Keeping Invention Confidential

References

• Aguilera RF (2014) Production costs of global conventional and unconventional petroleum. Energy Policy 64:134–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeling DS, Snyder DW, Sapoznikow M, McCollum WE, Weader J (2010a) A statistical analysis of trade secret litigation in federal courts. Gonzaga Law Rev. 45(2):292–334.Google Scholar
• Almeling DS, Snyder DW, Sapoznikow M, McCollum WE, Weader J (2010b) A statistical analysis of trade secret litigation in state courts. Gonzaga Law Rev. 46(1):57–101.Google Scholar
• Amore MD (2020) Innovation disclosure in times of uncertainty. J. Econom. Management Strategy 29(4):792–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anton JJ, Yao DA (2004) Little patents and big secrets: Managing intellectual property. RAND J. Econom. 35(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A (1997) Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry. Res. Policy 26(4):391–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Lee H (2018) Reversed citations and the localization of knowledge spillovers. J. Econom. Geography 18(3):495–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Cohen WM, Walsh JP (2016) The acquisition and commercialization of invention in American manufacturing: Incidence and impact. Res. Policy 45(6):1113–1128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arqué-Castells P, Spulber DF (2022) Measuring the private and social returns to R&D: Unintended spillovers versus technology markets. J. Political Econom. 130(7):1860–1918.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (2007) The structure of invention. Res. Policy 36(2):274–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arundel A (2001) The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Res. Policy 30(4):611–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell G, Haq F, De Leon V, Ollivier P, Roy S, Simon P (2025a) Book reference terms, definitions, and cases. Ollivier P, Bell G, De Leon V, Roy S, eds. Business Secrets Management: Strategies to Protect, Extract and Maximize Value (Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland), 1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell G, Chapuis-Thuault V, Gorius A, Kapacinskaite A, Ollivier P, Račková K, Simon P (2025b) Business secrets increase asset value. Ollivier P, Bell G, De Leon V, Roy S, eds. Business Secrets Management: Strategies to Protect, Extract and Maximize Value (Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland), 57–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biasi B, Moser P (2021) Effects of copyrights on science: Evidence from the WWII book republication program. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 13(4):218–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Block JH, Fisch CO, Hahn A, Sandner PG (2015) Why do SMEs file trademarks? Insights from firms in innovative industries. Res. Policy 44(10):1915–1930.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2002) Patents, real options and firm performance. Econom. J. 112(478):C97–C116.Google Scholar
• Canay IA, Santos A, Shaikh AM (2021) The wild bootstrap with a “small” number of “large” clusters. Rev. Econom. Statist. 103(2):346–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castaldi C (2020) All the great things you can do with trademark data: Taking stock and looking ahead. Strategic Organ. 18(3):472–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castellaneta F, Conti R, Kacperczyk A (2017) Money secrets: How does trade secret legal protection affect firm market value? Evidence from the uniform trade secret act. Strategic Management J. 38(4):834–853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen D, Gao H, Ma Y (2021) Human capital-driven acquisition: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine. Management Sci. 67(8):4643–4664.Link, Google Scholar
• Ciuriak D, Ptashkina M (2021) Quantifying trade secret theft: Policy implications. CIGI Paper 253, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Waterloo, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM (2010) Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. Hall BH, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 129–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Contigiani A, Testoni M (2023) Geographic isolation, trade secrecy, and innovation. Res. Policy 52(8):104825.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contigiani A, Hsu DH, Barankay I (2018) Trade secrets and innovation: Evidence from the “inevitable disclosure” doctrine. Strategic Management J. 39(11):2921–2942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crass D, Garcia Valero F, Pitton F, Rammer C (2019) Protecting innovation through patents and trade secrets: Evidence for firms with a single innovation. Internat. J. Econom. Bus. 26(1):117–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cronin C (2015) Lost and found: Intellectual property of the fragrance industry; from trade secret to trade dress. NYU J. Intellectual Property Entertainment Law 5(1):257–305.Google Scholar
• Cunningham S (2021) Causal Inference: The Mixtape (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis T (2016) Unraveling the US Shale Productivity Gains (Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis T (2017) US Shale Oil Dynamics in a Low Price Environment (Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy (2019) Fossil fuel supply curves. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fossil-fuel-price-assumptions-2019.Google Scholar
• Dyer T A, Glaeser S, Lang M H, Sprecher C (2024) The effect of patent disclosure quality on innovation. J. Accounting Econom. 77:101647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Union Intellectual Property Office (2017) Protection innovation through trade secrets and patents: Determinants for European Union firms. Accessed June 23, 2025, https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/reports/Trade%20Secrets%20Report_en.pdf.Google Scholar
• Fadeev E (2023) Creative construction. Working paper, Duke University, Fuqua School of Business, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Fetter TR, Steck AL, Timmins C, Wrenn D (2018) Learning by viewing? Social learning, regulatory disclosure, and firm productivity in shale gas. NBER Working Paper No. 25401, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Feyrer J, Mansur ET, Sacerdote B (2017) Geographic dispersion of economic shocks: Evidence from the fracking revolution. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(4):1313–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein A (2007) The aggregate effects of health insurance: Evidence from the introduction of Medicare. Quart. J. Econom. 122(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisk JM (2013) The right to know? State politics of fracking disclosure. Rev. Policy Res. 30(4):345–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fontana R, Nuvolari A, Shimizu H, Vezzulli A (2013) Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004. Res. Policy 42(10):1780–1792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman DD, Landes WM, Posner RA (1991) Some economics of trade secret law. J. Econom. Perspect. 5(1):61–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganglmair B, Reimers I (2019) Visibility of technology and cumulative innovation: Evidence from trade secrets laws. Preprint, submitted June 10, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3393510.Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S (2017) Endogenous appropriability. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):317–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giuri P, Mariani M, Brusoni S, Crespi G, Francoz D, Gambardella A, Garcia-Fontes W, Geuna A, Gonzales R, Harhoff D (2007) Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Res. Policy 36(8):1107–1127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham S, Hegde D (2015) Disclosing patents’ secrets. Science 347(6219):236–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross DP (2023) The hidden costs of securing innovation: The manifold impacts of compulsory invention secrecy. Management Sci. 69(4):2318–2338.Google Scholar
• Hall R (1992) The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management J. 13(2):135–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall KB (2013) Hydraulic fracturing: Trade secrets and the mandatory disclosure of fracturing water composition. Idaho Law Rev., https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/faculty_scholarship/189.Google Scholar
• Hall B, Helmers C, Rogers M, Sena V (2014) The choice between formal and informal intellectual property: A review. J. Econom. Literature 52(2):375–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. 32:101–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harhoff D (1996) Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development. Management Sci. 42(6):907–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Hegde D, Luo H (2018) Patent publication and the market for ideas. Management Sci. 64(2):652–672.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong S-H (2013) Measuring the effect of Napster on recorded music sales: Difference-in-differences estimates under compositional changes. J. Appl. Econometrics 28(2):297–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hussinger K (2006) Is silence golden? Patents versus secrecy at the firm level. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 15(8):735–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jensen PH, Webster E (2009) Knowledge management: Does capture impede creation? Indust. Corporate Change 18(4):701–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson C (2021) Intellectual property and the law of fracking fluid disclosures: Tensions and trends. ONE J. 6.Google Scholar
• Kang H, Lee W (2022) How innovating firms manage knowledge leakage: A natural experiment on the threat of worker departure. Strategic Management J. 43(10):1961–1982.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Murmann JP (2024) The organizational and technological origins of the U.S. shale gas revolution, 1947 to 2012. Indust. Corporate Change 33(1):106–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Rosenberger JD, Eisenhardt KM (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):295–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg R (2011) Learning by drilling: Interfirm learning and relationship persistence in the Texas oilpatch. Quart. J. Econom. 126(4):1961–2004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kline SJ, Rosenberg N (1985) An overview of innovation. Studies on Science and the Innovation Process (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore), 173–203.Google Scholar
• Konschnik K, Dayalu A (2016) Hydraulic fracturing chemicals reporting: Analysis of available data and recommendations for policymakers. Energy Policy 88:504–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krane J (2017) Beyond 12.5: The implications of an increase in Saudi crude oil production capacity. Energy Policy 110:542–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemley M (2008) The surprising virtues of treating trade secrets as IP rights. Stanford Law Rev. 61(2):311–353.Google Scholar
• Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG, Gilbert R, Griliches Z (1987) Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 1987(3):783–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine DS, Seaman CB (2018) The DTSA at one: An empirical study of the first year of litigation under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. Washington and Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2018-03, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA.Google Scholar
• Li X, MacGarvie M, Moser P (2018) Dead poets’ property—How does copyright influence price? RAND J. Econom. 49(1):181–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linton K (2016) The importance of trade secrets: New directions in international trade policy making and empirical research. J. Internat Commerce Econom. 1–17.Google Scholar
• Lippoldt D, Schultz MF (2014) Uncovering Trade Secrets—An Empirical Assessment of Economic Implications of Protection for Undisclosed Data (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Holditch S (2015) Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources Handbook: Evaluation and Development (Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham, MA).Google Scholar
• Maynard IJ (2013) Fracking the oil and gas trade secrets of the Marcellus shale natural gas play. Kentucky J. Equine Agriculture Natural Resources Law 6(1):8.Google Scholar
• McFeeley M (2012) State hydraulic fracturing disclosure rules and enforcement: A comparison. Report, NRDC, New York.Google Scholar
• Mezzanotti F, Simcoe T (2023) Innovation and appropriability: Revisiting the role of intellectual property. NBER Working Paper No. 31428, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Montgomery CT, Smith MB (2010) Hydraulic fracturing: History of an enduring technology. J. Petroleum Tech. 62(12):26–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moser P (2013) Patents and innovation: Evidence from economic history. J. Econom. Perspect. 27(1):23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagaraj A (2018) Does copyright affect reuse? Evidence from Google Books and Wikipedia. Management Sci. 64(7):3091–3107.Link, Google Scholar
• Noel M, Schankerman M (2013) Strategic patenting and software innovation. J. Indust. Econom. 61(3):481–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn SG, Vengosh A, Warner NR, Jackson RB (2011) Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(20):8172–8176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A (1985) On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. J. Political Econom. 93(2):390–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker HR (2015) Trade secrets and patent protection: The unlikely power couple under the AIA. Syracuse J. Sci. Tech. Law 32:1–30.Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Sharpe, New York).Google Scholar
• Png IPL (2017a) Law and innovation: Evidence from state trade secrets laws. Rev. Econom. Statist. 99(1):167–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Png IPL (2017b) Secrecy and patents: Theory and evidence from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Strategy Sci. 2(3):176–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zhou KZ, Li JJ (2016) When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance. Strategic Management J. 37(4):724–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quosay AA, Knez D, Ziaja J (2020) Hydraulic fracturing: New uncertainty based modeling approach for process design using Monte Carlo simulation technique. PLoS One 15(7):e0236726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Risch M (2007) Why do we have trade secrets. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Rev. 11(1):1–76.Google Scholar
• Ryu W, McCann BT, Reuer JJ (2018) Geographic co-location of partners and rivals: Implications for the design of R&D alliances. Acad. Management J. 61(3):945–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandeen SK (2010) The evolution of trade secret law and why courts commit error when they do not follow the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Hamline Law Rev. 33:493.Google Scholar
• Schwartz A (2013) The corporate preference for trade secret. Ohio State Law J. 74(4):623–668.Google Scholar
• Searle N (2021) The economic and innovation impacts of trade secrets. UK Intellectual Property Office Research Paper No. 2021/01, Newport, South Wales, UK.Google Scholar
• Sequeira S (2016) Corruption, trade costs, and gains from tariff liberalization: Evidence from Southern Africa. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(10):3029–3063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharapov D, MacAulay SC (2022) Design as an isolating mechanism for capturing value from innovation: From cloaks and traps to sabotage. Acad. Management Rev. 47(1):139–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder DW, Almeling DS (2012) Keeping Secrets: A Practical Introduction to Trade Secret Law and Strategy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Sofka W, de Faria P, Shehu E (2018) Protecting knowledge: How legal requirements to reveal information affect the importance of secrecy. Res. Policy 47(3):558–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr E, Prescott JJ, Bishara N (2021) Noncompete agreements in the U.S. labor force. J. Law Econom. 64(1):53–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallman S, Jenkins M, Henry N, Pinch S (2004) Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 29(2):258–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang S (2024) The transparency dilemma: Environmental disclosure under the threat of technology expropriation. Preprint, submitted May 13, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4825754.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomä J, Bizer K (2013) To protect or not to protect? Modes of appropriability in the small enterprise sector. Res. Policy 42(1):35–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tosto F, Nuttall E (2012) Protecting your intellectual capital in the Canadian oil and gas industry. Alberta Law Rev. 50(2):271–300. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uniform Law Commission (1985) Uniform Trade Secrets Act. https://www.uniformlaws.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=e19b2528-e0b1-0054-23c4-8069701a4b62.Google Scholar
• U.S. Chamber of Commerce (2014) The case for enhanced protection of trade secrets in the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement. https://www.uschamber.com/assets/archived/images/legacy/international/files/Final%20TPP%20Trade%20Secrets%208_0.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration (2014) International Energy Outlook. Report, Deloitte Oil and Gas Conference. https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/sieminski_11182014.pdf.Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016) Today in energy: Hydraulic fracturing accounts for about half of current U.S. crude oil production. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=25372.Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018) Today in energy: Hydraulically fractured horizontal wells account for most new oil and natural gas wells. Accessed March 19, 2021, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=34732.Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration (2020) Today in energy: U.S. crude oil and natural gas production in 2019 hit records with fewer rigs and wells. Accessed March 19, 2021, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=44236.Google Scholar
• Veugelers R, Schneider C (2018) Which IP strategies do young highly innovative firms choose? Small Bus. Econom. 50(1):113–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaby AK (2010) Losing the lead: The patenting decision in the light of the disclosure requirement. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 19(2):147–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziedonis RH (2004) Don’t fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Sci. 50(6):804–820.Link, Google Scholar