The Effects of a Short-Term Corporate Social Impact Activity on Employee Turnover: Field Experimental Evidence

References

• Abraham M, Burbano VC (2022) Congruence between leadership gender and organizational claims affects the gender composition of the applicant pool: Field experimental evidence. Organ. Sci. 33(1):393–413.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis R (2009) Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. 30:1349–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Glavas A (2012) What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. J. Management 38:932–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Glavas A (2013) Embedded vs. peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Indust. Organ. Psych. 6:1–40.Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Glavas A (2019) On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. J. Management 45:1057–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Villamor I, Lazzarini SG, Vassolo RS, Amorós JE, Allen DG (2020) Conducting management research in Latin America: Why and what’s in it for you? J. Management 46:615–636.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91:444–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Aven BL, Kush J (2018) The effects of communication networks and turnover on transactive memory and group performance. Organ. Sci. 29:191–206.Link, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Sluss DM, Harrison SH (2007) Socialization in organizational contexts. Hodgkinson GP, Ford JK, eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Wiley, Chichester, UK), 1–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24:737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51:1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA (2001) Social comparisons in boundary-spanning work: Effects of community outreach on members’ organizational identity and identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46:379–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Singh J (2018) Taking a hit to save the world: Employee participation in social initiatives. Strategic Management J. 39:1003–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Singh J, Rogan M (2015) Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organ. Sci. 26:1702–1720.Link, Google Scholar
• Bode C, Singh J, Rogan M (2022) Up to no good? Gender, social impact work, and employee promotions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(1):82–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brislin R (1970) Back translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 1:185–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Sherman DK (2019) Wise interventions in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 39:100125.Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Senior D, Welch W (2014) Corporate volunteerism, the experience of self-integrity, and organizational commitment: Evidence from the field. Soc. Justice Res. 27:1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2016) Social responsibility messages and worker wage requirements: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Sci. 27:1010–1028.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021a) Getting gig workers to do more by doing good: Field experimental evidence from online labor marketplaces. Organ. Environ. 34(3):387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC (2021b) The demotivating effects of communication a social political stance: Field experimental evidence from an online labor market platform. Management Sci. 67(2):1004–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC, Chiles B (2022) Mitigating gig and remote worker misconduct: Evidence from a real effort experiment. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1273–1299.Link, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC, Mamer J, Snyder J (2018) Pro bono as a human capital strategy: Evidence from law firms. Strategic Management J. 39:2899–2920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burbano VC, Meier S, Padilla N (2022) Gender differences in preferences for meaning at work. Working paper, Columbia Business School, New York.Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Judge TA (1996) Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67:294–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable DM, Gino F, Staats BR (2013) Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-expression. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caligiuri P, Mencin A, Jiang K (2013) Win-win-win: The influence of company-sponsored volunteerism programs on employees, NGOs, and business units. Personnel Psych. 66:825–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Agarwal R, Campbell BA (2012) Heterogeneity in turnover: The effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers. Strategic Management J. 33:1411–1430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Kryscynski D, Olson D (2017) How corporate social responsibility reduces employee turnover: Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1932–1962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen E, Gavious I (2015) Does CSR have different value implications for different shareholders? Finance Res. Lett. 14:29–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cnaan R, Meijs L, Brudney J, Hersberger-Langloh S, Okada A, Abu-Rumman S (2021) You thought that this would be easy? Seeking an understanding of episodic volunteering. Voluntas 33:415–427.Google Scholar
• Cohen Charash Y, Spector PE (2002) The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 86(2):278–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn A, Fehr E, Maréchal MA (2014) Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature 516:86–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crane B (2020) Revisiting who, when, and why stakeholders matter: Trust and stakeholder connectedness. Bus. Soc. 59(2):263–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Ni N, Jiang Y (2016) Do-no-harm vs. do-good social responsibility: Attributional thinking and the liability of foreignness. Strategic Management J. 37:1316–1329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Roeck K, Marique G, Stinglhamber F, Swaen V (2014) Understanding employees’ responses to corporate social responsibility: Mediating roles of overall justice and organisational identification. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 25:91–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einolf C (2011) Gender differences in the correlates of volunteering and charitable giving. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Quart. 40(6):1092–1112. 10.1177/0899764010385949.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Akremi A, Gond JP, Swaen V, De Roeck K, Igalens J (2015) How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. J. Management 44(2):619–657.Google Scholar
• Elovainio M, Kivimaki M, Helkama K (2001) Organizational justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain. J. Appl. Psych. 86:418–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enders CK, Bandalos DL (2001) The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structuarl Equation Model. 8(3):430–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans WR, Davis WD (2011) An examination of perceived corporate citizenship, job applicant attraction, and CSR work role definition. Bus. Soc. 50:456–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang X, Cho S-H (2020) Cooperative approaches to managing social responsibility in a market with externalities. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1215–1233.Link, Google Scholar
• Farooq O, Rupp D, Farooq M (2017) The multiple pathways through which internal and external corporate social responsibility influence organizational identification and multifoci outcomes: The moderating role of cultural and social orientations. Acad. Management J. 60(3):954–985.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Kacperczyk A (2019) Corporate social responsibility as a defense against knowledge spillovers: Evidence from the inevitable disclosure doctrine. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1243–1267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Luo J (2016) Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Strategic Management J. 38:163–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Lindenberg S (2013) Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Acad. Management Perspect. 27:85–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganster DC, Rosen CC (2013) Work stress and employee health: A multidisciplinary review. J. Management 39:1085–1122.Google Scholar
• Gatignon A (2022) The double-edged sword of boundary-spanning corporate social responsibility programs. Strategic Management J. 43(10):2156–2184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gatignon-Turnau AL, Mignonac K (2015) (Mis)Using employee volunteering for public relations: Implications for corporate volunteers’ organizational commitment. J. Bus. Res. 68(1):7–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gellatly IR, Meyer JP, Luchak AA (2006) Combined effects of the three commitment components on focal and discretionary behaviors: A test of Meyer and Herscovitch’s propositions. J. Vocational Behav. 69(2):331–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilboa S, Shirom A, Fried Y, Cooper C (2008) A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance: Examining main and moderating effects. Personnel Psych. 61(2):227–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glebbeek AC, Bax EH (2004) Is high employee turnover really harmful? An empirical test using company records. Acad. Management J. 47:277–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh J, Pfeffer J, Zenios SA (2016) The relationship between workplace stressors and mortality and health costs in the United States. Management Sci. 62(2):608–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez K, Portocarrero F, Ekema-Agbaw M (2022) Disposition activation during organizational change: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. 76(3):829–883.Google Scholar
• Grant AM (2012) Giving time, time after time: Work design and sustained employee participation in corporate volunteering. Acad. Management Rev. 37:589–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Fung A, Murphy C (2021) Out of character: CEO political ideology, peer influence, and adoption of CSR executive position by Fortune 500 firms. Strategic Management J. 42:529–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Shaw JD (2014) Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research. Human Resource Management Rev. 24:1–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn T, Preuss L, Pinkse J, Figge F (2014) Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sense-making with paradoxical and business case frames. Acad. Management Rev. 39:463–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hassard J, Teoh K, Visockaite G, Dewe P, Cox T (2018) The cost of work-related stress to society: A systematic review. J. Occupational Health Psych. 23(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausknecht JP, Trevor CO, Howard MJ (2009) Unit-level voluntary turnover rates and customer service quality: Implications of group cohesiveness, newcomer concentration, and size. J. Appl. Psych. 94:1068–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heavey AL, Holwerda JA, Hausknecht JP (2013) Causes and consequences of collective turnover: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psych. 98:412–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hejjas K, Miller G, Scarles C (2019) “It’s like hating puppies”! Employee disengagement and corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 157:319–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffmann BJ, Woehr DJ (2006) A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. J. Vocational Behav. 68:389–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofman PS, Newman A (2014) The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment and the moderating role of collectivism and masculinity: Evidence from China. Internat. J. Human Resource Management 25:631–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland SJ, Shore DB, Cortina JM (2017) Review and recommendations for integrating mediation and moderation. Organ. Res. Methods 20(4):686–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu J, Jiang K, Mo S, Chen H, Shi J (2016) The motivational antecedents and performance consequences of corporate volunteering: When do employees volunteer and when does volunteering help vs. harm work performance? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 137:99–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hülsheger UR, Lang JW, Schewe AF, Zijlstra FR (2015) When regulating emotions at work pays off: A diary and an intervention study on emotion regulation and customer tips in service jobs. J. Appl. Psych. 100(2):263–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyde MK, Dunn J, Scuffham PA, Chamber SK (2014) A systematic review of episodic volunteering in public health and other contexts. BMC Public Health 14:992.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jamali D, Karam C (2018) Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. Internat. J. Management Rev. 20(1):32–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones DA (2010) Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification & social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 83(4):857–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones DA (2016) Widely assumed but thinly tested: Do employee volunteers’ self-reported skill improvements reflect the nature of their volunteering experiences? Frontiers Psych. 7:1–14.Google Scholar
• Jones DA, Willness CR, Madey S (2014) Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 57:383–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Colquitt JA (2004) Organizational justice and stress: The mediating role of work-family conflict. J. Appl. Psych. 89:395–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kast F, Meier S, Pomeranz D (2016) Saving more in groups: Field experimental evidence from Chile. J. Development Econom. 133:275–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kensbock JM, Alkærsig L, Lomberg C (2022) The epidemic of mental disorders in business—How depression, anxiety, and stress spread across organizations through employee mobility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67:1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Trevino LK (2010) Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. J. Appl. Psych. 95:1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivimaki M, Leino-Arjas P, Luukkonen R, Riihimaki H, Vahtera J, Kirjonen J (2002) Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality: Prospective cohort study of industrial employees. BMJ 325:857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraft T, Valdes L, Zheng Y (2020) Motivating supplier social responsibility under incomplete visibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 22(6):1268–1286.Link, Google Scholar
• Kristof AL (1996) Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psych. 49:1–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert B, Caza BB, Trinh E, Ashford S (2022) Individual-centered interventions: Identifying what, how, and why interventions work in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Ann. 16(2):508–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS (1966) Psychological Stress and the Coping Process (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS (1999) Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal and Coping (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR (1994) An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Acad. Management Rev. 19:51–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Q, Lourie B, Nekrasov A, Shevlin T (2022) Employee turnover and firm performance: Large-sample archival evidence. Management Sci. 68(8):5667–5683.Link, Google Scholar
• List JA, Momeni F (2020) When corporate social responsibility backfires: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Management Sci. 67(1):8–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Lungeanu R, Weber K (2021) Social responsibility beyond the corporate: Executive mental accounting across sectoral and issue domains. Organ. Sci. 32(6):1473–1491.Link, Google Scholar
• Mael F, Ashforth BE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 13:103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malos S, Lester GV, Virick M (2018) Uber drivers and employment status in the gig economy should corporate social responsibility tip the scales? Employee Responsibilities Rights J. 30:239–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2001) People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahweh, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Elfenbein HA, Walsh JP (2007) Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Medeiros R (2016) Handling missing data in Stata: Imputation and likelihood-based approaches. 2016 Swiss Stata Users Group Meeting. Accessed December 10, 2022, https://www.stata.com/meeting/switzerland16/slides/medeiros-switzerland16.pdf.Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Mitchell TR, Liu D (2015) Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Acad. Management Rev. 40(4):515–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odziemkowska K, Henisz W (2021) Webs of influence: Secondary stakeholder actions and cross-national corporate social performance. Organ. Sci. 32(1):233–255.Link, Google Scholar
• Paço AD, Nave AC (2013) Corporate volunteering: A case study centred on motivations, satisfaction and happiness of company employees. Employee Relations 35:547–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillai SD, Goldfarb B, Kirsch D (2021) Using historical methods to improve abduction and inference to the best explanation in strategy. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston.Google Scholar
• Pless NM, Maak T, Stahl GK (2011) Developing responsible global leaders through international service learning programs: The Ulysses experience. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 10:237–260.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, LePine JA, LePine MA (2007) Differential challenge stressor–hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 92:438–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Portocarrero FF, Winkler A-LP, Pearce JL (2023) Broadening our understanding of human resource management for improved environmental performance. Bus. Soc. 62(1):14–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riketta M (2005) Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. J. Vocational Behav. 66:358–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodell JB (2013) Finding meaning through volunteering: Why do employees volunteer and what does it mean for their jobs? Acad. Management J. 56:1274–1294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodell JB, Sabey TB, Rogers KM (2020) “Tapping” into good will: Enhancing corporate reputation through customer volunteering. Acad. Management J. 63(6):1714–1738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodell JB, Booth J, Lynch J, Zipay K (2017) Corporate volunteering climate: Mobilizing employee passion for societal causes and inspiring future charitable action. Acad. Management J. 60:1662–1681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodell JB, Breitsohl H, Schröder M, Keating D (2016) Employee volunteering: A review and framework for future research. J. Management 42:55–84.Google Scholar
• Rosati F, Costa R, Calabrese A, Pedersen ERG (2018) Employee attitudes toward corporate social responsibility: A study on gender, age and educational level differences. Corporate Soc. Responsibility Environ. Management 25:1306–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rupp D, Shao R, Thornton M, Skarlicki D (2013) Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psych. 66(4):895–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rupp DE (2011) An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organ. Psych. Rev. 1(1):72–94.Google Scholar
• Rupp DE, Mallory DB (2015) Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2:211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saks AM, Ashforth BE (2002) Is job search related to employment quality? It all depends on the fit. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):646–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck J, Cotton JL, Jennings KR (1989) Antecedents and consequences of role stress: A covariance structure analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 10(1):35–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Servaes H, Tamayo A (2013) The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Sci. 59(5):1045–1061.Link, Google Scholar
• Shadish WR, Cook TD (2009) The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Annual Rev. Psych. 60(1):607–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw JD, Duffy MK, Johnson JL, Lockhart DE (2005) Turnover, social capital losses, and performance. Acad. Management J. 48:594–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shea C, Hawn O (2019) Microfoundations of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1609–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Teng N, Netessine S (2019) Philanthropic campaigns and customer behavior: Field experiments on an online taxi booking platform. Management Sci. 65(2):913–932.Link, Google Scholar
• Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Schuh SC, Jetten J, Van Dick R (2017) A meta-analytic review of social identification and health in organizational contexts. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 21:303–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Coraiola D, Harvey C, Foster W (2020) History and the micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 41:530–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan SE, Bhagat RS (1992) Organizational stress, job satisfaction, and job performance: Where do we go from here? J. Management 18:353–374.Google Scholar
• Tonin M, Vlassopoulos M (2015) Corporate philanthropy and productivity: Evidence from an online real effort experiment. Management Sci. 61(8):1795–1811.Link, Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ, Vansteelandt S (2009) Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Statist. Interface 2:457–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vazquez-Bare G (2022) Identification and estimation of spillover effects in randomized experiments. J. Econometrics. 237(1):105237.Google Scholar
• Vermunt R, Steensma H (2001) Stress and justice in organizations: An exploration into justice processes with the aim to find mechanisms to reduce stress. Cropanzano R, ed. Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, vol. 2 (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 27–48.Google Scholar
• Wagner T, Lutz RJ, Weitz BA (2009) Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. J. Marketing 73:77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GM (2014) The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 23:73–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GM, Wilson TD (2018) Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psych. Rev. 125(5):617–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Wong KFE, Cheng C (2020) The turnover intention–behavior link: A culture-moderated meta-analysis. J. Management Stud. 57(6):1174–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood DJ (2010) Measuring corporate social performance: A review. Internat. J. Management Rev. 12:50–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Wu C, Chen CC, Zhou Z (2022) The influence of corporate social responsibility on incumbent employees: A meta-analytic investigation of the mediating and moderating mechanisms. J. Management 48(1):1–33.Google Scholar