Do Consumers Respond to Social Movements? Evidence from Gender-Stereotypical Purchases After #MeToo

References

• Agarwal S, Sen A (2022) Antiracist curriculum and digital platforms: Evidence from Black Lives Matter. Management Sci. 68(4):2932–2948.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Marwell N, McGranahan L (2017) Consumption responses to temporary tax incentives: Evidence from state sales tax holidays. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 9(4):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander GM (2003) An evolutionary perspective of sex-typed toy preferences: Pink, blue, and the brain. Arch. Sexual Behav. 32(1):7–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005) Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aspers P, Godart F (2013) Sociology of fashion: Order and change. Annual Rev. Sociol. 39(1):171–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkin D (2016) The caloric costs of culture: Evidence from Indian migrants. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(4):1144–1181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkin D, Colson-Sihra E, Shayo M (2021) How do we choose our identity? A revealed preference approach using food consumption. J. Political Econom. 129(4):1193–1251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batut C, Coly C, Schneider-Strawczynski S (2021) It’s a man’s world: Culture of abuse, #MeToo and worker flows. Working Paper No. 149, The Dondena Centre, Università Bocconi, Milan.Google Scholar
• Belk RW (2003) Shoes and self. Adv. Consumer Res. 30(1):27–33.Google Scholar
• Bellet C (2024) The McMansion effect: Positional externalities in U.S. suburbs. J. Public Econom. 238:105174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjamin DJ, Choi JJ, Strickland AJ (2010) Social identity and preferences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1913–1928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C (2007) Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. J. Consumer Res. 34(2):121–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M (2020) Gender in the twenty-first century. AEA Papers Proc. 110:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Kamenica E (2023) Coming apart? Cultural distances in the United States over time. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 15(4):100–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee A, Berger J, Menon G (2014) When identity marketing backfires: Consumer agency in identity expression. J. Consumer Res. 41(2):294–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Dias MC (2009) Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics. J. Human Resources 44(3):565–640.Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2016) Stereotypes. Quart. J. Econom. 131(4):1753–1794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordalo P, Coffman K, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2019) Beliefs about gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(3):739–773.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Ferman B, Fiorin S, Kanz M, Rao G (2018) Status goods: Experimental evidence from platinum credit cards. Quart. J. Econom. 133(3):1561–1595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castells M (2011) The Power of Identity, Information Age Series, vol. 14 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Coffman KB (2014) Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1625–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coffman K, Collis M, Kulkarni L (2019) Stereotypes and Belief Updating (Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Coffman KB, Exley CL, Niederle M (2021) The role of beliefs in driving gender discrimination. Management Sci. 67(6):3551–3569.Link, Google Scholar
• Conlon CT, Mortimer JH (2013) Demand estimation under incomplete product availability. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 5(4):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl GB, Kotsadam A, Rooth D-O (2021) Does integration change gender attitudes? The effect of randomly assigning women to traditionally male teams. Quart. J. Econom. 136(2):987–1030.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Del Carpio L, Guadalupe M (2021) More women in tech? Evidence from a field experiment addressing social identity. Management Sci. 68(5):3196–3218.Link, Google Scholar
• Dilley R, Hockey J, Robinson V, Sherlock A (2015) Occasions and non-occasions: Identity, femininity and high-heeled shoes. Eur. J. Women’s Stud. 22(2):143–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Nater C, Miller DI, Kaufmann M, Sczesny S (2020) Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of US public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. Amer. Psych. 75(3):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einav L, Knoepfle D, Levin J, Sundaresan N (2014) Sales taxes and Internet commerce. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellemers N, Kortekaas P, Ouwerkerk JW (1999) Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 29(2–3):371–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethier KA, Deaux K (1994) Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(2):243–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felmlee D, Inara Rodis P, Zhang A (2020) Sexist slurs: Reinforcing feminine stereotypes online. Sex Roles 83(1):16–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Kübler D, Stüber R (2023) Betting on diversity—Occupational segregation and gender stereotypes. Management Sci. 70(8):5502–5516.Link, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Glick P (1995) Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organizational change. J. Soc. Issues 51(1):97–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman V, Trebay G (2021) The end of gender: Has fashion bid the binary goodbye? New York Times (October 11), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/11/fashion/the-end-of-gender.html.Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Goldfarb A, Lederman M (2021) Exit, tweets, and loyalty. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. 13(2):68–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• García-Jimeno C, Iglesias A, Yildirim P (2022) Information networks and collective action: Evidence from the women’s temperance crusade. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(1):41–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garg N, Schiebinger L, Jurafsky D, Zou J (2018) Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115(16):E3635–E3644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godart FC (2018) Why is style not in fashion? Using the concept of “style” to understand the creative industries. Jones C, Maoret M, eds. Frontiers of Creative Industries: Exploring Structural and Categorical Dynamics, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 55 (Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, UK), 103–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godart F, Hsu G, Negro G (2023) Gatekeeping and the use of contested practices in creative industries: The case of fur in fashion. Organ. Sci. 34(2):637–656.Link, Google Scholar
• Grohmann B (2009) Gender dimensions of brand personality. J. Marketing Res. 46(1):105–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halberstam Y, Knight B (2016) Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter. J. Public Econom. 143:73–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heffetz O (2011) A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. Rev. Econom. Statist. 93(4):1101–1117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L, Zhang L (2021) Measuring the impact of #MeToo on gender equity in Hollywood. Harvard Bus. Rev. (May 19), https://hbr.org/2021/05/measuring-the-impact-of-metoo-on-gender-equity-in-hollywood.Google Scholar
• Hootsuite (2019) The global state of digital 2019: Global yearbook. DATAREPORTAL (January 31), https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-global-digital-overview.Google Scholar
• Jasper JM (2011) Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Rev. Sociol. 37:285–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karniol R (2011) The color of children’s gender stereotypes. Sex Roles 65(1):119–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim T, Barasz K, Norton MI, John LK (2023) Calculators for women: When identity-based appeals alienate consumers. J. Assoc. Consumer Res. 8(1):72–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kranton RE (2016) Identity economics 2016: Where do social distinctions and norms come from? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):405–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labrecque LI, Milne GR (2012) Exciting red and competent blue: The importance of color in marketing. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(5):711–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K, Kim H, Vohs KD (2011) Stereotype threat in the marketplace: Consumer anxiety and purchase intentions. J. Consumer Res. 38(2):343–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy R, Mattsson M (2023) The effects of social movements: Evidence from #MeToo. Preprint, submitted April 27, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3496903.Google Scholar
• Liaukonytė J, Tuchman A, Zhu X (2023) Frontiers: Spilling the beans on political consumerism: Do social media boycotts and buycotts translate to real sales impact? Marketing Sci. 42(1):11–25.Link, Google Scholar
• Lieven T, Grohmann B, Herrmann A, Landwehr JR, Van Tilburg M (2015) The effect of brand design on brand gender perceptions and brand preference. Eur. J. Marketing 49(1–2):146–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lins KV, Roth L, Servaes H, Tamayo A (2020) Gender, culture, and firm value: Evidence from the Harvey Weinstein scandal and the #MeToo movement. University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper (2019-509), University of Alberta, Edmonton.Google Scholar
• Luo H, Zhang L (2021a) Gender inequality and the direction of ideas: Evidence from the Weinstein scandal and #MeToo. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 21-107, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Luo H, Zhang L (2021b) Scandal, social movement, and change: Evidence from #MeToo in Hollywood. Management Sci. 68(2):1278–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Maheshwari S, Friedman V (2021) Victoria’s Secret swaps angels for ‘what women want.’ Will they buy it? New York Times (June 16), https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/16/business/victorias-secret-collective-megan-rapinoe.html.Google Scholar
• Matta S, Folkes VS (2005) Inferences about the brand from counterstereotypical service providers. J. Consumer Res. 32(2):196–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris PH, White J, Morrison ER, Fisher K (2013) High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgements of female attractiveness. Evolution Human Behav. 34(3):176–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moshary S, Tuchman A, Vajravelu N (2023) Gender-based pricing in consumer packaged goods: A pink tax? Marketing Sci., ePub ahead of print July 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.1452.Link, Google Scholar
• Moss G, Gunn R, Heller J (2006) Some men like it black, some women like it pink: Consumer implications of differences in male and female website design. J. Consumer Behav. 5(4):328–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olden A, Moen J (2022) The triple difference estimator. Econometrics J. 25(3):531–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldstone-Moore C (2015) Of Beards and Men: The Revealing History of Facial Hair (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polletta F, Jasper JM (2001) Collective identity and social movements. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):283–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rathje S, Mirea D-M, Sucholutsky I, Marjieh R, Robertson C, Van Bavel JJ (2024) GPT is an effective tool for multilingual psychological text analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121(34):e2308950121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis B, Pereira M, Azevedo S, Jeronimo N, Miguel R (2018) Genderless clothing issues in fashion. Montagna G, Carvalho C, eds. Textiles, Identity and Innovation: Design the Future (CRC Press, London), 255–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoenmueller V, Netzer O, Stahl F (2023) Frontiers: Polarized America: From political polarization to preference polarization. Marketing Sci. 42(1):48–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwemmer C, Knight C, Bello-Pardo ED, Oklobdzija S, Schoonvelde M, Lockhart JW (2020) Diagnosing gender bias in image recognition systems. Socius 6:2378023120967171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Semmelhack E (2008) Heights of Fashion: A History of the Elevated Shoe (Bata Shoe Museum, Toronto).Google Scholar
• Simonson A, Schmitt BH (1997) Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity, and Image (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Spencer SJ, Logel C, Davies PG (2016) Stereotype threat. Annual Rev. Psych. 67(1):415–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stolle D, Hooghe M, Micheletti M (2005) Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. Internat. Political Sci. Rev. 26(3):245–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stryker S, Owens TJ, White RW, eds. (2000) Self, Identity, and Social Movements (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• Sun Q, Wu F, Li S, Grewal R (2021) Consumer boycotts, country of origin, and product competition: Evidence from China’s automobile market. Management Sci. 67(9):5857–5877.Link, Google Scholar
• Tartaglia S, Rollero C (2015) Gender stereotyping in newspaper advertisements: A cross-cultural study. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. 46(8):1103–1109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thau B (2018) Is the #MeToo era hurting Victoria’s Secret? Two branding experts hold differing opinions. Forbes (April 26), https://www.forbes.com/sites/barbarathau/2018/04/26/is-the-metoo-era-hurting-victorias-secret-two-branding-experts-strongly-disagree/.Google Scholar
• Tilly C, Wood LJ (2020) Social Movements, 1768–2008 (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Google Scholar
• Van Tilburg M, Lieven T, Herrmann A, Townsend C (2015) Beyond “pink it and shrink it” perceived product gender, aesthetics, and product evaluation. Psych. Marketing 32(4):422–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren M, Spears R, Fischer AH, Leach CW (2004) Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(5):649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White K, Argo JJ (2009) Social identity threat and consumer preferences. J. Consumer Psych. 19(3):313–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright L (2017) Objectifying gender: The stiletto heel. Barnard M, ed. Fashion Theory (Routledge, London), 197–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2012) Cloak or flaunt? The fashion dilemma. Marketing Sci. 31(1):74–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2017) Identifying the presence and cause of fashion cycles in data. J. Marketing Res. 54(1):5–26.Crossref, Google Scholar