Self-Interested Giving: The Relationship Between Conditional Gifts, Charitable Donations, and Donor Self-Interestedness

References

• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. (London) 100:464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99:544–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G, Degroot M, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9(3):226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beltramini R (2000) Exploring the effectiveness of business gifts: Replication and extension. J. Advertising 29(2):75–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biel A, Thøgerson J (2007) Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behavior. J. Econom. Psych. 28(1):93–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S (2008) Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine the moral sentiments: Evidence from economic experiments. Sci. 320:1605–1609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brainard D (1997) The Psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10(4):433–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown A, Meer J, Williams JF (2019) Why do people volunteer? An experimental analysis of preferences for time donations. Management Sci. 65(4):1455–1476.Link, Google Scholar
• Bushong B, King LM, Camerer C, Rangel A (2010) Pavlovian processes in consumer choice: The physical presence of a good increases willingness-to-pay. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1556–1571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Hogarth RM (1999) The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty 19:7–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Mobbs D (2017) Differences in behavior and brain activity in hypothetical and real choices. Trends Cognitive Sci. 21(1):46–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao M (2017) Demotivating incentives and motivation crowding out in charitable giving. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 114(28):7301–7306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao M (2018) Intentions-based reciprocity to monetary and non-monetary gifts. Games 9(4):74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao M, Chapman J (2020) Saving face through preference signaling and obligation avoidance. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 176:569–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crum A, Salovey P, Achor S (2013) Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(4):716–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E, Koestner R, Ryan R (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. 125(6):627–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donner A, Klar N (2000) Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research (Hodder Educational Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Dweck C (2008) Mindset: The New Psychology of Success (Ballantine Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Dweck C, Yeager D (2019) Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 14(3):481–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel CC, Herberich D, Meer J (2016). It’s not the thought that counts: A field experiment on gift exchange and giving at a public university. NBER Working Paper No. w22867, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2876432Google Scholar
• Engel C (2011) Dictator games: A meta study. Experiment. Econom. 14:583–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A (2007) Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica 75(5):1501–1511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Rangel A (2014) Symmetry in cold-to-hot and hot-to-cold valuation gaps. Psych. Sci. 25(1):120–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey B, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey B, Oberholzer-Gee F (1997) The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(4):746–755.Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115:791–810.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM (1999) Implementation intentions. Amer. Psych. 54:493–503.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green R, Lawyer S (2014) Steeper delay and probability discounting of potentially real vs. hypothetical cigarettes (but not money) among smokers. Behav. Processes 108:50–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyman J, Ariely D (2004) Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psych. Sci. 15(11):787–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes J, Miller D, Lerner M (2002) Committing altruism under the cloak of self-interest: The exchange fiction. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38(2):144–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler JB, Milkman KL, Zhang YC (2019) Getting the rich and powerful to give. Management Sci. 65(9):3949–4450.Google Scholar
• Kim JC, Wadhwa M, Chattopadhyay A (2019) When busy is less indulging: Impact of busy mindset on self-control behaviors. J. Consumer Res. 45(5):933–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Saluja G, Adaval R (2015) Who said what: The effects of cultural mindsets on perceptions of endorser-message relatedness. J. Consumer Psych. 25(3):389–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kutilek P (2016) 20 affordable ways to say thank you. GoFundMe. Accessed November 2, 2019, https://www.gofundme.com/c/blog/thank-you-to-donors.Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M (2010) Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: Field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 76(2):225–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Slonim R (2012) Will there be blood? Incentives and displacement effects in pro-social behavior. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 4(1):186–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landry C, Lange A, List J, Price M, Rupp N (2010) Is a donor in hand better than two in the bush? Evidence from a natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100:958–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lepper M, Greene D (1980) The Hidden Costs of Reward (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York).Google Scholar
• Lepper M, Greene D, Nisbett R (1973) Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 28(1):129–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman V, Samuels SM, Ross L (2004) The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations vs. situational labels in determining prisoner’s dilemma game moves. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 30(9):1175–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luce RD (1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Schmidt K (2017) You owe me. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(2):493–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellström C, Johannesson M (2008) Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(4):845–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DT (1999) The norm of self-interest. Amer. Psych. 54(12):1053–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niza C, Tung B, Marteau T (2013) Incentivizing blood donation: Systematic review and meta-analysis to test Titmuss’ hypotheses. Health Psych. 32(9):941–949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman G, Shen Y (2012) The counterintuitive effects of thank-you gifts on charitable giving. J. Econom. Psych. 33(5):973–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman G, Cain D (2014) Tainted altruism: When doing some good is evaluated as worse than doing no good at all. Psych. Sci. 25(3):648–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyserman D, Sorensen N, Reber R, Chen SX (2009) Connecting and separating mindsets: Culture as situated cognition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(2):217–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyserman D, Lee S (2008) Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psych. Bull. 134(2):311–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyserman D, Scott R, Kosslyn S, eds. (2015) Culture as situated cognition. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 318 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc), 1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saccardo S, Li CX, Samek A, Gneezy A (2020) Nudging generosity in consumer elective pricing. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 163:91–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ratner R, Zhao M, Clarke J (2011) The norm of self-interest: implications for charitable giving. Oppenheimer D, Olivola C, eds. The Science of Giving: Experimental Approaches to the Study of Charity (Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Saluja G, Adaval R, Wyer R Jr (2017) Hesitant to label, yet quick to judge: How cultural mindsets affect the accessibility of stereotypic knowledge when concepts of the elderly are primed. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes. 143:23–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savary J, Goldsmith K, Dhar R (2015) Giving against the odds: When tempting alternatives increase willingness to donate. J. Marketing Res. 52(1):27–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savary J, Li C, Newman G (2017) Exalted purchases or tainted donations? The effects of product incentives on charitable giving. Gneezy A, Griskevicius V, Williams P, eds. Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 45 (Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, MN), 238–242.Google Scholar
• Savary J, Li C, Newman G (2020) Exalted purchases or tainted donations? Self-signaling and the evaluation of charitable incentives. J. Consumer Psych. 30(4):671–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Irwin K, Lawrence P (2006) Does a ‘norm of self-interest’ discourage prosocial behavior? Rationality and quid pro quo in charitable giving. Soc. Psych. Quart. 69(3):296–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Gollwitzer P (1995) Effects of mindset on positive illusions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 69(2):213–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Xu A, Wyer R Jr (2008) The comparative mind-set: From animal comparisons to increased purchase intentions. Psych. Sci. 19(9):859–864.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warren C, Mcgraw AP, Van Boven L (2011) Values and preferences: defining preference construction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev. Cognitive Sci. 2(2):193–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhong C, Murnighan JK (2014) The social and ethical consequences of a calculative mindset. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 125:39–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Bank (2015) World Development Report 2015: Mind, Society, and Behavior (World Bank, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zlatev J, Miller D (2016) Self-interestedly benevolent or benevolently self-interested: When self-interest undermines vs. promotes prosocial behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137:112–122.Crossref, Google Scholar