Belief Updating Beyond the Two-State Setting

References

• Antoniou C, Harrison GW, Lau MI, Read D (2017) Information characteristics and errors in expectations: Experimental evidence. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 52(2):737–750.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1998) A model of investor sentiment. J. Financial Econom. 49(3):307–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barron K (2021) Belief updating: Does the “good-news, bad-news” asymmetry extend to purely financial domains? Experiment. Econom. 24(1):31–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beach L (1968) Probability magnitudes and conservative revision of subjective probabilities. J. Experiment. Psych. 77(1):57–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ (2019) Errors in probabilistic reasoning and judgment biases. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations, vol. 2 (Elsevier, New York), 69–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman C (1973) Prior probability bias in information seeking and opinion revision. Amer. J. Psych. 86(2):269–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cokely ET, Galesic M, Schulz E, Ghazal S, Garcia-Retamero R (2012) Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment Decision Making 7(1):25–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Titman S (2006) Market reactions to tangible and intangible information. J. Finance 61(4):1605–1643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danz D, Vesterlund L, Wilson AJ (2022) Belief elicitation and behavioral incentive compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(9):2851–2883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards W (1968) Conservatism in human information processing. Kleinmuntz B, ed. Formal Representation of Human Judgment (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 17–52.Google Scholar
• Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econom. Perspective 19(4):25–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frydman C, Jin LJ (2022) Efficient coding and risky choice. Quart. J. Econom. 137(1):161–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green PE, Halbert MH, Robinson PJ (1965) An experiment in probability estimation. J. Marketing Res. 2(3):266–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grether DM (1980) Bayes rule as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. Quart. J. Econom. 95(3):537–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grether DM (1992) Testing Bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: Some experimental evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 17(1):31–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin D, Tversky A (1992) The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psych. 24(3):411–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D (2001) Investor psychology and asset pricing. J. Finance 56(4):1533–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1972) Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psych. 3(3):430–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psych. Rev. 80(4):237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khaw MW, Li Z, Woodford M (2021) Cognitive imprecision and small-stakes risk aversion. Rev. Econom. Stud. 88(4):1979–2013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koehler JJ (1996) The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behav. Brain Sci. 19(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraemer C, Weber M (2004) How do people take into account weight, strength and quality of segregated vs. aggregated data? Experimental evidence. J. Risk Uncertainty 29(2):113–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang L (2003) Post–earnings announcement drift and market participants’ information processing biases. Rev. Accounting Stud. 8(2):321–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin DW (1969) Data conflict in a multinomial decision task. J. Experiment. Psych. 82(1):4–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin DW, Gettys C (1969) Feedback and response mode in performing a Bayesian decision task. J. Appl. Psych. 53(5):413–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Massey C, Simmons JP, Armor DA (2011) Hope over experience: Desirability and the persistence of optimism. Psych. Sci. 22(2):274–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson MW, Bloomfield R, Hales JW, Libby R (2001) The effect of information strength and weight on behavior in financial markets. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 86(2):168–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T (1998) Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average. J. Finance 53(6):1887–1934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson CR, Beach LR (1967) Man as an intuitive statistician. Psych. Bull. 68(1):29–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson CR, Swensson RG (1968) Intuitive statistical inferences about diffuse hypotheses. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 3(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peterson CR, DuCharme WM, Edwards W (1968) Sampling distributions and probability revisions. J. Experiment. Psych. 76(2):236–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips LD, Hays WL, Edwards W (1966) Conservatism in complex probabilistic inference. IEEE Trans. Human Factors Electronics 7(1):7–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitz GF (1967) Sample size, likelihood, and confidence in a decision. Psychonomic Sci. 8(6):257–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders A (1968) Choice among bets and revision of opinion. Acta Psych. (Amsterdam) 28:76–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schum DA (1966) Prior uncertainty and amount of diagnostic evidence as variables in a probabilistic inference task. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 1(1):31–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorescu S, Subrahmanyam A (2006) The cross section of analyst recommendations. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 41(1):139–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welsh MB, Navarro DJ (2012) Seeing is believing: Priors, trust, and base rate neglect. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 119(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar