Nudging Drivers to Safety: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4063

References

  • Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(490):493–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2011) Synth: An R package for synthetic control methods in comparative case studies. J. Statist. Software 42(13):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9–10):1082–1095.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson A, Green EA (2018) Personal bests as reference points. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(8):1772–1776.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson A, Robinson DT (2017) Who feels the nudge? Knowledge, self-awareness and retirement savings decisions. Preprint, submitted August 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3021962.Google Scholar
  • Athey S, Tibshirani J, Wager S (2019) Generalized random forests. Ann. Statist. 47(2):1179–1203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A (2010) Self-efficacy. Weiner I, Craighead WE, eds. Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 1–3.Google Scholar
  • BBC (2014) When conventional road signs have no effect, designers are turning to increasingly clever ways to subconsciously make drivers slow down or pay attention. Accessed September 17, 2019, http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20140417-road-designs-that-trick-our-minds.Google Scholar
  • Bendoly E (2013) Real-time feedback and booking behavior in the hospitality industry: Moderating the balance between imperfect judgment and imperfect prescription. J. Oper. Management 31(1–2):62–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya J, Garber AM, Goldhaber-Fiebert J (2017) Nudges in exercise commitment contracts: A randomized trial. Preprint, submitted October 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048991.Google Scholar
  • Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burns EC, Martin AJ, Collie RJ (2019) Understanding the role of personal best (PB) goal setting in students’ declining engagement: A latent growth model. J. Ed. Psych. 111(4):557–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camilleri AR, Larrick RP (2014) Metric and scale design as choice architecture tools. J. Public Policy Marketing 33(1):108–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charlier C, Guerassimoff G, Kirakozian A, Selosse S (2021) Under pressure! Nudging electricity consumption within firms: Feedback from a field experiment. Energy J. 42(1):129–154.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Lu F, Zhang J (2017) Social comparisons, status and driving behavior. J. Public Econom. 155(C):11–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhary V, Shunko M, Netessine S (2020) Does immediate feedback make you not try as hard? A study on automotive telematics. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print December 28, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0924.Google Scholar
  • Cramer J, Krueger AB (2016) Disruptive change in the taxi business: The case of Uber. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 106(5):177–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cronqvist H, Thaler RH (2004) Design choices in privatized social-security systems: Learning from the Swedish experience. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(2):424–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Donohue K, Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2019) Behavioral operations: Past, present, and future. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(1):191–202.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Du N, Shelton S, Whittington R (2012) Does supplementing outcome feedback with performance feedback improve probability judgments? Internat. J. Financial Res. 3(4):19–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • FleetAnswers (2018) Strategies to Sustain Good Driving Behavior in the Long-Run (FleetAnswers). Accessed September 12, 2019, http://fleetanswers.com/content/strategies-sustain-good-driving-behavior-long-run-part-3.Google Scholar
  • Fredrickson BL, Kahneman D (1993) Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(1):45–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaker D, Zheng Y, Walker J (2010) Experimental economics in transportation: A focus on social influences and the provision of information. University of California Transportation Center, UC Berkley, Working Paper No. UCTC-FR-20.Google Scholar
  • Gill D, Prowse VL (2011) A novel computerized real effort task based on sliders. Preprint, submitted January 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1732324.Google Scholar
  • Habyarimana J, Jack W (2015) Results of a large-scale randomized behavior change intervention on road safety in Kenya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(34):E4661–E4670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helweg-Larsen M, Shepperd JA (2001) Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(1):74–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA, Chicken E (2013) Nonparametric Statistical Methods (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Ibanez MR, Staats BR (2018) Behavioral empirics and field experiments. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 121–147.Google Scholar
  • Kagan E, Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2018) Ideation – execution transition in product development: An experimental analysis. Management Sci. 64(5):2238–2262.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim SH, Tong J, Peden C (2020) Admission control biases in hospital unit capacity management: How occupancy information hurdles and decision noise impact utilization. Management Sci. 66(11):5151–5170.Google Scholar
  • Knechtle B, Wirth A, Knechtle P, Zimmermann K, Kohler G (2009) Personal best marathon performance is associated with performance in a 24-h run and not anthropometry or training volume. British J. Sports Medicine 43(11):836–839.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kremer M, Moritz B, Siemsen E (2011) Demand forecasting behavior: System neglect and change detection. Management Sci. 57(10):1827–1843.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance (Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lurie NH, Swaminathan JM (2009) Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):315–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marteau TM, Ogilvie D, Roland M, Suhrcke M, Kelly MP (2011) Judging nudging: Can nudging improve population health? BMJ 342(2011):d228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin AJ (2006) Personal bests (PBs): A proposed multidimensional model and empirical analysis. British J. Ed. Psych. 76(4):803–825.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • PennMedNews (2018) Penn and CHOP receive $1.84 million to study ways to curb cell phone use while driving. Retrieved October 2, 2019, https://bit.ly/2Ztn1Qm.Google Scholar
  • Rolim C, Baptista P, Duarte G, Farias T, Pereira J (2017) Impacts of real-time feedback on driving behaviour: A case-study of bus passenger drivers. Eur. J. Transport Infrastructure Res. 17(3):346–359.Google Scholar
  • Roy MM, Liersch MJ (2013) I am a better driver than you think: Examining self- enhancement for driving ability. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 43(8):1648–1659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shunko M, Niederhoff J, Rosokha Y (2018) Humans are not machines: The behavioral impact of queueing design on service time. Management Sci. 64(1):453–473.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Soleymanian M, Weinberg CB, Zhu T (2019) Sensor data and behavioral tracking: Does usage-based auto insurance benefit drivers? Marketing Sci. 38(1):21–43.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song H, Tucker AL, Murrell KL, Vinson DR (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Sci. 64(6):2628–2649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stillwater T, Kurani KS (2013) Drivers discuss ecodriving feedback: Goal setting, framing, and anchoring motivate new behaviors. Transportation Res. Part F: Traffic Psych. Behav. 19(2013):85–96.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunstein CR (2014) Nudging: A very short guide. J. Consumer Policy 37(4):583–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunstein CR (2017) Nudges that fail. Behav. Public Policy 1(1):4–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szaszi B, Palinkas A, Palfi B, Szollosi A, Aczel B (2018) A systematic scoping review of the choice architecture movement: Toward understanding when and why nudges work. J. Behav. Decision Making 31(3):355–366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor J, Wilson JC (2019) Using our understanding of time to increase self-efficacy toward goal achievement. Heliyon 5(8):e02116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tayur S (2017) OM forum: An essay on operations management. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 19(4):526–533.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tayur S, Kush J, Aven B (2019) Nudge(able): Field and experimental studies in organ donation. Working paper.Google Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Benartzi S (2004) Save More TomorrowTM: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Political Econom. 112(1):164–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • WHO (2018) Global status report on road safety 2018. Accessed September 16, 2019, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565684.Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Second (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Xu Y (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Anal. 25(1):57–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang N, Long Lim Y (2018) Temporary incentives change daily routines: Evidence from a field experiment on Singapore’s subways. Management Sci. 64(7):3365–3379.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yao WX, Fischman MG, Wang YT (1994) Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability. J. Motor Behav. 26(3):273–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zalech M, Bujak Z (2018) Precision of verbal feedback affects accuracy of motor skill performance. J. Sports Medicine Physical Fitness 58(4):435–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.