Identity, Diversity, and Team Performance: Evidence from U.S. Mutual Funds
References
- (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94:291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Director skill sets. J. Financial Econom. 130:641–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127:137–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115:715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econom. Perspective 19:9–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Identity, supervision, and work groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98:212–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62:777–795.Google Scholar
- (2020) Importing political polarization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110:3139–3183.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Do CEOs affect employees’ political choices? Rev. Financial Stud. 33:1781–1817.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Is a team different from the sum of its parts? Evidence from mutual fund managers. Rev. Finance 15:359–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Identity, morals, and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quart. J. Econom. 126(2):805–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. J. Financial Econom. 127:588–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Conflicting family values in mutual fund families. J. Finance 68:173–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Performance characteristics of individually-managed vs. team-managed mutual funds. J. Portfolio Management 34:110–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Is the internet causing political polarization? Evidence from demographics. NBER Working Paper No. 23258, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (1971) The Attraction Paradigm, vol. 11 (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
- (2020) Social identity, group behavior, and teams. Annu. Rev. Econom. 12:691–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Individual behavior and group membership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97:1340–1352.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:2562–2589.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94:1276–1302.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games Econom. Behav. 84:58–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Are some mutual fund managers better than others? Cross-sectional patterns in behavior and performance. J. Finance 54:875–899.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 120:1625–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. J. Political Econom. 116:951–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) How active is your fund manager? A new measure that predicts performance. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:3329–3365.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Benchmark discrepancies and mutual fund performance evaluation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 57:543–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Task vs. relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88:741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 111:158–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Managing diversity by creating team identity. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58:371–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:229–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Competition and cooperation in mutual fund families. J. Financial Econom. 136:168–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Board ancestral diversity and firm-performance volatility. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 54:1117–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Discrimination as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Evidence from French grocery stores. Quart. J. Econom. 132:1219–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1976) Information and competitive price systems. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66:246–253.Google Scholar
- (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9:193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111:465–497.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Ethnic divisions and production in firms. Quart. J. Econom. 129:1899–1946.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13:324–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Red and blue investing: Values and finance. J. Financial Econom. 103:1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Problem solving by heterogeneous agents. J. Econom. Theory 97:123–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Corporate policies of Republican managers. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 49:1279–1310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59:690–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quart. 76:405–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100:801–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106:267–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The influence of competing identity primes on political preferences. J. Politics 75:1108–1124.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Identity economics 2016: Where do social distinctions and norms come from? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106:405–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Deconstructing bias in social preferences reveals groupy and not-groupy behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117:21185–21193.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Globalisation and the market for team-mates. Econom. J. (London) 109:C15–C40.Google Scholar
- (2014) Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors. J. Financial Econom. 112:232–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The rise of uncivil agreement: Issue vs. behavioral polarization in the american electorate. Amer. Behav. Sci. 57:140–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59:128–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2006) The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. J. Politics 68:140–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Sex matters: Gender bias in the mutual fund industry. Management Sci. 65:3001–3025.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) To group or not to group? Evidence from mutual fund databases. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 52:1989–2021.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center (2020) Wide gender gap, growing educational divide in voters’ party identification. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2008) How does size affect mutual fund behavior? J. Finance 63:2941–2969.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Do shocks to personal wealth affect risk-taking in delegated portfolios? Rev. Financial Stud. 32:1457–1493.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Are n+1 heads better than one? The case of mutual fund managers. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 47:103–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Teams take the better risks. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63:412–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Partyism. University Chicago Legal Forum 2015(1):23–32.Google Scholar
- (2015) Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspective Psych. Sci. 10:145–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The tie that divides: Cross-national evidence of the primacy of partyism. Eur. J. Political Res. 57:333–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Acad. Management J. 36:996–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Partisan bias in fund portfolios. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 55(5):1717–1754.Crossref, Google Scholar

