Proprietary Costs and Corporate Lobbying Against Changes in Mandatory Disclosure

References

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Special Committee on Financial Reporting (1994) Improving Business Reporting—a Customer Focus (AICPA, New York).Google Scholar
• Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR) (1993) Financial Reporting in the 1990s and Beyond: A Position Paper of the Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR, Charlottesville, VA).Google Scholar
• Baloria V, Marquardt C, Wiedman C (2017) A lobbying approach to evaluating the whistleblower provisions of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act of 2010. Contemporary Accounting Res. 34(3):1305–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsam S, Reitenga A, Yin J (2008) Option acceleration in response to SFAS No. 123(R). Accounting Horizons 22(1):23–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bens D, Berger P, Monahan S (2011) Discretionary disclosure in financial reporting: An examination comparing internal firm data to externally reported segment data. Accounting Rev. 86(2):417–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger P, Hann R (2002) Segment disclosure, proprietary costs, and the market for corporate control. Preprint, submitted December 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.357780.Google Scholar
• Berger P, Hann R (2003) The impact of SFAS No. 131 on information and monitoring. J. Accounting Res. 41(2):163–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger P, Hann R (2007) Segment profitability and the proprietary and agency costs of disclosure. Accounting Rev. 82(4):869–906.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger P, Choi J, Tomar S (2021) Breaking it down: Economic consequences of disaggregated cost disclosures. Preprint, submitted April 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3358435.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botosan C, Stanford M (2005) Managers’ motives to withhold segment disclosures and the effect of SFAS No. 131 on analysts’ information environment. Accounting Rev. 80(3):751–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botosan C, Huffman A, Stanford M (2021) The state of segment reporting by U.S. public entities: 1976–2017. Accounting Horizons 35(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho Y (2015) Segment disclosure transparency and internal capital market efficiency: Evidence from SFAS No. 131. J. Accounting Res. 53(4):669–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhary P, Rajgopal S, Venkatachalam M (2009) Accelerated vesting of employee stock options in anticipation of FAS 123-R. J. Accounting Res. 47(1):105–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darrough M, Stoughton N (1990) Financial disclosure policy in an entry game. J. Accounting Econom. 12(1–3):219–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deakin E (1989) Rational economic behavior and lobbying on accounting issues: Evidence from the oil and gas industry. Accounting Rev. 64(1):137–151.Google Scholar
• Dechow P, Hutton A, Sloan R (1996) Economic consequences of accounting for stock-based compensation. J. Accounting Res. 34(Supplement):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epstein M, Palepu K (1999) What financial analysts want. Strategic Finance 80(10):48–52.Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young (1998) Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information: FASB Statement 131 (Ernst & Young, New York).Google Scholar
• Ettredge M, Kwon S, Smith D (2002a) Competitive harm and companies’ positions on SFAS No. 131. J. Accounting Auditing Finance 17(2):93–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettredge M, Kwon S, Smith D (2002b) Security market effects associated with SFAS No. 131: Reported business segments. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting 18(4):323–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ettredge M, Kwon S, Smith D, Zarowin P (2005) The impact of SFAS No. 131 business segment data on the market’s ability to anticipate future earnings. Accounting Rev. 80(3):773–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1976) Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 14 (FASB, Norwalk, CT).Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1996) Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (Exposure Draft): Reporting Disaggregated Information About a Business Enterprise (FASB, Norwalk, CT).Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1997) Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 (FASB, Norwalk, CT).Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (2013) Standard-Setting Process (FASB, Norwalk, CT).Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (2020) Financial Performance Reporting—Disaggregation of Performance Information (FASB, Norwalk, CT).Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (2021) Segment Reporting (FASB, Norwalk, CT).Google Scholar
• Gipper B, Lombardi B, Skinner D (2013) The politics of accounting standard–setting: A review of empirical research. Australian J. Management 38(3):523–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray S, Roberts C (1989) Voluntary information disclosure and the British multinationals: Corporate perceptions of costs and benefits. Hopwood AG, ed. International Pressures for Accounting Change (Prentice Hall, London), 116–139.Google Scholar
• Grossman S (1981) The role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J. Law Econom. 24(3):461–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman S, Hart O (1980) Disclosure law and takeover bids. J. Finance 35(2):323–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M (1998) The association between competition and managers’ business segment reporting decisions. J. Accounting Res. 36(1):111–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes R, Lundholm R (1996) Segment reporting to the capital market in the presence of a competitor. J. Accounting Res. 34(2):261–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herrmann D, Thomas W (2000) An analysis of segment disclosures under SFAS No. 131 and SFAS No. 14. Accounting Horizons 14(3):287–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochberg Y, Sapienza P, Vissing-Jorgensen A (2009) A lobbying approach to evaluating the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. J. Accounting Res. 47(2):519–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodder L, Hopkins P (2014) Agency problems, accounting slack, and banks’ response to proposed reporting of loan fair values. Accounting Organ. Soc. 39(2):117–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang T, Khurana I, Wang C (2017) International diversification, SFAS 131 and post-earnings-announcement drift. Contemporary Accounting Res. 34(4):2152–2178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari S, Ramanna K, Skinner D (2010) Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. J. Accounting Econom. 50(2–3):246–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leone A, Minutti-Meza M, Wasley CE (2019) Influential observations and inference in accounting research. Accounting Rev. 94(6):337–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leuz C (2004) Proprietary vs. non-proprietary disclosures: Evidence from Germany. Leuz C, Pfaff D, Hopwood A, eds. The Economics and Politics of Accounting (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom), 164–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li F, Lundholm R, Minnis M (2013) A measure of competition based on 10-K filings. J. Accounting Res. 51(2):399–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo K (2003) Economic consequences of regulated changes in disclosure: The case of executive compensation. J. Accounting Econom. 35(3):285–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGregor J (2019) iPhone XS & Google Pixel 3 discounted before Galaxy S10 launch. Forbes (January 24), https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaymcgregor/2019/01/24/iphone-xs-google-pixel-3-discounted-before-galaxy-s10-launch/.Google Scholar
• Milgrom P (1981) Good news and bad news: Representation theorem and applications. Bell J. Econom. 12(2):380–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacter P (1993) Reporting disaggregated data. Research report, FASB, Norwalk, CT.Google Scholar
• Patatoukas P (2012) Customer-base concentration: Implications for firm performance and capital markets. Accounting Rev. 87(2):363–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramanna K (2008) The implications of unverifiable fair-value accounting: Evidence from the political economy of goodwill accounting. J. Accounting Econom. 45(2–3):253–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramanna K (2015) Political Standards: Corporate Interest, Ideology, and Leadership in the Shaping of Accounting Rules for the Market Economy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soliman M (2008) The use of DuPont analysis by market participants. Accounting Rev. 83(3):823–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Street D, Nichols N, Gray S (2000) Segment disclosures under SFAS No. 131: Has business segment reporting improved? Accounting Horizons 14(3):259–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verrecchia R (1983) Discretionary disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 5:179–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagenhofer A (1990) Voluntary disclosure with a strategic opponent. J. Accounting Econom. 12(4):341–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts R (1977) Corporate financial statements: A product of the market and political processes. Australian J. Management 2(1):53–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts R (2006) What has the invisible hand achieved? Accounting Bus. Res. 36(Sup1):51–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts R, Zimmerman J (1978) Toward a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Accounting Rev. 53(1):112–134.Google Scholar
• Watts R, Zimmerman J (1979) The demand for and supply of accounting theories: The market for excuses. Accounting Rev. 54(2):273–305.Google Scholar
• Watts R, Zimmerman J (1986) Positive Accounting Theory (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Watts R, Zimmerman J (1990) Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. Accounting Rev. 65(1):131–156.Google Scholar
• Zeff S (2002) Political “lobbying” on proposed standards: A challenge to the IASB. Accounting Horizons 16(1):43–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeff S (2005a) The evolution of U.S. GAAP: The political forces behind professional standards part 1. CPA J. 75(January):18–27.Google Scholar
• Zeff S (2005b) The evolution of U.S. GAAP: The political forces behind professional standards part 2. CPA J. 75(February):18–29.Google Scholar