Incentivizing Organ Donation Under Different Priority Rules: The Role of Information

References

• Abadie A, Gay S (2006) The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study. J. Health Econom. 25:599–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Ashlagi I, Somaini P, Waldinger D (2018) Dynamic incentives in wait list mechanisms. AEA Paper Proc. 108:341–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal N, Ashlagi I, Rees MA, Somaini P, Waldinger D (2021) Equilibrium allocations under alternative waitlist designs: Evidence from deceased donor kidneys. Econometrica 89(1):37–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1988) Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. J. Public Econom. 37(3):291–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arshad A, Anderson B, Sharif A (2019) Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems. Kidney Internat. 95:1453–1460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ata B, Friedewald J, Randa AC (2020) Structural estimation of kidney transplant candidates’ quality of life scores: Improving national kidney allocation policy under endogenous patient choice and geographical sharing. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Ata B, Skaro A, Tayur S (2016) Organjet: Overcoming geographical disparities in access to deceased donor kidneys in the United States. Management Sci. 63(9):2776–2794.Link, Google Scholar
• Baughn D, Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL (2006) Intention to register as organ donors: A survey of adolescents. Progress Transplantation 16(3):260–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Elias JJ (2007) Introducing incentives in the market for live and cadaveric organ donations. J. Econom. Perspective 21(3):3–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Elias JJ, Ye KJ (2022) The shortage of kidneys for transplant: Altruism, exchanges, opt in vs. opt out, and the market for kidneys. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 202:211–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein L (2016) Private sector act to reduce organ transplant waiting list. Washington Post (June 13), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/06/13/white-house-private-sector-act-to-reduce-organ-transplant-waiting-list/.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Farias VF, Trichakis N (2013) Fairness, efficiency, and flexibility in organ allocation for kidney transplantation. Oper. Res. 61(1):73–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Berzon C (2018) Israel’s 2008 organ transplant law: Continued ethical challenges to the priority points model. Isralian J. Health Policy Res. 7:11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkell JA, Chandler JA, Shemie SD (2013) Attitudes toward reciprocity systems for organ donation and allocation for transplantation. J. Health Political Policy Law 38(5):957–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AM, Massie A, Alexander C, Stewart B, Montgomery RA, Benavides NR, Fleming GD, et al. (2013) Social media and organ donor registration: The Facebook effect. Amer. J. Transplantation 13(8):2059–2065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cha AE (2015) Inequality in U.S. organ transplants: Researchers detail how the wealthy game the system. Washington Post (November 12), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2015/11/11/inequality-in-u-s-organ-transplants-researchers-detail-how-the-wealthy-game-the-system/.Google Scholar
• Chan A (2020) US organ donation policy. JAMA 323(3):278–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A (2011) Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experiment. Econom. 14(1):47–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cherry MJ (2017) Organ vouchers and barter markets: Saving lives, reducing suffering, and trading in human organs. J. Medicine Philosophy 42(5):503–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• CODAC (2018) Accessed March 25, 2022, www.codac.org.cn/cstatute/transcplantationdocments/201601223/699067.htm.Google Scholar
• Costa-Font J, Rudisill C, Salcher-Konrad M (2021) ‘Relative consent’ or ‘presumed consent’? Organ donation attitudes and behaviour. Eur. J. Health Econom. 22(1):5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai T, Zheng R, Sycara K (2020) Jumping the line, charitably: Analysis and remedy of donor-priority rule. Management Sci. 66(2):622–641.Link, Google Scholar
• Dickert-Conlin S, Elder T, Moore B (2011) Donorcycles: Motorcycle helmet laws and the supply of organ donors. J. Law Econom. 54(4):907–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eames K, Holder P, Zambrano E (2017) Solving the kidney shortage via the creation of kidney donation co-operatives. J. Health Econom. 54:91–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elias JJ, Lacetera N, Macis M (2015) Sacred values? The effect of information on attitudes toward payments for human organs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):361–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ergin H, Sönmez T, Ünver MU (2020) Efficient and incentive-compatible liver exchange. Econometrica 88(3):965–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabre J, Murphy P, Matesanz R (2010) Presumed consent: A distraction in the quest for increasing rates of organ donation. BMJ 341:c4973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Genie MG, Nicoló A, Pasini G (2020) The role of heterogeneity of patients’ preferences in kidney transplantation. J. Health Econom. 72:102331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glander P, Budde K, Schmidt D, Fuller TF, Giessing M, Neumayer H-H, Liefeldt L (2010) The ‘blood group O problem’ in kidney transplantation-time to change? Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 25(6):1998–2004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glazier A, Mone T (2019) Success of opt-in organ donation policy in the United States. JAMA 322(8):719–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg DS, French B, Abt PL, Gilroy RK (2015) Increasing the number of organ transplants in the United States by optimizing donor authorization rates. Amer. J. Transplantation 15(8):2117–2125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon EJ, Patel CH, Sohn M-W, Hippen B, Sherman LA (2015) Does financial compensation for living kidney donation change willingness to donate? Amer. J. Transplantation 15(1):265–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray R (2013) Registered organ donors could be given priority for transplants. The Telegraph (July 11), https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/10172247/Registered-organ-donors-could-be-given-priority-for-transplants.html.Google Scholar
• Harhay MN, Harhay MO, Ranganna K, Boyle SM, Mizrahi LL, Guy S, Malat GE, et al. (2018) Association of the kidney allocation system with dialysis exposure before deceased donor kidney transplantation by preemptive wait-listing status. Clinical Transplantation 32:e13386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy K, Krawiec KD (2017) Repugnance management and transactions in the body. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(5):86–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herr A, Normann H-T (2016) Organ donation in the laboratory: Preferences and votes on the priority rule. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 131:139–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herr A, Normann H-T (2019) How much priority bonus should be given to registered organ donors? An experimental analysis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 158:367–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hornberger J, Ahn J-H (1997) Deciding eligibility for transplantation when a donor kidney becomes available. Medical Decision Making 17(2):160–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• House J, Lacetera N, Macis M, Mazar N (2022) Nudging the nudger: A field experiment on the effect of performance feedback to service agents on increasing organ donor registrations. NBER Working Paper No. 30547, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Howard DH (2002) Why do transplant surgeons turn down organs? A model of the accept/reject decision. J. Health Econom. 21:957–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard DH (2007) Producing organ donors. J. Econom. Perspective 21(3):25–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard K, Jan S, Rose JM, Wong G, Irving M, Tong A, Craig JC, Chadban S, Allen RD, Cass A (2015) Community preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: A discrete choice study. Transplantation 99(3):560–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Husain SA, King KL, Dube GK, Tsapepas D, Cohen DJ, Ratner LE, Mohan S (2019) Regional disparities in transplantation with deceased donor kidneys with kidney donor profile index less than 20% among candidates with top 20% estimated post transplant survival. Progress Transplantation 29:354–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac RM, Walker JM (1988) Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contributions mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 103(1):179–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac R, Walker JM, Williams AW (1994) Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: Experimental evidence utilizing large groups. J. Public Econom. 54(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer T (1987) Kidneys for transplant: “Opting out” law in Singapore. Forensic Sci. Internat. 35(2):131–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Goldstein D (2003) Do defaults save lives? Science 302:1338–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler JB, Roth AE (2012) Organ allocation policy and the decision to donate. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2018–2047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler JB, Roth AE (2014a) Don’t take ‘no’ for an answer: An experiment with actual organ donor registrations. NBER Working Paper No. 20378, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kessler JB, Roth AE (2014b) Getting more organs for transplantation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):425–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kessler JB, Roth AE (2014c) Loopholes undermine donation: An experiment motivated by an organ donation priority loophole in Israel. J. Public Econom. 114:19–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Li M (2022) Optimal organ allocation policy under blood-type barriers with the donor-priority rule. Theoretical Econom. 17:331–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Li M, Xu M (2021) Organ donation with vouchers. J. Econom. Theory 191:105159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kong N, Schaefer AJ, Hunsaker B, Roberts MS (2010) Maximizing the efficiency of the U.S. liver allocation system through region design. Management Sci. 56(12):2111–2122.Link, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N, Macis M, Stith SS (2014) Removing financial barriers to organ and bone marrow donation: The effect of leave and tax legislation in the U.S. J. Health Econom. 33:43–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavee J, Brock DW (2012) Prioritizing registered donors in organ allocation: An ethical appraisal of the Israeli organ transplant law. Current Opinion Critical Care 18:707–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavee J, Ashkenazi T, Gurman G, Steinberg D (2010) A new law for allocation of donor organs in Israel. Lancet 375(9720):1131–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledyard JO (1995) Public goods: A survey of experimental research. Kagel J, Roth A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 111–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J. Econom. Perspective 21(2):153–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D (2016) Effect of persuasive messages on organ donation decisions: An experimental test. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 131:150–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D, Hawley Z, Schnier K (2013) Increasing organ donation via changes in the default choice or allocation rule. J. Health Econom. 32(6):1117–1129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li M, Riyanto YE, Xu M (2022) Remedying adverse selection in donor-priority rule using freeze period. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 194:384–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li M, Riyanto YE, Xu M (2023) Prioritized organ allocation rules under compatibility constraints. Games Econom. Behav. 141:403–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• López JS, Soria-Oliver M, Aramayona B, García-Sánchez R, Martínez JM, Martín MJ (2018) An integrated psychosocial model of relatives’ decision about deceased organ donation. Frontiers Psych. 9:408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• NASEM (2017) Opportunities for Organ Donor Intervention Research: Saving Lives by Improving the Quality and Quantity of Organs for Transplantation (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• NHMRC (2016) Ethical Guidelines for Organ Transplantation from Deceased Donors (National Health and Medical Research Council, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Oedingen C, Bartling T, Krauth C (2018) Public, medical professionals’ and patients’ preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: Study protocol for discrete choice experiments. BMJ Open 8(10):e026040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oedingen C, Bartling T, Mühlbacher AC, Schrem H, Krauth C (2019) Systematic review of public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: Principles of distributive justice. Patient Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 12(5):475–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oedingen C, Bartling T, Schrem H, Mühlbacher AC, Krauth C (2021) Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: A discrete choice experiment. Soc. Sci. Medicine 287:114360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oedingen C, Bartling T, Dierks M-L, Mühlbacher AC, Schrem H, Krauth C (2020) Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: Focus group discussions. Health Expectations 23(3):670–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plott C (1982) Industrial organization theory and experimental economics. J. Econom. Literature 20(2):1485–1527.Google Scholar
• Prottas JM (1983) Encouraging altruism: Public attitudes and the marketing of organ donation. Milbank Memorial Fund Quart. Health Soc. 61(2):278–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quigley M, Wright L, Ravitsky V (2012) Organ donation and priority points in Israel: An ethical analysis. Transplantation 93:970–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2007) Repugnance as a constraint on markets. J. Econom. Perspective 21(3):37–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2018) Marketplaces, markets, and market design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(7):1609–1658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sönmez T, Utku Ünver M (2004) Kidney exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 119(2):457–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sönmez T, Utku Ünver M (2005) A kidney exchange clearinghouse in New England. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):376–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sönmez T, Utku Ünver M (2007) Efficient kidney exchange: Coincidence of wants in markets with compatibility-based preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):828–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabouri A, Huh WT, Shechter SM (2017) Screening strategies for patients on the kidney transplant waiting list. Oper. Res. 65(5):1131–1146.Link, Google Scholar
• Shah MB, Vilchez V, Goble A, Daily MF, Berger JC, Gedaly R, DuBay DA (2018) Socioeconomic factors as predictors of organ donation. J. Surgical Res. 221:88–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharif A (2018) Presumed consent will not automatically lead to increased organ donation. Kidney Internat. 94:249–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepherd L, O’Carroll RE, Ferguson E (2014) An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: A panel study. BMC Medicine 12(1):131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith JM (2017) The gross inequality of organ transplants in America. The New Republic (November 8), https://newrepublic.com/article/145682/gross-inequality-organ-transplants-america.Google Scholar
• Smith V (1976) Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):274–279.Google Scholar
• Smith JM, Biggins SW, Haselby DG, Kim WR, Wedd J, Lamb K, Thompson B, et al. (2012) Kidney, pancreas and liver allocation and distribution in the United States. Amer. J. Transplantation 12(12):3191–3212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sönmez T, Ünver MU, Yenmez MB (2020) Incentivized kidney exchange. Amer. Econom. Rev. 110(7):2198–2244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart DE, Wilk AR, Toll AE, Harper AM, Lehman RR, Robinson AM, Noreen SA, Edwards EB, Klassen DK (2018) Measuring and monitoring equity in access to deceased donor kidney transplantation. Amer. J. Transplant. 18(8):1924–1935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoler A, Kessler JB, Ashkenazi T, Roth AE, Lavee J (2016) Incentivizing authorization for deceased organ donation with organ allocation priority: The first 5 years. Amer. J. Transplantation 16(9):2639–2645.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoler A, Kessler JB, Ashkenazi T, Roth AE, Lavee J (2017) Incentivizing organ donor registrations with organ allocation priority. Health Econom. 26(4):500–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X, Zenios S (2006) Recipient choice can address the efficiency-equity trade-off in kidney transplantation: A mechanism design model. Management Sci. 52(11):1647–1660.Link, Google Scholar
• Sullivan CD (2023) Eliciting preferences over life and death: Experimental evidence from organ transplantation. Working paper, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
• Teresi D (2012) What you lose when you sign that donor card. Wall Street Journal (April 4), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204603004577269910906351598.Google Scholar
• The Associated Press (2015) Wealthy more likely to get organ transplants. The National Post (November 9), https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wealth-boosts-chances-of-getting-organ-transplant/.Google Scholar
• Ugur ZB (2015) Does presumed consent save lives? Evidence from Europe. Health Econom. 24:1560–1572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Dalen HP, Henkens K (2014) Comparing the effects of defaults in organ donation systems. Soc. Sci. Medicine 106:137–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang G, Zheng R, Dai T (2021) Does transportation mean transplantation? Impact of new airline routes on sharing of cadaveric kidneys. Management Sci. 68(5):3660–3679.Google Scholar
• Zuniga-Fajuri A (2015) Increasing organ donation by presumed consent and allocation priority: Chile. Bull. World Health Organ. 93(3):199–202.Crossref, Google Scholar