Identity, Diversity, and Team Performance: Evidence from U.S. Mutual Funds

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00544

References

  • Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financial Econom. 94:291–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adams RB, Akyol AC, Verwijmeren P (2018) Director skill sets. J. Financial Econom. 130:641–662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahern KR, Dittmar AK (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127:137–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115:715–753.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2005) Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econom. Perspective 19:9–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2008) Identity, supervision, and work groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98:212–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62:777–795.Google Scholar
  • Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G, Majlesi K (2020) Importing political polarization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110:3139–3183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babenko I, Fedaseyeu V, Zhang S (2020) Do CEOs affect employees’ political choices? Rev. Financial Stud. 33:1781–1817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bar M, Kempf A, Ruenzi S (2011) Is a team different from the sum of its parts? Evidence from mutual fund managers. Rev. Finance 15:359–396.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2011) Identity, morals, and taboos: Beliefs as assets. Quart. J. Econom. 126(2):805–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernile G, Bhagwat V, Yonker S (2018) Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. J. Financial Econom. 127:588–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya U, Lee JH, Pool VK (2013) Conflicting family values in mutual fund families. J. Finance 68:173–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bliss RT, Potter ME, Schwarz C (2008) Performance characteristics of individually-managed vs. team-managed mutual funds. J. Portfolio Management 34:110–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boxell L, Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM (2017) Is the internet causing political polarization? Evidence from demographics. NBER Working Paper No. 23258, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Byrne DE (1971) The Attraction Paradigm, vol. 11 (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Charness G, Chen Y (2020) Social identity, group behavior, and teams. Annu. Rev. Econom. 12:691–713.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Rigotti L, Rustichini A (2007) Individual behavior and group membership. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97:1340–1352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen R, Chen Y (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101:2562–2589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Hong H, Huang M, Kubik JD (2004) Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94:1276–1302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Li SX, Liu TX, Shih M (2014) Which hat to wear? Impact of natural identities on coordination and cooperation. Games Econom. Behav. 84:58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier J, Ellison G (1999) Are some mutual fund managers better than others? Cross-sectional patterns in behavior and performance. J. Finance 54:875–899.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 120:1625–1660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C (2008) The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. J. Political Econom. 116:951–979.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cremers KJM, Petajisto A (2009) How active is your fund manager? A new measure that predicts performance. Rev. Financial Stud. 22:3329–3365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cremers KM, Fulkerson JA, Riley TB (2022) Benchmark discrepancies and mutual fund performance evaluation. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 57:543–571.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR (2003) Task vs. relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88:741–749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di Giuli A, Kostovetsky L (2014) Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. J. Financial Econom. 111:158–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2005) Managing diversity by creating team identity. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58:371–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:229–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans RB, Prado MP, Zambrana R (2020) Competition and cooperation in mutual fund families. J. Financial Econom. 136:168–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giannetti M, Zhao M (2019) Board ancestral diversity and firm-performance volatility. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 54:1117–1155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glover D, Pallais A, Pariente W (2017) Discrimination as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Evidence from French grocery stores. Quart. J. Econom. 132:1219–1260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman SJ, Stiglitz JE (1976) Information and competitive price systems. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66:246–253.Google Scholar
  • Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9:193–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton BH, Nickerson JA, Owan H (2003) Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. J. Political Econom. 111:465–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hjort J (2014) Ethnic divisions and production in firms. Quart. J. Econom. 129:1899–1946.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. 13:324–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong H, Kostovetsky L (2012) Red and blue investing: Values and finance. J. Financial Econom. 103:1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong L, Page SE (2001) Problem solving by heterogeneous agents. J. Econom. Theory 97:123–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutton I, Jiang D, Kumar A (2014) Corporate policies of Republican managers. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 49:1279–1310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar S, Westwood SJ (2015) Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59:690–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar S, Sood G, Lelkes Y (2012) Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quart. 76:405–431.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44:741–763.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kandel E, Lazear E (1992) Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Political Econom. 100:801–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim D, Starks LT (2016) Gender diversity on corporate boards: Do women contribute unique skills? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106:267–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klar S (2013) The influence of competing identity primes on political preferences. J. Politics 75:1108–1124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kranton RE (2016) Identity economics 2016: Where do social distinctions and norms come from? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106:405–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kranton R, Pease M, Sanders S, Huettel S (2020) Deconstructing bias in social preferences reveals groupy and not-groupy behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117:21185–21193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear EP (1999) Globalisation and the market for team-mates. Econom. J. (London) 109:C15–C40.Google Scholar
  • Lee J, Lee KJ, Nagarajan NJ (2014) Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors. J. Financial Econom. 112:232–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason L (2013) The rise of uncivil agreement: Issue vs. behavioral polarization in the american electorate. Amer. Behav. Sci. 57:140–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason L (2015) “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59:128–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCarty N, Poole KT, Rosenthal H (2006) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Mutz DC, Mondak JJ (2006) The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. J. Politics 68:140–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niessen-Ruenzi A, Ruenzi S (2019) Sex matters: Gender bias in the mutual fund industry. Management Sci. 65:3001–3025.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Patel S, Sarkissian S (2017) To group or not to group? Evidence from mutual fund databases. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 52:1989–2021.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pew Research Center (2020) Wide gender gap, growing educational divide in voters’ party identification. Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Pollet JM, Wilson M (2008) How does size affect mutual fund behavior? J. Finance 63:2941–2969.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pool VK, Stoffman N, Yonker SE, Zhang H (2019) Do shocks to personal wealth affect risk-taking in delegated portfolios? Rev. Financial Stud. 32:1457–1493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prather LJ, Middleton KL (2002) Are n+1 heads better than one? The case of mutual fund managers. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 47:103–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockenbach B, Sadrieh A, Mathauschek B (2007) Teams take the better risks. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 63:412–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunstein CR (2016) Partyism. University Chicago Legal Forum 2015(1):23–32.Google Scholar
  • Westfall J, VanBoven L, Chambers JR, Judd CM (2015) Perceiving political polarization in the United States: Party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspective Psych. Sci. 10:145–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westwood SJ, Iyengar S, Walgrave S, Leonisio R, Miller L, Strijbis O (2018) The tie that divides: Cross-national evidence of the primacy of partyism. Eur. J. Political Res. 57:333–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersema MF, Bird A (1993) Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Acad. Management J. 36:996–1025.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wintoki MB, Xi Y (2020) Partisan bias in fund portfolios. J. Financial Quant. Anal. 55(5):1717–1754.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.