Spaces for Creativity: Unconventional Workspaces and Divergent Thinking

References

• Abernathy WJ (1978) The Productivity Dilemma (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Acar O (2021) The Making of Creative Breakthroughs, California Management Review (Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Acar S, Runco MA (2011) Creative abilities: Divergent thinking. Mumford MJ, ed. Handbook of Organizational Creativity (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 115–139.Google Scholar
• Aggarwal I, Woolley AW (2019) Team creativity, cognition, and cognitive style diversity. Management Sci. 65(4):1586–1599.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahmadi S, Jansen JJ, Eggers JP (2022) Using stretch goals for idea generation among employees: One size does not fit all! Organ. Sci. 33(2):671–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10(1):123–167.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1997) Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. J. Creative Behav. 31(1):18–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Barsade SG, Mueller JS, Staw BM (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):367–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Bacevice P, Burow L, Tribner M (2016) 7 factors of great office design. Harvard Business Review. Accessed March 31, 2020, https://hbr.org/2016/05/7-factors-of-great-office-design.Google Scholar
• Baird B, Smallwood J, Mrazek MD, Kam JW, Franklin MS, Schooler JW (2012) Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psych. Sci. 23(10):1117–1122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2003) Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):238–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billinger S, Stieglitz N, Schumacher TR (2014) Search on rugged landscapes: An experimental study. Organ. Sci. 25(1):93–108.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Brucks MS, Levav J (2022) Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation. Nature 605(7908):108–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardoso C, Badke‐Schaub P (2011) The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. J. Creative Behav. 45(2):130–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrick AM, Sosa ME (2018) Eight Inc. and Apple retail stores. INSEAD Case Study Reference No. 617-0065-1, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Catalini C (2018) Microgeography and the direction of inventive activity. Management Sci. 64(9):4348–4364.Link, Google Scholar
• Ceylan C, Dul J, Aytac S (2008) Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors Ergonomics Manufacturing Service Indust. 18(6):589–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TH, Mihm J, Sosa M (2021) Revisiting the role of collaboration in creating breakthrough inventions. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 23(5):1005–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Chrysikou EG, Weisberg RW (2005) Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 31(5):1134–1148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (2019) How to foster creativity in the workplace. WeWork. Accessed March 31, 2020, https://www.wework.com/ideas/growth-innovation/foster-creative-culture.Google Scholar
• Crilly N, Cardoso C (2017) Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design? Design Stud. 50:1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosina E (2024) Co-constructing community and entrepreneurial identity: How founders ascribe self-referential meanings to entrepreneurship. Admin. Sci. Quart. 69(2):370–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1083–1101.Link, Google Scholar
• de Bono E (2010) Lateral Thinking (Penguin Books, London).Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Baas M, Nijstad BA (2008) Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(5):739–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis A, Meurs T (2006) Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness Cognition 15(1):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doorley S, Witthoft S (2012) Make Space: How to Set the Stage for Creative Collaboration (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S (2018) The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncker K (1945) On problem solving. Psych. Monographs 58(5):1–113.Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaul A (2018) Motivation and ability? A behavioral perspective on the pursuit of radical invention in multi-technology incumbents. Acad. Management J. 61(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Pratt MG (2007) The physical environment in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):181–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Grushka-Cockayne Y, Erat S, Wooten J (2018) New product development and project management decisions. Donohue K, Katok E, Leider S, eds. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guilford JP (1967) The Nature of Human Intelligence (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt LP, Dossinger K, Harrison SH, Huang L (2019) Curiosity made the cat more creative: Specific curiosity as a driver of creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 150:1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris R (2019) Defining and measuring the productive office. J. Corporate Real Estate 21(1):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horvát EÁ, Uzzi B (2022) Virtual collaboration hinders a key component of creativity. Nature 605(7908):38–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Design Stud. 12(1):3–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagan E, Leider S, Lovejoy WS (2018) Ideation–execution transition in product development: An experimental analysis. Management Sci. 64(5):2238–2262.Link, Google Scholar
• Kallio TJ, Kallio K-M, Blomberg AJ (2015) Physical space, culture and organisational creativity—A longitudinal study. Facilities 33(5/6):389–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S, Sommer SC (2009) The effects of problem structure and team diversity on brainstorming effectiveness. Management Sci. 55(12):1899–1913.Link, Google Scholar
• Keum DD, See KE (2017) The influence of hierarchy on idea generation and selection in the innovation process. Organ. Sci. 28(4):653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Kobe T, Lehman R (2021) Return on Experience (Oro Editions, Novato, CA).Google Scholar
• Kohn NW, Smith SM (2011) Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 25(3):359–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Ulrich KT (2011) Opportunity spaces in innovation: Empirical analysis of large samples of ideas. Management Sci. 57(1):107–128.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee YS (2016) Creative workplace characteristics and innovative start-up companies. Facilities 34(7/8):412–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2019) Learning-by-moving: Can reconfiguring spatial proximity between organizational members promote individual-level exploration? Organ. Sci. 30(3):467–488.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Meyer-Doyle P (2017) How performance incentives shape individual exploration and exploitation: Evidence from microdata. Organ. Sci. 28(1):19–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Mihm J, Sosa ME (2018) Where do stars come from? The role of star vs. non-star collaborators in creative settings. Organ. Sci. 29(6):989–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu JG, Akinola M, Mason MF (2017) “Switching on” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 139:63–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maier L, Baccarella CV, Wagner TF, Meinel M, Eismann T, Voigt KI (2022) Saw the office, want the job: The effect of creative workspace design on organizational attractiveness. J. Environ. Psych. 80:1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCoy JM, Evans GW (2002) The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Res. J. 14(3–4):409–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meinel M, Maier L, Wagner T, Voigt KI (2017) Designing creativity-enhancing workspaces: A critical look at empirical evidence. J. Tech. Innovation Management 1(1):1–12.Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Gino F, Argote L (2011) Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):229–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray N, Sujan H, Hirt ER, Sujan M (1990) The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(3):411–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, De Dreu CK, Rietzschel EF, Baas M (2010) The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 21(1):34–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palvalin M, van der Voordt T, Jylhä T (2017) The impact of workplaces and self-management practices on the productivity of knowledge workers. J. Facilities Management 15(4):423–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piotrowski CM (2016) Designing Commercial Interiors (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Roche MP, Oettl A, Catalini C (2024) Proximate (co-)working: Knowledge spillovers and social interactions. Management Sci. 70(12):8245–8264.Link, Google Scholar
• Runco M (2011) Divergent thinking. Runco M, Pritzker S, eds. Encyclopedia of Creativity (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 400–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savino T, Petruzzelli AM, Albino V (2017) Search and recombination process to innovate: A review of the empirical evidence and a research agenda. Internat. J. Management Rev. 19(1):54–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silvia PJ, Winterstein BP, Willse JT, Barona CM, Cram JT, Hess KI, Martinez JL, Richard CA (2008) Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psych. Aesthetics Creativity Arts 2(2):68–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Ward TB, Schumacher JS (1993) Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory Cognition 21(6):837–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommer SC, Bendoly E, Kavadias S (2020) How do you search for the best alternative? Experimental evidence on search strategies to solve complex problems. Management Sci. 66(3):1395–1420.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME (2011) Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ. Sci. 22(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Stallworth OE, Kleiner BH (1996) Recent developments in office design. Facilities 14(1/2):34–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stegmeier D (2008) Innovations in Office Design: The Critical Influence Approach to Effective Work Environments (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Thompson B, Jonas D (2008) Workplace Design and Productivity: Are They Inextricably Linked? (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London).Google Scholar
• Thoring K, Gonçalves M, Mueller RM, Desmet P, Badke-Schaub P (2021) The architecture of creativity: Toward a causal theory of creative workspace design. Internat. J. Design 15(2):17–36.Google Scholar
• Turner G, Myerson J (1998) New Workspace, New Culture: Office Design as a Catalyst for Change (Gower Publishing, Brookfield, VA).Google Scholar
• Waber B, Magnolfi J, Lindsay G (2014) Workspaces that move people. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(10):68–77.Google Scholar