How Do Peer Awards Motivate Creative Content? Experimental Evidence from Reddit

References

• Allan J, Wade C, Bolivar A (2003) Retrieval and novelty detection at the sentence level. Proc. 26th Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 314–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson NR, Gasteiger RM (2008) Innovation and creativity in organizations: Individual and work team research findings and implications for government policy. Nooteboom B, Stam E, eds. Micro-Foundations for Innovation Policy, vol. 18 (Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam), 249–271.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2013) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2017) Independent boards and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 123(3):536–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Stieglitz N (2014) Rewarding value‐creating ideas in organizations: The power of low‐powered incentives. Strategic Management J. 35(3):358–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2016) Secret admirers: An empirical examination of information hiding and contribution dynamics in online crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.Link, Google Scholar
• Cabral L, Li L (2015) A dollar for your thoughts: Feedback-conditional rebates on eBay. Management Sci. 61(9):2052–2063.Link, Google Scholar
• Carmel D, Roitman H, Yom-Tov E (2012) On the relationship between novelty and popularity of user-generated content. ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems Tech. 3(4):Article 69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Çelen B, Kariv S, Schotter A (2010) An experimental test of advice and social learning. Management Sci. 56(10):1687–1701.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen PY, Hong Y, Liu Y (2017) The value of multidimensional rating systems: Evidence from a natural experiment and randomized experiments. Management Sci. 64(10):4629–4647.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on Movielens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM, eds. (2002) Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of Self-Determination Research (University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY), 3–33.Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. 125(6):627–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Døjbak Håkonsson D, Eskildsen JK, Argote L, Mønster D, Burton RM, Obel B (2016) Exploration versus exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions. Strategic Management J. 37(6):985–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Armeli S (1997) Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(3):652–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Rhoades L (2001) Incremental effects of reward on creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(4):728–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Gallus J (2018) Volunteer organizations: Motivating with awards. Ranyard R, ed. Economic Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 275–286.Google Scholar
• Gallus J (2017) Fostering public good contributions with symbolic awards: A large-scale natural field experiment at Wikipedia. Management Sci. 63(12):3999–4015.Link, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Guo C, Lin M (2016) Do incentive hierarchies induce user effort? Evidence from an online knowledge exchange. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):497–516.Link, Google Scholar
• Hass RW (2017) Tracking the dynamics of divergent thinking via semantic distance: Analytic methods and theoretical implication. Memory Cognition 45(2):233–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmqvist M (2004) Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organ. Sci. 15(1):70–81.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Burtch G, Gu B, Hong Y, Liang C, Wang K, Fu D, Yang B (2019) Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Sci. 65(1):327–345.Link, Google Scholar
• Huberman BA, Romero DM, Wu F (2009) Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. J. Inform. Sci. 35(6):758–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hukal P, Henfridsson O, Shaikh M, Parker G (2020) Platform signaling for generating platform content. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 44(3):1177–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khern-am-nuai W, Kannan K, Ghasemkhani H (2018) Extrinsic versus intrinsic rewards for contributing reviews in an online platform. Inform. Systems Res. 29(4):871–892.Link, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 3(3):86–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuang L, Huang N, Hong Y, Yan Z (2019) Spillover effects of financial incentives on non-incentivized user engagement: Evidence from an online knowledge exchange platform. J. Management Inform. Systems 36(1):289–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakkaraju H, McAuley JJ, Leskovec J (2013) What’s in a name? Understanding the interplay between titles, content, and communities in social media. Proc. Seventh Internat. Conf. Web Soc. Media, 1(2).Google Scholar
• Lampel J, Shamsie J, Lant TK, eds. (2006) The Business of Culture: Strategic Perspectives on Entertainment and Media (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landauer TK, Dumais ST (1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psych. Rev. 104(2):211–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau J, Baldwin T (2016) An empirical evaluation of Doc2Vec with practical insights into document embedding generation. Proc. 1st Workshop Representation Learn. NLP (Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany), 78–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laureiro‐Martínez D, Brusoni S, Canessa N, Zollo M (2013) Understanding the exploration–exploitation dilemma: An fMRI study of attention control and decision‐making performance. Strategic Management J. 36(3):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Stettner U, Tushman ML (2010) Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):109–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence J, Park J, Budzynska K, Cardie C, Konat B, Reed C (2017) Using argumentative structure to interpret debates in online deliberative democracy and erulemaking. ACM Trans. Internet Tech. 17(3):Article 25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000a) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000b) The power of incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(2):410–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (JMLR.org, Beijing), 32(2):1188–1196.Google Scholar
• Lee S, Meyer-Doyle P (2017) How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from microdata. Organ. Sci. 28(1):19–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Leibbrandt A, Wang LC, Foo C (2017) Gender quotas, competitions, and peer review: Experimental evidence on the backlash against women. Management Sci. 64(8):3501–3516.Link, Google Scholar
• Malik MAR, Butt AN (2017) Rewards and creativity: Past, present, and future. Appl. Psych. 66(2):290–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• McKenzie PJ, Burkell J, Wong L, Whippey C, Trosow SE, McNally MB (2012) User-generated online content 1: Overview, current state and context. First Monday 17(6).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn J, Li L (2017) Giving gold: Understanding appreciation in Reddit communities. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Morgan M (1984) Reward-induced decrements and increments in intrinsic motivation. Rev. Ed. Res. 54(1):5–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perretti F, Negro G (2007) Mixing genres and matching people: A study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):563–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qiao D, Lee S-Y, Whinston A, Wei Q (2017) Overcoming the crowding-out effect of monetary incentive on pro-social behavior. Proc. 38th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Seoul).Google Scholar
• Ramirez C (2017) Three essays on non-monetary incentives and employee compensation. Unpublished dissertation, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Kraut R, Kiesler S (2007) Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3):377–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Restivo M, Van De Rijt A (2012) Experimental study of informal rewards in peer production. PLoS One 7(3):e34358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee M, Kim T (2014) Great vessels take a long time to mature: Early success traps and competences in exploitation and exploration. Organ. Sci. 26(1):180–197.Link, Google Scholar
• Robertson S (2004) Understanding inverse document frequency: On theoretical arguments for IDF. J. Documentation 60(5):503–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salton G, Buckley C (1988) Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inform. Processing Management 24(5):513–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soboroff I, Harman D (2005) Novelty detection: The TREC experience. Proc. Human Language Tech. Conf. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver), 105–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taggar S (2002) Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Acad. Management J. 45(2):315–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Muchnik L, Aral S (2019) What’s in a username? Identity cue effects in social media. Preprint, revised July 15, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2538130.Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Netzer O (2017) Idea generation, creativity, and prototypicality. Marketing Sci. 36(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Tsai FS, Tang W, Chan KL (2010) Evaluation of novelty metrics for sentence-level novelty mining. Inform. Sci. 180(12):2359–2374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang K, Dong B, Ma J (2019) Towards computational assessment of idea novelty. Proc. 52nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., Hawaii, 912–920.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wu F, Huberman BA (2007) Novelty and collective attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104(45):17599–17601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Zhu F (2018) Competition, contract, and creativity: Evidence from novel writing in a platform market. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Tang S, Raposo F, Chen L (2019) Deep cross-modal correlation learning for audio and lyrics in music retrieval. ACM Trans. Multimedia. Comput. Comm. Appl. 15(1):Article 20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J (1998) Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. J. Appl. Psych. 83(2):261–276.Crossref, Google Scholar