The Impact of Decision Rights on Innovation Sharing

References

• Becker-Peth M, Katok E, Thonemann UW (2013) Designing buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendors. Management Sci. 59(8):1800–1816.Link, Google Scholar
• Beer R, Ahn H-S, Leider S (2018) Can trustworthiness in a supply chain be signaled? Management Sci. 64(9):3974–3994.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F, Kök AG (2009) Dynamic cost reduction through process improvement in assembly networks. Management Sci. 55(4):552–567.Link, Google Scholar
• Bó PD (2005) Cooperation under the shadow of the future: experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(5):1591–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bó PD, Fréchette GR (2011) The evolution of cooperation in infinitely repeated games: Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E (2008) Learning by doing in the newsvendor problem: A laboratory investigation of the role of experience and feedback. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 10(3):519–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Charness G (2011) The strategy vs. the direct-response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):375–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brinkhoff A, Özer Ö, Sargut G (2015) All you need is trust? An examination of inter-organizational supply chain projects. Production Oper. Management 24(2):181–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt DN (1989) Managing suppliers up to speed. Harvard Bus. Rev. 67(4):127–135.Google Scholar
• Camera G, Casari M (2009) Cooperation among strangers under the shadow of the future. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):979–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craig N, DeHoratius N, Raman A (2016) The impact of supplier inventory service level on retailer demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 18(4):461–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Dal Bó P, Fréchette GR (2019) Strategy choice in the infinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(11):3929–3952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Hyndman K (2018) An experimental investigation of managing quality through monetary and relational incentives. Management Sci. 64(5):2345–2365.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1996) How Chrysler created an American keiretsu. Harvard Bus. Rev. (July/August), https://hbr.org/1996/07/how-chrysler-created-an-american-keiretsu.Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Hatch NW (2006) Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management J. 27(8):701–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engle-Warnick J, Slonim RL (2006) Inferring repeated-game strategies from actions: Evidence from trust game experiments. Econom. Theory 28(3):603–632. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Maskin E (1986) The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica 54(3):533–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (2005) Incentives between firms (and within). Management Sci. 51(1):2–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Nelson LD, Brown A (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989):325–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray JV, Roth AV, Tomlin B (2009) The influence of cost and quality priorities on the propensity to outsource production. Decision Sci. 40(4):697–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han S-L, Wilson DT, Dant SP (1993) Buyer-supplier relationships today. Indust. Marketing Management 22(4):331–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honhon D, Hyndman K (2020) Flexibility and reputation in repeated prisoner’s dilemma games. Management Sci. 66(11):4998–5014.Link, Google Scholar
• Hyndman K, Honhon D (2020) Flexibility in long-term relationships: An experimental study. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(2):273–291.Link, Google Scholar
• Hyndman K, Kraiselburd S, Watson N (2014) Coordination in games with strategic complementarities: An experiment on fixed vs. random matching. Production Oper. Management 23(2):221–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer AV, Schwarz LB, Zenios SA (2005) A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. 51(1):106–119.Link, Google Scholar
• Kalwani MU, Narayandas N (1995) Long-term manufacturer-supplier relationships: Do they pay off for supplier firms? J. Marketing 59(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Wu DY (2009) Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Sci. 55(12):1953–1968.Link, Google Scholar
• Katok E, Pavlov V (2013) Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. J. Oper. Management 31(3):129–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S-H, Netessine S (2013) Collaborative cost reduction and component procurement under information asymmetry. Management Sci. 59(1):189–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Klier TH, Rubenstein J (2006) The supplier industry in transition—the new geography of auto production. Chicago Fed Letter 229b, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Valdés L, Zheng Y (2018) Supply chain visibility and social responsibility: Investigating consumers’ behaviors and motives. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 20(4):617–636. Link, Google Scholar
• Krupka EL, Weber RA (2013) Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):495–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Debo LG (2009) Strategic dynamic sourcing from competing suppliers with transferable capacity investment. Naval Res. Logist. 56(6):540–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liker JK, Choi TY (2004) Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(12):104–113.Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Wu Y (2008) Social preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental study. Management Sci. 54(11):1835–1849.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy WS (2010) Bargaining chains (long version). Ross School of Business Paper 1146, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
• McMillan J (1990) Managing suppliers: Incentive systems in Japanese and US industry. Calif. Management Rev. 32(4):38–55. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monczka RM (2000) New Product Development: Strategies for Supplier Integration (ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI).Google Scholar
• Murnighan JK, Roth AE (1983) Expecting continued play in prisoner’s dilemma games a test of several models. J. Conflict Resolution 27(2):279–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman RG (1988) Single source qualification. J. Supply Chain Management 24(2):10–17.Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y (2016) Establishing trust and trustworthiness for supply chain information sharing. Ha A, Tang C, eds. Handbook of Information Exchange in Supply Chain Management, Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol. 5 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 287–312.Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Subramanian U, Wang Y (2016) Information sharing, advice provision, or delegation: What leads to higher trust and trustworthiness? Management Sci. 64(1):474–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Chen KY (2011) Trust in forecast information sharing. Management Sci. 57(6):1111–1137.Link, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Zheng Y, Ren Y (2014) Trust, trustworthiness, and information sharing in supply chains bridging China and the United States. Management Sci. 60(10):2435–2460.Link, Google Scholar
• Plante Moran (2020) Toyota sweeps supplier relations rankings in study; is “most preferred” customer. Accessed May 20, 2021, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/toyota-sweeps-supplier-relations-rankings-in-study-is-most-preferred-customer-301080323.html.Google Scholar
• Radner R (1985) Repeated principal-agent games with discounting. Econometrica 53(5):1173–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Murnighan JK (1978) Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoner’s dilemma. J. Math. Psych. 17(2):189–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudzki RA (2004) The advantages of partnering well. Supply Chain Management Rev. 8(2):44–51.Google Scholar
• Spiliotopoulou E, Donohue K, Gürbüz MÇ (2015) Information reliability in supply chains: The case of multiple retailers. Production Oper. Management 25(3):548–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stallkamp TT (2005) SCORE!: A Better Way to Do Busine$$: Moving from Conflict to Collaboration (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Swinney R, Netessine S (2009) Long-term contracts under the threat of supplier default. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(1):109–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor TA, Plambeck EL (2007) Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. Management Sci. 53(10):1577–1593.Link, Google Scholar