Filling the Gap: The Consequences of Collaborator Loss in Corporate R&D

References

• Aggarwal VA, Hsu DH, Wu A (2020) Organizing knowledge production teams within firms for innovation. Strategy Sci. 5(1):1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Cockburn I, McHale J (2006) Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. J. Econom. Geography 6(5):571–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akcigit U, Caicedo S, Miguelez E, Stantcheva S, Sterzi V (2018) Dancing with the stars: Innovation through interactions. NBER Working Paper No. 24466, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. 25(1):107–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J, Gittelman M (2006) Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):774–779.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson T (2024) Left behind? Understanding the career consequences of collaborator exits. Acad. Management J. 67(2):526–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Rios LA, Silverman BS (2020) Organizational change and the dynamics of innovation: Formal R&D structure and intrafirm inventor networks. Strategic Management J. 41(11):2015–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T, Ejermo O, Toivanen O (2023) Death and turmoil in R&D teams. CEPR Discussion Paper 18578:1–44.Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (2004) Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Vernon Henderson J, Thisse J-F, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2713–2739.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin JS, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Lück S (2023) Isolating personal knowledge spillovers: Co-inventor deaths and spatial citation differentials. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 5(1):21–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bender S, Bloom N, Card D, Van Reenen J, Wolter S (2018) Management practices, workforce selection, and productivity. J. Labor Econom. 36(S1):S371–S409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S, Diamond R, Jiranaphawiboon A, McQuade T, Pousada B (2022) The contribution of high-skilled immigrants to innovation in the United States. NBER Working Paper No. 30797, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bhaskarabhatla A, Cabral L, Hegde D, Peeters T (2021) Are inventors or firms the engines of innovation? Management Sci. 67(6):3899–3920.Link, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Lissoni F (2004) Knowledge networks from patent data. Moed H, Glänzel W, Schmoch U, eds. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 613–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Coff R, Kryscynski D (2012) Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):376–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, Heining J, Kline P (2013) Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of West German wage inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 128(3):967–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang MH (2023) Cascading innovation: R&D team design and performance implications of mobility. Strategic Management J. 44(5):1218–1253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterji A, Patro A (2014) Dynamic capabilities and managing human capital. Acad. Management Perspectives 28(4):395–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Roth J (2024) Logs with zeros? Some problems and solutions. Quart. J. Econom. 139(2):891–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Doran K, Marinoni A, Yoon C (2024) Loss of peers and individual worker performance: Evidence from h-1b visa denials. Organ. Sci. 35(6):1957–2332.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Cornelissen T, Dustmann C, Schönberg U (2017) Peer effects in the workplace. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(2):425–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH, Prusak L (1998) Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Dencker JC (2009) Relative bargaining power, corporate restructuring, and managerial incentives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):453–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dorner M, Harhoff D, Gaessler F, Hoisl K, Poege F (2018) Linked Inventor Biography Data 1980-2014 (Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany).Google Scholar
• Droege SB, Hoobler JM (2003) Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective. J. Managerial Issues 15(1):50–64.Google Scholar
• Dustmann C, Ludsteck J, Schoenberg U (2009) Revisiting the German wage structure. Quart. J. Econom. 124(2):843–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dustmann C, Schoenberg U, Stuhler J (2017) Labor supply shocks, native wages, and the adjustment of local employment. Quart. J. Econom. 132(1):435–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuest C, Peichl A, Siegloch S (2018) Do higher corporate taxes reduce wages? Micro evidence from Germany. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(2):393–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganzer A, Schmucker A, Stegmaier J, Wolter S (2023) Establishment history panel 1975-2022. FDZ-Datenreport. Documentation on Labour Market Data (Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany).Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimpe C, Kaiser U (2010) Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. J. Management Stud. 47(8):1483–1509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guler I, Nerkar A (2012) The impact of global and local cohesion on innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 33(5):535–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatch NW, Dyer JH (2004) Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. 25(12):1155–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaton L, Taylor JR (2002) Knowledge management and professional work: A communication perspective on the knowledge-based organization. Management Comm. Quart. 16(2):210–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaeger S, Heining J (2022) How substitutable are workers? Evidence from worker deaths. NBER Working Paper No. w30629, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market values. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaravel X, Petkova N, Bell A (2018) Team-specific capital and innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 108(4–5):1034–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaiser U, Kongsted HC, Rønde T (2015) Does the mobility of R&D labor increase innovation? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 110:91–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Adner R (2012) What firms make vs. what they know: How firms’ production and knowledge boundaries affect competitive advantage in the face of technological change. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1227–1248.Link, Google Scholar
• Khanna R (2021) Aftermath of a tragedy: A star’s death and coauthors’ subsequent productivity. Res. Policy 50(2):104159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M (2004) Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econom. J. 114(495):441–465.Google Scholar
• Lecuona JR, Reitzig M (2014) Knowledge worth having in ‘excess’: The value of tacit and firm-specific human resource slack. Strategic Management J. 35(7):954–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Wulf J (2007) Innovation and incentives: Evidence from corporate R&D. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(4):634–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu L, Melero E, Palomeras N (2023) The effect of inventor collaboration on mobility: The role of technological complexity and obsolescence rate. https://www.liliu.net/files/LILIU_JMP_The%20Effect%20of%20Collaboration%20on%20Inventor%27s%20Mobility%20Quasi-experimental%20Evidence%20From%20Inventors%E2%80%99%20Death.pdf.Google Scholar
• López-Sáez P, Navas-López JE, Martín-de Castro G, Cruz-González J (2010) External knowledge acquisition processes in knowledge-intensive clusters. J. Knowledge Management 14(5):690–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1890) Principles of Economics (MacMillan and Co, London and New York).Google Scholar
• Mårtensson M (2000) A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool. J. Knowledge Management 4(3):204–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK, Somaya D (2016) Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Management 42(1):85–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mercan Y, Schoefer B (2020) Jobs and matches: Quits, replacement hiring, and vacancy chains. Amer. Econom. Rev. Insights 2(1):101–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohnen M (2022) Stars and brokers: Knowledge spillovers among medical scientists. Management Sci. 68(4):2513–2532.Link, Google Scholar
• Nakajima R, Tamura R, Hanaki N (2010) The effect of collaboration network on inventors’ job match, productivity and tenure. Labour Econom. 17(4):723–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng TW, Sorensen KL, Eby LT, Feldman DC (2007) Determinants of job mobility: A theoretical integration and extension. J. Occupation Organ. Psych. 80(3):363–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Renzl B (2008) Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega 36(2):206–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth J, Sant’Anna PH, Bilinski A, Poe J (2023) What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. J. Econometrics 235(2):2218–2244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sevcenko V, Wu L, Kacperczyk A, Ethiraj S (2022) Surplus division between labor and capital: A review and research agenda. Ann. Management Rev. 16(1):334–390.Google Scholar
• Sharoni B (2023) The effect of inventor mobility on network productivity. https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.harvard.edu/dist/c/534/files/2023/11/JMP_BritSharoni.pdf.Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Simons KL (2010) Assessing the effects of mergers and acquisitions on firm performance, plant productivity, and workers: New evidence from matched employer-employee data. Strategic Management J. 31(8):903–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldinger F (2012) Peer effects in science: Evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(2):838–861.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wang D, Evans JA (2019) Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566(7744):378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong J (1998) Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Econom. Inquiry 36(1):65–86.Crossref, Google Scholar