Only the Ugly Face? A Theoretical Model of Brand Dilution

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.00852

References

  • Aaker D (1990) Brand extensions: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Sloan Management Rev. 31:47–56.Google Scholar
  • Aaker DA, Keller KL (1990) Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. J. Marketing 54(1):27–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arora A, Fosfuri A, Rønde T (2013) Managing licensing in a market for technology. Management Sci. 59(5):1092–1106.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bărbulescu Robinson A, Tuli KR, Kohli AK (2015) Does brand licensing increase a licensor’s shareholder value? Management Sci. 61(6):1436–1455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharyya S, Lafontaine F (1995) Double-sided moral hazard and the nature of share contracts. RAND J. Econom. 26(4):761–781.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bousquet A, Cremer H, Ivaldi M, Wolkowicz M (1998) Risk sharing in licensing. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 16(5):535–554.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broniarczyk SM, Alba JW (1994) The importance of the brand in brand extension. J. Marketing Res. 31(2):214–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cabral LM (2000) Stretching firm and brand reputation. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):658–673.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cabral LM (2009) Umbrella branding with imperfect observability and moral hazard. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):206–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calzolari G, Denicolò V, Zanchettin P (2020) The demand-boost theory of exclusive dealing. RAND J. Econom. 51(3):713–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi JP (2001) Technology transfer with moral hazard. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 19(1):249–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica (N.S.) 4(16):386–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colucci M, Montaguti E, Lago U (2008) Managing brand extension via licensing: An investigation into the high-end fashion industry. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 25(2):129–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Condorelli D, Padilla J (2022) Vertical mergers in ecosystems with consumer hold-up. Working paper, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.Google Scholar
  • Corbellini E, Saviolo S (2014) Managing Fashion and Luxury Companies (Etas Libri, Milan).Google Scholar
  • Czellar S (2003) Consumer attitude toward brand extensions: An integrative model and research propositions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 20(1):97–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fournier S, Boer J (2002) Calvin Klein, Inc. vs. Warnaco Group, Inc. Harvard Business School, Case 9-503-011, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Gürhan-Canli Z, Maheswaran D (1998) The effects of extensions on brand name dilution and enhancement. J. Marketing Res. 35(4):464–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hakenes H, Peitz M (2008) Umbrella branding and the provision of quality. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(2):546–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hariharan VG, Bezawada R, Talukdar D (2015) Aggregate impact of different brand development strategies. Management Sci. 61(5):1164–1182.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hernández-Murillo R, Llobet G (2006) Patent licensing revisited: Heterogeneous firms and product differentiation. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 24(1):149–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jayachandran S, Kaufman P, Kumar V, Hewett K (2013) Brand licensing: What drives royalty rates? J. Marketing 77(5):108–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John DR, Loken B, Joiner C (1998) The negative impact of extensions: Can flagship products be diluted? J. Marketing 62(1):19–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller KL, Aaker DA (1992) The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. J. Marketing Res. 29(1):35–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller KL, Sood S (2003) Brand equity dilution. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 45(1):12.Google Scholar
  • Keller KL, Apéria T, Georgson M (2008) Strategic Brand Management: A European Perspective (Pearson Education, Essex, UK).Google Scholar
  • Loken B, John DR (1993) Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact? J. Marketing 57(3):71–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michel G, Donthu N (2014) Why negative brand extension evaluations do not always negatively affect the brand: The role of central and peripheral brand associations. J. Bus. Res. 67(12):2611–2619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miklós-Thal J (2012) Linking reputations through umbrella branding. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(3):2335–2374.Google Scholar
  • Milberg SJ, Cuneo A, Silva M, Goodstein RC (2023) Parent brand susceptibility to negative feedback effects from brand extensions: A meta-analysis of experimental consumer findings. J. Consumer Psych. 33(1):21–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miniard PW, Jayanti RK, Alvarez CM, Dickson PR (2018) What brand extensions need to fully benefit from their parental heritage. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 46(5):948–963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park CW, Milberg S, Lawson R (1991) Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. J. Consumer Res. 18(2):185–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng C, Bijmolt THA, Völckner F, Zhao H (2023) A meta-analysis of brand extension sucess: The effects of parent brand equity and extension fit. J. Marketing 87(6):002224292311646.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pina JM, Riley FD, Lomax W (2013) Generalizing spillover effects of goods and service brand extensions: A meta-analysis approach. J. Bus. Res. 66(9):1411–1419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quelch JA (1985) How to build a product licensing program. Harvard Bus. Rev. 63(3):186–192.Google Scholar
  • Rasmusen EB (2016) Leveraging of reputation through umbrella branding: The implications for market structure. J. Econom. Management Strategy 25(2):261–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raugust K (2012) The Licensing Business Handbook: How to Make Money, Protect Trademarks, Extend Product Lines, Enhance Merchandising, Control Use of Images, and More, by Licensing Characters, Teams, Celebrities, Events, Trademarks, Fashion, Likenesses, Designs & Logos! (EPM Communications, New York).Google Scholar
  • Salinas EM, Pérez JMP (2009) Modeling the brand extensions’ influence on brand image. J. Bus. Res. 62(1):50–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saviolo S, Giannelli B (2001) Il Licensing Nel Sistema Moda. Evoluzione, Criticità, Prospettive (Etas Libri, Milan).Google Scholar
  • Sood S, Keller KL (2012) The effects of brand name structure on brand extension evaluations and parent brand dilution. J. Marketing Res. 49(3):373–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swaminathan V, Fox RJ, Reddy SK (2001) The impact of brand extension introduction on choice. J. Marketing 65(4):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tadelis S (1999) What’s in a name? Reputation as a tradeable asset. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(3):548–563.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tauman Y, Zhao C (2018) Patent licensing, entry and the incentive to innovate. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 56:229–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Völckner F, Sattler H (2006) Drivers of brand extension success. J. Marketing 70(2):18–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B (1988) Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signalling by posting a bond. RAND J. Econom. 19(3):458–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.