not decision quality: Evidence against information collection views of interactive decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 61(3):305–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Seeking advice: A sampling approach to advice taking. Judgment Decision Making 11(4):401–415.Google Scholar
- (1994) Continuous Univariate Distributions, vol. 1 (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
- (2009) Lifespan adult faces: Norms for age, familiarity, memorability, mood, and picture quality. Experiment. Aging Res. 35(2):268–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Sci. 52(1):111–127.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) Social comparison and confidence: When thinking you’re better than average predicts overconfidence (and when it does not). Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 102(1):76–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The social psychology of the wisdom of crowds. Krueger JI, ed. Frontiers in Social Psychology: Social Judgment and Decision Making (Psychology Press, New York), 227–242.Google Scholar
- (1995) An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(5):877–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Psych. Sci. 25(5):1106–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behav. Res. Methods 36:630–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Two to tango: Effects of collaboration and disagreement on dyadic judgment. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(10):1325–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Overprecision in judgment. Gideon K, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Wiley, New York), 182–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self vs. others. Psych. Rev. 111(3):781–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).Google Scholar
- (2017) Advice as a form of social influence: Informational motives and the consequences for accuracy. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 11(8):e12329.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Pushing away from representative advice: Advice taking, anchoring, and adjustment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 130:26–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1961) Applied Statistical Decision Theory (Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston).Google Scholar
- (2013) Cheap talk and credibility: The consequences of confidence and accuracy on advisor credibility and persuasiveness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(2):246–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization. Judgment Decision Making 10(2):144–171.Google Scholar
- (2000) Biased information search in group decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 78(4):655–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 52(1):124–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 62(2):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 84(2):288–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, London).Google Scholar
- (2004) Overconfidence in interval estimates. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 30(2):299–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Strategies for revising judgment: How, and how well, do people use others’ opinions. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 35(3):780–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(2):260–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Spurious consensus and opinion revision: Why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments? J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition. 35(2):558–563.Crossref, Google Scholar

